Posted on 10/18/2012 7:54:19 AM PDT by opentalk
Watch again the exchange between Mitt Romney and Obama during the last debate when the issue of Benghazigate came up.
Listen to how Obama tells Candy Crowley to ‘get the transcript’ after Romney asks Obama if he called the Benghazi terrorist attack an ‘act of terror’ in the rose garden before he popped off the Las Vegas for a fund raiser.
Like a good lapdog, Crowley retrieves the transcript to ‘correct’ Romney and protect Obama.
She later appeared on the CNN post debate recap to admit Mitt Romney was in fact right that Obama never referred to the actual terrorist attack in Bengahzi as an ‘act of terror.’
But this begs the question. Why did Candy Crowley have the transcript with her in the first place, and how did Obama know she had it on her? Something very fishy went on here.
BTW, speaking of ‘fact-checking’ why didn’t Crowley ‘fact-check’ Obama when he falsely claimed that Planned Parenthood provides mammograms to women? No transcript provided there Candy?
Just more evidence that CNN is a wing of the DNC.
Obama chose the questions.
the applause was planned.
The Benghazi gotcha was a setup
The interruptions occurred after Obama said “Candy”
The transcript
The camera angles
EVERYTHING STAGED
This was collusion.
Someone needs to do some checking, WHY DID HE SAY GET THE TRANSCRIPT, and how did she just happened to have the transcript if this wasn’t a SET UP to smash Mitt.
The convincing manner in which Obama lies is chilling.
I see an AD there somewhere! C’mon RNC!!
I watched the debate and caught that too.
I thought it was oh so convenient that she just happened to have that very transcript.
That’s what I was thinking. Isn’t there some kind of a maybe FCC law against the narrator openly helping the candidate?
Wow...And he had the oo to exclaim “say it louder”...when silence would have been the less obvious give away to the collusion.
I don’t like being lied to. What POTUS and Crowley said is a lie.
I wish Romney had said something like this:
You said ‘No acts of terror...’ you did not say: ‘This act of terror(ism)...’
With the 3 AM phone call you went back to sleep. Did you call the State Department, Secretary of State or go watch the live feed...? Did you open lines of communication with those responsible to you? No you did not, not according to the press reports - you waited for them to come to you and when they did not you want to pin the blame on them. Then you went on to a fundraiser.
You sent Ambassador Rice out to say the film was responsible. Had you not spoken to the State Department for 5 days? IF Rice and SoS Clinton went out, over the next week, without your permission or order we have a much bigger problem than blaming a film for the death of 4 Americans. The BUCK stops with you. Will you take responsibility?
That’s what I saw the other night, and wondered why it was not the headline of the evening. For me, it showed clear, premeditated collusion between the two.
Romney looked stunned, like his opponent had just asked the ref to deliver a rabbit punch, and she obliged.
To me, the dead giveaway of the set-up: when Obama said, “proceed, Governor.”
Obama knew at that instant that there was a good chance Romney would seize on the word “terror” and that Crowley was ready to assist.
Regrettable that Romney didn’t just move toward discussing Susan Rice, Jay Carney, The View etc.
Total set-up.
bttt
Obama and CNN colluded.
That is all.
“Git that transcript, then make me a chicken pot pie, woman!”
This fraud is being pushed because of 65 million viewers, who will not see the corrections next day.
At least she threw a curve-ball question to Obama:
I thought that was a fair question, didn't you?
What?
What do you mean I got it wrong?
Ohhhh......
Wow...And he had the oo to exclaim “say it louder”...when silence would have been the less obvious give away to the collusion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.