Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney/Ryan or Bust! If you don't vote Romney this Nov. then you will be casting a vote for Obama
Canada Free Press ^ | September 7, 2012 | Jim O'Neill, former SEAL Team Two member

Posted on 09/07/2012 6:30:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

“Truth is the new hate speech.”—“Creeping Sharia”

“We [the people] own this country.”—Clint Eastwood

I feel like I ought to start out each of my articles anymore with a disclaimer, or caveat saying something along the lines of “WARNING: The contents of this article are to be considered null and void in the event of a “Reichstag Fire,” false flag event, and/or an invasion by Russian Spetsnaz in collusion with Northcom,“or words to that effect.

My intent is not to make light of such concerns, as God knows we have reason enough to be more than a bit edgy these days—what with the Patriot Act, NDAA, the torrent of Obama EOs (Executive Orders), various government agencies stockpiling millions of rounds of ammo, and other such things.

Personally, I am what you might call a cynical optimist—I hope for the best, but plan for the worst. I keep myself open to the idea that the US can peacefully pull itself out of the colossal mess that it is currently mired in—but I have enough guns, ammo, freeze dried food and whatnot to open a small survivalist store.

Be that as it may—the main topic that I wish to address in this article is my decision to back the Romney/Ryan ticket, and the fallout from that. Contrary to what some of you may think, I have not rushed off and enlisted in the “Dark Side.” I am as opposed to the Big Bank/ Big Corporation/Big Government/Big War cabal as ever...

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012; barackhusseinobama; cokevspepsi; conservatives; elections; islam; lping; mittromney; navy; obama; obamaistoast; oldearlgrayisfos; paulbots; preppers; romney; romneyryan2012; ronpaul; runpaul; ryan; time2choose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,001-1,012 next last
To: Loud Mime
RE :”Wow. Later tonight I might get as smart as you.

Thanks!

The material they provide helps a lot.

581 posted on 09/08/2012 11:21:08 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

“But how many lost jobs, homes, savings, etc. are you willing to sacrifice on your altar of purism?”

But let’s ask the converse question: how many unborn children are you willing to sacrifice on your altar of expediency and capitulation?

Let’s not just talk in the theoretical sense. Let’s put a hard number to it. One million? Two million?

There is a long term human cost to your decision as well.


582 posted on 09/09/2012 4:39:19 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

“Really can’t fathom the mind of an Abr”

And I can’t fathom the mind of an ASBo (Any Socialist But obama). And I’ve read plenty of alinsky and Machiavelli over time. Maybe I’m reading the wrong books? Unfortunately I’m not aware of any books written by benedict arnold or vikun quisling.


583 posted on 09/09/2012 4:42:55 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine; Manic_Episode

“I’ll blame you and your ilk if Zero is re-elected.”

Oooh! Will you blame me too? Please? Pretty please? You’re known not just by the friends you keep, but by the enemies as well.


584 posted on 09/09/2012 4:47:17 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat; muawiyah; Gilbo_3; Lakeshark; mkjessup; onyx; INVAR; reasonisfaith; bert; ...

———It’s just moral relativism writ very large.-——

No, that is a delusional rationalization.You have forgotten where you are.

You overlook one preeminent point. We or at least most of us, are Americans.

We have a political system in America wherein we have two political parties that encompass all the various coalitions. For the presidential slot, the various coalitions put forward candidates and the number is winnowed down to one per party. The various coalitions have their day. If they have strength, they win. If they lack strength they lose.

Some losers have decided that it is more important to exercise their own conservative vanity than it is to join American’s in having a presidential election


585 posted on 09/09/2012 4:50:38 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: DManA

“It is true that if there are 3 million conservatives like him who don’t vote for Romney Obama will win. But if 3 million conservatives find they can’t in good conscience vote for Romney I blame the people who shoved Romney down our throats. And I blame Romney for not being able to convince them.”

But to the willardite the problem is never with willard, it’s with those who refuse to bow low before him.


586 posted on 09/09/2012 4:50:43 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: bert
The general rule in coalition politics is that the candidates put forward for consideration would, in any case, be technically acceptable to the other coalition members ~ else why would they be coalition partners

In this situation we had a minority insurgency (that entity we call the GOP-e) who put forward yet another one of their groomed candidates who is not technically acceptable to SEVERAL of the larger coalition members ~ actually, the majority of the voting base of the Republican party.

Now that doesn't mean he can't win ~ almost anyone could beat Obama this year ~ but he will never have a settled time in office. The other coalition partners will make sure he has a quite miserable time ~ opposition to his every proposal will be automatic. I doubt you will ever see him at any large gatherings outside of the inaugural day festivities ~ which will see a record low turnout.

Both the Democrats and Republicans have some serious structural problems that will require serious reaffirmation of party label and the ejection of troublesome minorities.

587 posted on 09/09/2012 5:05:06 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

-—— actually, the majority of the voting base of the Republican party.——

There is one small problem with that statement. Leaving out Paul, and maybe he can actually be included, the majority of the primary voting base voted for Romney. That is, the combined votes for all the other significant candidates was not adequate to win.


588 posted on 09/09/2012 5:14:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: bert
(1) We didn't get a chance to vote in Virginia but we did end up with an historic low primary turnout ~ if that means anything to you.

(2) In the later primaries where nobody but Romney had the funds to run, the Romney supporters and Democrats voted for Romney anyway ~

We had a well financed minority insurgency capture the nomination without actually demonstrating they were able to represent the interests of the coalition partners.

In European politics, where the coalition politics takes place after the elections, not before them (as in America), what that would mean is a short-lived "Government" (or ruling clique) with a good chance of falling due to a lack of confidence over some quite mundane issues!

You people worked yourself into a quite unstable situation which will allow the most unpopular President of the last two centuries to win another term ~ your fault ~ not mine ~ no way this can be rectified either!

589 posted on 09/09/2012 5:33:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I know you're not the brightest bulb in the box, but was I not sufficiently clear?

I see you missed the deliberate irony.

This doesn't surprise me.

590 posted on 09/09/2012 5:44:09 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Science puts you on the moon, atheism puts you in the gulag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
There is a chance at least that prayers for Romney, and those in the GOP party will be influenced by God, either through their removal in November or throughout the following years due to earnest prayer.

If Romney is anything, it would be the judgment of God upon America.

Let's face it - we have two major party candidates who are against godliness and righteousness. Both of them are instruments for God's judgment, regardless of which one gets elected, since both of them are, at their root, opposed to God and His plan on earth.

Sure, the Assyrians might have been God's instrument of judgment on Israel, but that doesn't mean the Israelites had to vote for them.

Ultimately, folks like you are putting your faith in man and government, not in God - and this is true no matter how much highminded talk about "prayer" and "who can be influenced by God" you might want to make. The heart of the king is in the hand of the Lord. if God wanted, He could put Obama back into office, and then turn his heart completely 180 degrees around. I doubt that this will happen, but who knows. Ultimately, the matter is in God's hands, and it's up to me to simply vote my conscience, not vote "pragmatically" for somebody with bad charactre whose future actions I do not know.

591 posted on 09/09/2012 5:54:38 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Science puts you on the moon, atheism puts you in the gulag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
In the later primaries where nobody but Romney had the funds to run, the Romney supporters and Democrats voted for Romney anyway

It should be telling that in these later primaries, Romney still lost a significant share of the vote to competitors whose names were still on the ballot, even though they had formally dropped out weeks before. Here in North Carolina, Romney only got ~70%, despite being the only candidate left in the race at this point.

But yeah, this is the guy who's going to "unite" the Republican Party.

592 posted on 09/09/2012 5:57:10 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Science puts you on the moon, atheism puts you in the gulag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“This is a trustworthy saying, and everyone should accept it: “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners”—and I am the worst of them all.

Amen. In the eastern Church our prayer just prior to Communion ends with “O Lord forgive me for I have sinned without number.”


593 posted on 09/09/2012 6:03:21 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

“Which makes all this brow-beating by Romney operatives to intimidate anyone not supporting Romney as a ‘traitor’ deserving of death more than ridiculous considering what their political savior has already done to Conservatives.”

The willardites are engaging it just a little bit of projection don’t you think?

;-)


594 posted on 09/09/2012 6:05:50 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“With Romney or some other RINO we can at least influence him and will have some voices on our side in his cabinet & NSC.”

I respectfully disagree. Keep in mind that willard is calling the shots. Once willard wins, he will act to consolidate his power and conservatives need not apply.

Paul Ryan is an interesting case, but let’s recognize what the VP does under our system: he casts a vote in the Senate when and if there is a tie. That happens maybe 2 or 3 times a decade. I think a lot of this kerfuffle over Todd Akin is illustrative. willard jumped out and affirmed his support for abortion in some circumstances. Paul Ryan who has a stellar record on this issue was...where?

The silence was deafening.

That’s a sneak preview of what you can expect from a willard administration.

As for hussein, he has pretty much been outed.


595 posted on 09/09/2012 6:18:02 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard - he doesn't need to earn your vote, he's entitled to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
I have no doubt he, Romney, thinks he can lay a little prayer and counseling on the problem and it'll go away.

Sorry, you gots' ta' deliver an awful lot more than prayer and counseling.

His peeps screwed up the primary so much here in Virginia the state committee has decided to hold a CONVENTION next year to pick the Gubernatorial candidate!

"The Cooch" will probably win.

596 posted on 09/09/2012 6:30:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: bert; All
We or at least most of us, are Americans.

We have a political system in America wherein we have two political parties that encompass all the various coalitions. For the presidential slot, the various coalitions put forward candidates and the number is winnowed down to one per party. The various coalitions have their day. If they have strength, they win. If they lack strength they lose. [emphasis mine, mkj]

Some losers have decided that it is more important to exercise their own conservative vanity than it is to join Americans in having a presidential election.


Bert? Your wise words demand a major
*** BUMP ***

The two party system is what we have. Unless and until a true and viable party can be organized, FINANCED, and offer a legitimate 50-State alternative, we have no other option than to work with what we've got. If others, with their perceived superior principles and moral values than the rest of us poor slobs want to take their ball (vote) and go home, the incumbents at any moment could not be happier about it, because incumbency provides an automatic advantage in being re-elected.

This election IS an election for national survival, make no mistake about it. If 0bama achieves the 'Rat goal of another term in office, we may very well NOT be having this discussion (or ANY discussion) when 2016 rolls around. For those who are foolish enough to believe that 'we can survive 0bama', they need to ask themselves one simple question:

"Is there ANY subversive and traitorous act that 0bama is NOT capable of, especially in a second term where there will never be another election to stop him?"

Think about it, and when you reach the only possible conclusion, you can either choose to be a patriot and pull that lever for Romney & Ryan, or you can take your vote, waste it (or not even cast it), and go home.
597 posted on 09/09/2012 6:44:58 AM PDT by mkjessup (The so-called "Dean of Discipline" is just a 'torqued'-off Illinois punk, you know, like 0bama, lol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: LaserJock
Watching from afar what the feds are doing to my beloved home state has me wondering how much Texans are prepared to endure. The state I knew would be in near rebellion by now.

Except, I think, for the Foat Wuth Startlegram and the Lubbock Avalanche-Express, the Texas press is now fairly well locked up in the yellowy claws of a cabal of J-school Leftists, the kind of people that lecture us to be tolerant of homosexuals who like to snatch kids' underwear and bugger junior-varsity boys in the showers.

Texas big-city papers are a sour, sorry joke any more, and they uniformly counsel Texans to despair of our remedies and lie down for notorious Communists like Obama.

598 posted on 09/09/2012 6:47:07 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Just a ridiculous argument MK ~ and you know it. If your boy had actually been able to crush the opposition in the primaries and draw the Republican base to him you wouldn't be here more than two weeks after his coronation accusing opponents of anything ~ because there'd be no opponents.

Think about being in that situation ~ even the Eisenhower campaign didn't have this problem although the Taft Republicans were still riding high at the time ~ they could accept IKE as Supreme Allied Commander and as President.

You have a failed candidate who has no one he allows to be around him who knows how to win this race.

599 posted on 09/09/2012 6:49:03 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Being lectured by the subalterns of a guy whose family has never in recorded history had a member in the military about patriotism is a laugh.

The solution is to expel the dishonest minority (the GOP-e) from the party and move on. You people are less than 15% of our voting base, and I am sure that when your faithless leaders are shed, you will see the patriotic wisdom in that movement and step quickly into line lest you, too, be outed!

600 posted on 09/09/2012 6:55:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,001-1,012 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson