Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would ‘President Romney’ really mean for gun owners?
Monachus Lex ^ | September 2, 2012 | John Pierce

Posted on 09/02/2012 7:56:38 PM PDT by JohnPierce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2012 7:56:40 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

If a bear attacks me in woods, I would rather have an assault rifle than a handgun.


2 posted on 09/02/2012 8:04:39 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

“While the NRA has not endorsed Governor Romney”

No, but they got a little to cozy with Harry Reid for my taste. I will add that I am a long time NRA member.


3 posted on 09/02/2012 8:06:27 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

Looks like we all get to shoot ourselves in the foot this year. But at least we get a choice of which foot......


4 posted on 09/02/2012 8:11:32 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

Romney will do what is best for Romney.

What is best for Romney is to support gun rights.

This was not true in MA.

It is true, now.


5 posted on 09/02/2012 8:15:11 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Amen to that. There was a recent bear attack on the news (I can’t remember where) and the details were chilling.


6 posted on 09/02/2012 8:17:40 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Yap, simple politics. One can’t get rich swimming against the current.


7 posted on 09/02/2012 8:18:29 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

I will give them credit for being savvy on that however. With both houses temporarily in Democrat hands, having the Majority Leader owing you favors is a good thing even if he isn’t your best friend.


8 posted on 09/02/2012 8:19:03 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

When all is said and done I think you pegged it. And in far fewer words than I used. :)


9 posted on 09/02/2012 8:20:06 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Whatever Romney does is better than what Hillary and Obama plan by giving our gun rights to the UN.


10 posted on 09/02/2012 8:23:33 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

I am sorry but after the NRA endorsed Harry Reid, they lost all credibility on the issue of being for Gun Owners. They are now just another political fund raising scam more interested in access to political power then the facts.


11 posted on 09/02/2012 8:31:33 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench; JohnPierce

Romney agrees with us 75% of the time, Obama agrees with us 0% so of course you “uber Conservatives” race around here trash talking Romney

Are you people really this politically stupid? Romney or Obama will be the next President. Spending all your time trash talking Romney does one thing, helps Obama

You people are the useful idiots of the Democrat propaganda machine.


12 posted on 09/02/2012 8:34:10 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I wasn’t ‘trash talking’ Romney. But I was pointing out his past failings where gun rights are concerned. You will note that my conclusion was that Romney will be much better for gun rights than allowing Obama a second term. I believe that!

And I am an uber Libertarian, not an uber Conservative. :)


13 posted on 09/02/2012 8:40:35 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

This is the wrong argument, wrong way to look at it. The second amendment guarantees the government will not infringe on our God given right to self defense. I do not have to justify firearms ownership based on need. That is so important I’ll say it again. We do not have to justify exercising our rights based on need. No one hands you an abridged dictionary and says “sure you have first amendment rights, but you have no need of words over three syllables...” I may never need a magazine fed semiautomatic rifle. But i absolutely need the freedom to own one if I choose to, because the moment we don’t have that freedom, we start surrendering more and more freedoms.


14 posted on 09/02/2012 8:41:07 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Absolutely.


15 posted on 09/02/2012 8:41:07 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

What would ‘President Romney’ really mean for gun owners?
______________________________________________

Willard the Wind Checker still has his finger in the air...


16 posted on 09/02/2012 8:41:14 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

Consider another term under Obama.

Visualize it fully.

Now, contribute to the Romnutz campaign, ‘cause he’s better than Obama - far better.

Don’t forget to contribute to the real conservatives running for local, state, and federal offices.


17 posted on 09/02/2012 8:46:18 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I think ‘President Romney’ would mean dozens of federal court judges at all levels who can be counted upon to rule ‘pro-gun’ when the issue arises.

I think ‘President Romney’ would mean we wouldn’t have to spend the next 4 years waiting for the other shoe to drop when President Obama finally turns his gaze upon private gun ownership.

I think ‘President Romney’ means at least 4 years of continued gains.

But I do not mistake that for Romney being a stalwart champion of gun rights. That’s all I was trying to say in the article.


18 posted on 09/02/2012 8:47:34 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

“What would ‘President Romney’ really mean for gun owners?
______________________________________________

Willard the Wind Checker still has his finger in the air...”

He is just demonstrating his well practiced “Positional Versatility”.


19 posted on 09/02/2012 8:48:03 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Well said!


20 posted on 09/02/2012 8:49:19 PM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson