Posted on 11/10/2012 2:16:57 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Let’s just go ahead and get this out of the way, eh? Aren’t feminists who embrace the “slut” label (e.g., “Slutwalk“) all about empowerment and liberation? And if you are an empowered liberated woman, what difference does it make if you’re married or your partner is married? All those silly vows — “Forsaking all others” and so forth — are just oppressive tools by which the patriarchy subjugates women, and anyone who buys into moral ideals of marital permanence and lifelong fidelity has succumbed to what the Marxists would call “false consciousness.”
Stipulate that adultery has occurred and continues to occur even in the most traditionalist societies, as for example the infamous Beecher-Tilton scandal. We can’t blame feminism for everything.
Still, doesn’t it just make sense that the cheating husband will have more opportunities to cheat in a culture where rhetoric about the sexual empowerment of women is so widely accepted that anyone who dares question it is condemned as a misogynist or a puritanial religious fanatic? In the case of Gen. David Petraeus and his affair with biographer Paula Broadwell, is there no one who can defend the marital rights of Holly Petraeus, the general’s wife of 37 years, without being accused of hypocrisy, prudery or sexism? And what about the husband — father of her two sons — whom the slut Paula Broadwell betrayed?
Taylor Berman at Gawker examines the evidence that Scott Broadwell suspected his wife was cheating with Petraeus and wrote a letter to New York Times advice columnist Chuck Klosterman and received a published answer informed by political correctness and moral relativism:
Don’t expose the affair in any high-profile way. It would be different if this man’s project was promoting some (contextually hypocritical) family-values platform, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. . . . This is between you and your spouse.
Right: Adultery is only a scandal if it involves hypocrisy, and only Republican “family-values” spokesmen are capable of hypocrisy, so the adultery of an important Obama administration official should be viewed as strictly a private matter. If it weren’t for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all.
According to her Wikipedia page, Broadwell remained an Army reserve officer while she was knocking boots with the CIA director and was only recently elevated to the rank of lieutenant colonel, a promotion she never would have gotten had her illicit affair been exposed earlier. And it appears the slut was very cunning in her seduction:
Paula Broadwell, 39, has said she often conducted interviews with Petraeus while jogging. The pair met in 2006, when she was attending the Kennedy Center for Public Leadership at Harvard.
Ah, yes — the elite institution, and the ambitious West Point graduate using her sexuality to gain advantageous access to the Alpha Male, who had conveniently tucked his wife into a political sinecure with the Obama administration’s pet bureaucracy:
His wife, Holly, the daughter of a West Point superintendent, heads the office for service-member affairs in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency created by the 2010 financial-regulation law.
Give the Missus a do-gooder job to keep her busy while you’re keeping busy with other things, eh, General?
Of course, the feminists will cry foul that I am interpreting this tawdry human drama ideologically, even while they themselves view it through the lens of their own narrow ideology. My point is not that feminism causes adultery, but rather that the feminist rhetoric of “empowerment” provides a convenient rationalization for such behavior, and that feminism privileges the interests of a relatively small cadre of women (elite careerist strivers like Paula Broadwell) over the interests of others.
The inherent selfishness of feminism — its meaning as the expression of the power-oriented ambitions of a self-interested elite — is what needs to be examined. As is so often true in radical politics, the demand for “equality” is a precursor to the demand for hegemonic superiority.
maybe its all a put up deal to frame someone to control them.
Totally hot and provocative.
Mr Broadwell could break up his marriage without exposing Petraeus.
The angst in his letter to The Ethicist makes no sense.
No, but if the article also referred to the "lecher" Petreaus, it would be somewhat fair.
Do you not think she has loose sexual morals? Evidence says otherwise.
“Ms. Broadwell made explicit email threats to another woman..”
Hmmmm, must have discovered another woman that the General was “mentoring”. Petraeus is a busy man.
Slut with a slot.
No she sounds more like a woman in need.
” - - - Perhaps codename Bang Hussy - - - “
Probably not, as Free Sex Advocate Sandra Fluke already is enjoyed that description, as we write, and write, and write - - - .
Dan Ackroyd: “Paula, you highly educated and well-connected slut.....”
I have to wonder if threats to reveal this affair had anything to do with Patreaus backing gays in the military.
Never understood why Petreaus went with the Obama administration. Just seemed beneath him to be so closely associated with Obama and especially Hillary after making the Be-Tray-us comment.
You are thinking of General Demsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He made the phone call to Pasrtor Jones, “on his own”.
Maybe he should have doing military planning for rescues of ambassadors—you know, like what we pay him for.
Another perfumed prince.
Petraeus and his wife are apparently community organizers in training.
How would you describe her and her behavior?
And what are we to call him and his behavior? Wasn’t he just as married as she was? What is the male equivalent of the word “Slut”? Why do we call adulterous women “sluts” and male adulterers something like “players”? What is the male equivalent of the word “Slut”? There should really be one so I’ll invent one – “Mlut” as in “The Mlut David Petraeus”.
So what would you call a woman who is married (and with children) who engages in an adulterous affair with a married man(who also has children)?
Is your quibble merely because you don’t know if she has had more than one affair? Am I allowed to ask the non-PC question——did she sleep her way to the top???
Rumors have it that it was an Lizzy Warren aide that was the target of the email attacks. Rumors....
Occam's razor says that one who has embraced moral relativism would be inclined to have an adulterous affair and back gays in the military without the need for any coercion in either endeavour.
Yes, because she is one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.