Posted on 07/26/2012 12:18:07 PM PDT by Kfobbs
Somebody please cue the correct “Blue Helmet” response. I’m too lazy.
Obama the marxist/democrat will sigh this UN treaty.Obama wants the UN to control Americans.
I’m ready for the 2nd American Revolution or CW2.
...they trust the Iranians with nukes, but not citizens with guns?
I don’t trust a government that doesn’t trust its own citizens.
Uhmmmmmm......come and disarm Southerners???? There had better be a lot of them. Don’t think so.
The UN can shove it up their smelly, sceptic, smelly, greasy, slimy Obamas.
Extract.
Shove again.
Repeat (ad infinitum)
No.
He will sign it, of course. To be legal here in the US, it has to be ratified by 2/3 of the Senate. He will TRY to subvert this process by Executive Order, but I, like many others will just flat ass ignore it.
He will have to have his minions review each and every, business-held Form 4473 which documents gun purchases. He won’t surmount the legal challenges to his illegal attempts to access the data. Likewise, he won’t be able to determine those weapons not covered by Forms 4473 (private purchases, etc.)....do not comply is my advice.
Obama the marxist/democrat will sign this UN treaty.Obama wants the UN to control Americans.
Im ready for the 2nd American Revolution or CW2.
The UN are just a bunch of evil socialists . No wonder Obama is for them.
Didn’t we also sign a treaty that makes Obama dictator for life? And another treaty that bans the Republican party from existing?
Somehow I don’t see this flying past the SCOTUS. You can not re-write the constitution through treaty.
A treaty cannot be used to circumvent the Bill of Rights.
BWhahhahahahahahaha, NO.
What would you do if you woke up one morning and turned on the news and heard that the President signed a UN treaty outlawing the private ownership of firearms in the United States. What would you do if you had a brother,sister or father or grandfather that was an avid gun owner and the UN or local police took them away for the fact that they owned fire arms and refused to give them up? Well when you wake up tomorrow morning the 27th of July 2012 The President will have most likely signed that treaty. And we are one step closer to being a dictatorship.
Let us all not forget history. Germany first act of Adolph Hitler ban gun ownership, 6 millions jews killed, 50 million people killed in WW2. Stalin no one was armed in the Soviet Union, 20 million Ukrainians dead. Mao 100 million Chinese killed. Ect ect. (Those that forget the Past are bound to repeat it). Molon Labe (come and take it)!
I posted this on my facebook page and have only gotten two likes and one comment. People don’t care. They care about their Starbucks and American Idol. We are a lost Nation. I weep for America.
“To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
—George Mason (1725-1792), June 14, 1788, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution, in_Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution,_ Jonathan Elliot, ed., v.3 p.380 (Philadelphia, 1836) <>
Written to identify the Obama’s of the United States of America.
No.
FMCDH...
The United Nations ... the United States and a bunch of third World Dictators that we fund. I support leaving the UN and see how long that thing lasts without us.
“Obama the marxist/democrat will sigh this UN treaty.Obama wants the UN to control Americans.
Im ready for the 2nd American Revolution or CW2.”
___
See Tag Line!
The UN Wants Complete Control Over The Internet And That Would Mean Unprecedented Censorship, Taxes And Surveillance
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/06/22/will-un-regulate-internet-battle-for-net-freedom-nears/
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/05/30/united-nations-internet-regulation/
Nor does a treaty override the constitution.
Alexander Hamilton, stated that “A treaty cannot be made which alters the Constitution of the country, or which infringes any express exceptions to the power of the Constitution...” James Madison, a primary author of the Constitution: “I do not conceive that power is given to the President and the Senate to dismember the empire, or to alienate any great, essential right. I do not think the whole legislative authority to have this power.” Finally, Thomas Jefferson’s assessment: “I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of the treaty-making power as boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.”
Treaties do not override the Constitution
In anticipation that our president may sign one or more treaties that conflict with the U.S. Constitution’s limited grant of power, several voices of alarm are contending that a treaty can override, or in effect amend, our Constitution. Although that view has gained some currency, it is a myth that contradicts the intent of those who framed the Constitution and it violates any reasonable interpretation of the constitution.
United States treaties are created when proposed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The power of the President and the Senate, in their treaty-making capacity, was never intended to be a power greater than the Constitution. Per their oath of office: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.