Congratulations Liz, you did it! You beat four white males to win this contest:
http://harvardlawschoolisbogus.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/elizabeth-warren-wins-our-vote/
You're the fauxest of the faux!
Posted on 09/09/2012 11:30:00 PM PDT by CountryClassSF
Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren, who has made her stated desire for a “level playing field” the cornerstone of her Senatorial campaign, once said she longed to win a contest on the basis of her beauty, physical attributes, and other criteria “unrelated to smarts” — including “knowing someone who can fix the outcome.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Neither are brains.
“I want to win a contest that has nothing to do with brains’’<. Liz honey, you won that a long time ago— the day your were born.
As a member of the native american tribe Fuaxhawks, I thought she was entitled to the seat without elections...
She never won a contest? I thought Indians were good at gambling.
Well if she wants beauty to be the metric, should we remind her that she's running against Cosmo beefcake?
Congratulations Liz, you did it! You beat four white males to win this contest:
http://harvardlawschoolisbogus.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/elizabeth-warren-wins-our-vote/
You're the fauxest of the faux!
Not my graphic, it is a linked photo on the blog. But you have a point.
Should say image instead of photo.
She won't win any beauty contests so I wonder exactly what she had in mond.
She’s got more beauty than brains, certainly but she’s uglier than suppurating wound.
Oh WOe is me... why's everybody always pickin on me??? 
To be fair (which the left never is to the right), I think this may be slightly positive. I think at the time she was trying to make the point that she got ahead based on brains and that for a change she would like to get ahead based on something else. It is common for pretty women to say things like “you only like me for my looks.” It is almost as common for plain women to want to be valued for their looks. I think that is what is at issue here.
I hate to see conservatives resort to put-downs, especially based on looks. It is her character that I object to, primarily her warped idea of “fairness.”
Follow-up.
Now that I’ve read the other article you posted, I have to wonder if she had any brains, either. Or maybe her flawed writing was yet another indicator of a flawed character. Did she “ddjust” the data to make it show what she wanted it to show so it would match her idea of “fairness?”
Maybe she should start a contest for “Most Demented Liar”. Although Nancy Pelosi might beat her in that contest, I’m sure she could be a runner up.
Tap dancing?
The bikers at Sturges have a few “events”she could compete in.
The long list of things that are NOT her strong suit also include her oratory skills. What a boring speech, with a flat and uninspiring delivery given at their convention!
Paleface Dizzy Lizzy Warren once won a Buffalo chip eating contest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.