Posted on 10/27/2012 5:04:07 PM PDT by Snuph
A Mideast “Fast and Furious” emerging within weeks of the election would be devastating
On October 4 in Canada Free Press, I wrote a column entitled Was Ambassador Stevens’ Death a Hit?, so suspicious did I find the circumstances surrounding the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi, Libya at that time. On October 25, I followed up with Obama’s Feet of Clay, in which I discussed the likelihood that President Barack Obama failed to react to the attack despite real-time knowledge of developments in Benghazi because he wished to obscure or bury evidence of the administration’s gun running activities to Libyan and Syrian rebels.
The reason for Obama’s desire to do so, in this scenario, would be twofold. One, because weapons were not only being provided to Libyan and Syrian rebels, but were in fact being provided to jihadists across the Middle East with whom Obama sympathizes, but who are enemies of the US. Two, because Ambassador Christopher Stevens himself may have become a liability for reasons still uncertain (although my first column outlines one possibility). The fact that Stevens’ mission, and that of other US operatives in Libya was a clandestine one has been established; this is certainly a likely reason for Obama to want a lid kept on it. If revealed, obviously this would substantially threaten his re-election chances.
As I indicated early on, not only did I see Obama’s pre-September 11 actions as being executed in order to cultivate plausible deniability on his part, but I suspected even then that he might have employed rebels or jihadis to eliminate Stevens. It does bear mentioning that Obama’s cavalier dismissal of intelligence briefings leading up to Sept. 11, 2012 was widely reported prior to that date.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
One question: Where is the body of Ambassador Stevens tonight? They said he died in hospital....was that before or after he was sodomized and dragged through the streets?
As they used to say in Kentucky, looks like Hillary was rode hard and put away wet.
“At least we now know what Obama does when he gets that 3AM phone call referenced during the 2008 campaign. He waits until everyone’s dead, then goes back to bed. “
Even worse, he doesn’t just ‘wait’, he REFUSES help, then waits.
Thanks for posting. I’m going to go back and read some of his previous stuff because I don’t know much about the Lybia ‘gun running’ operation (or whatever it was called). I’ve always found that site to be in the know.
Well Obama and his media pals have succeeded in confusing every thing to the extent that no one seems to know what actually happened.
I do know a little bit.
First of all, it obviously was not because of a video. Second 4 Americans are dead, killed by Muslims and 3, Obama did nothing to help the Americans.
It does appear that at one time, Obama did help these particular Muslims take control of Libya.
This article gets to a question that few have asked: what were the motives of the attackers. Was this just random act of anti-U.S. terrorism or was it more tactical. Was Stevens specifically targetted? Was the the Benghazi consulate targetted because of its involvement in arms sales throughout the mideast? Who were the attackers, what were they trying to achieve, and who gave the orders to attack?
This article gets to a question that few have asked: what were the motives of the attackers. Was this just random act of anti-U.S. terrorism or was it more tactical. Was Stevens specifically targetted? Was the the Benghazi consulate targetted because of its involvement in arms sales throughout the mideast? Who were the attackers, what were they trying to achieve, and who gave the orders to attack?
booze will do that to you
Someone has been reading our posts.
Here's the logic I see:
Obama and Hillary deliberately enabled the attack. They sent Stevens there, they restricted and denied security, and whent he attack came, they denied help - specifically ordering onsite military assets not to engage up to three separate times.
So, who does this help?
Does it help Obama? Are you kidding? The country is enraged, and it's wiping out his last chance for re-election and actually bringing up the idea of impeachment, if not also charges. So why would Team Obama deliberately do this (because they DID deliberately do this)? Answer: they didn't. Stevens was supposed to be KIDNAPPED. That's why rescue efforts were blocked. But instead, he died - and know all hell has broken loose against Obama.
But who was the other main player? Hillary. Who comes out on top politically, if Obama goes down for this? Hillary. Who has the power to have engineered no escape - or certain doom - for Stevens? Hillary. Who would be the next Rat presidential candidate if Obama goes down for this? Hillary.
These are just facts - not even argument.
The only question is, are you looking at coincidence?
Or calculation?
Hillary looks beaten. Remember how bright and cheerful she used to be? Since the last days of the 2008 primary she has just looked beaten.
quote:
I make this inference from a wealth of knowledge of Barack Obama as a person and a politician, from years of studying him, his methods and motives, and from individuals who know the man. I have stated quite plainly that I believe he is a sociopath and malignant narcissist, an opinion that has been publicly shared by credentialed professionals in the field of psychology. It is more than likely that Obama has engaged in such action before, and on more than one occasion.
0m0slem owns the title and keys to her honeypot.
Sounds like the dark ops you see in movies produced by liberals.
OK. I can kind of understand Syria, but why were Obama and Hillary messing around with Libya and Egypt? It’s not like either one of them grew up in the freedom fighter world with a knife between their teeth. These two are Democrat grifters out to get themselves as much as possible and fund Democrat campaigns as a bonus. What’s in this for them?
What was really going on at the annex ... The John Batchelor Show ^ | October 27,2012 | John Batchelor
It's hard to say at this point if Obama's behavior (going to bed rather than trying to save lives) was simply indifference (counting on the media to protect him from any negative fallout) or something more sinister (as has been argued by some).
9 more days before the election and the media can spend most of that obsessing about the hurricane...as if they would bother to pay attention to Benghazi anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.