Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Anchors away!
1 posted on 10/29/2012 9:16:45 AM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: raptor22

We have two coasts to defend. A strong navy is important.


2 posted on 10/29/2012 9:25:20 AM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

“Oh, hear us when we cry to Thee
For those in peril on the sea.”


3 posted on 10/29/2012 9:29:33 AM PDT by ArmyTeach (Our liberties, we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa BB 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

The United States has enjoyed control of the seas since World War II. Even the Royal Navy at the height of her power could not claim the same. While control does not require constant presence, we must be able to send ships in harm’s way on short notice anywhere in the world. Our fleet is built around the carrier task force and our current establishment limits our ability to put carriers where we need them at any given time. When our ships disappear over the horizon, the bad guys can come out to play.


4 posted on 10/29/2012 9:50:17 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

obama’s comments about the Navy were the rudest and most ignorant of the campaign season. It shows he knows absolutely nothing about the military.

The Navy role in modern warfare has expanded dramatically since 1917. Supporting the Nuclear Triad, Tactical Strike Combat, and air superiority far inland (Afghanistan). All while it had to continue its tradition missions. All these missions require ships, and a lot of them.


5 posted on 10/29/2012 10:15:41 AM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Where was the carrier in the Med when Benghazi went down?


6 posted on 10/29/2012 10:39:39 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Why not eliminate the middle man and have whoever feeds Obama his lines debate Romney directly?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Obama’s goal is to disarm us and leave us to the mercies of the terrorists.


7 posted on 10/29/2012 11:03:05 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Stop making sense. According to Obama we have things called "carriers" and "submarines" which implies that technology can stop anything. Yes, we have the most advanced technology for now, depending on if he is willing to sell such to others as Clinton did to China. I suspect he would love to give Aegis tech to someone, just to equalize the world.

Point is, no matter how advanced our current weaponry is, we need to have the ships to provide it at any hot spot at any time. One of the reasons we are the so-called lone superpower is because we have kept the seas free for trade and against aggression. I'd like to keep it that way. MORE SHIPS!

8 posted on 10/29/2012 1:26:07 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson