Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List (notification of new articles). FReepmail me to get on or off.
Posted on 07/01/2012 5:18:32 AM PDT by expat1000
"There is no more neutrality in the world," said Black Panther leader, civil rights activist and fun-loving rapist; Eldridge Cleaver. "You either have to be part of the solution, or you're going to be part of the problem-- there ain't no more middle ground."
We live in Eldridge Cleaver's world now, a world with no more middle ground. Where not doing anything does not mean you will be left alone. This is no longer a nation founded on the curious premise that the government should leave people alone unless they are causing problems.
That peculiar idea was held by a nation of farmers and merchants who fled religious persecution, and whose great contribution to human history was the notion that governments shouldn't be all-powerful and that everyone should mind their own business when it comes to other people's affairs. Our present-day rulers revile them as racist slave owners who only cared about money, but they also happen to be racist slave owners who only care about money, and they have far more of both.
The average American still holds the fanciful belief that, if he isn't annoying anyone, he should be left alone. To the people running his country, this is as bizarre and unworkable as Phrenology or the Geocentric theory or handing out universal health care without also compelling everyone to buy it.
This is not a nation where people are left alone anymore. This is a nation where they are hounded from the moment they are born until the moment they die by the arms of a regulatory state run by men and women weaned on Cleaver, Alinsky, Fourier, Marx, Wells and countless others. This is a nation, where accordingly, being left alone is the greatest of luxuries.
It takes a lot of money to be left alone. Regulatory space is much more expensive than physical space, and buying it requires investing in lobbyists, fundraisers and lawyers. If you make the right payoffs, then you can buy the privilege of being left alone, exempted from regulations, going uninspected and protected against the agents of the state. But once you do that, you are no longer neutral. You have bought yourself the privilege of not being considered the problem; instead, you have become part of the solution for the people you are paying off.
The Americans bushwacked by ObamaCare, the scam artist's dream of a tax paid to a third-party in exchange for benefits accrued to a fourth party, still thought they had the freedom to take the middle, to despise meddling politicians in both parties, ignore most things the government did, while living their own lives. They had seen their savings devalued, their homes seized, their lives bedeviled by a thousand regulations, but they still thought that it was possible to take a middle-ground, to reject the solutions by asserting that they are not the problem.
They did not understand that in Cleaverland, in Alinskytown and in Obamaville-- no one opts out. Either you volunteer of you get drafted. Raise your hand or you will be called on anyway. Not volunteering to be part of their agenda means that you are the problem.
You, sitting right there in your chair, watching these words move across your screen, are the problem. A problem 311,591,917 human souls strong. You eat too much or you don't pay enough taxes, you drive your car too often, you haven't bought solar panels for your roof, you browse extremist websites when you should be browsing government informational sites for tips on how to do or not do all of the above. But most of all... you still don't understand what a great problem you are for the people running this country into the ground between the Atlantic and the Pacific. They keep trying to solve you, but you don't go away.
There is no neutrality when dealing with people who reject the very concept of neutrality. Who draw everyone into the long columns of their spreadsheets and catch everyone in their spider's web. There is no middle ground with people who don't believe there is a middle ground, who believe that every human on earth is part of the problem and can only opt out of being the problem by joining up with them and following their directives.
That is what we are up against. We confront the Great Solvers of the Human Problem who are determined to arrange everyone and everything to their liking. They began by controlling everything that people did. Now, they have moved on to controlling what people don't do. If you live, if you breathe, if you stir, move your muscles, track moving objects with your eyes, then there are obligations imposed on you.
ObamaCare is one of the final declarations that there is no opting out. Even if you don't drive, own a home, own a business, own a dog, or do one of the infinite things that bring you into mandatory contact with the apparatus of your local, semi-local, trans-local, national or global government, you are committed to a task from maturity to death. Your mission is to obtain health insurance, and, in a system in which you become the ward of the government as soon as you taste air, it is the price that you pay for being alive.
In a free country, you are not obligated to do things simply for the privilege of breathing oxygen north of the Rio Grande and south of Niagara Falls. But this isn't a free country anymore; this is a country in which you get things for free. And there is a big difference between those two things.
We are a nation in which everyone is entitled to everything, except the right to opt out of all the entitlements and the cost of paying for them. We may not have the Bill of Rights anymore, but we have a hell of a bill to settle and, every year, the deficits keep making it bigger and bigger. Our forefathers passed on to us a Bill of Rights, and we shall pass on to our descendants a Bill. A tremendous Bill which can be unrolled from the mountains to the prairies to the oceans white with foam... and all the way across the ocean to China.
The Bill of Rights was a list of things that the government could not do. The Bill is a list of things that the government has done. It's an endless bill, because we have an endless government that is doing things all the time. And though we didn't do any of them, we are still stuck with the bill. Even if we could reach into our pockets and settle the bill with a couple of loose trillion dollar bills, this Bill doesn't just demand money, it demands power.
If all that government officials did was go to Vegas, give each other prizes and sing silly songs, then the Bill would be large, but it wouldn't ask for a piece of our soul. But the amount of money that the government spends is almost beside the point. The amount may bankrupt us, it may destroy our economy, it may turn us into debt slaves-- but it's secondary to how the money is being used. It's bad enough to be eaten out of house and home-- worse to be forced to feed the occupying army that is taking away your freedoms one by one.
People often talk about the First and Second Amendments, the Fifth comes up, and even the Fourth. But how often do we think about the Third Amendment, that old relic of a time when we were ruled by a distant power with no concern for our lives or our freedoms? "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner". It's one of the few amendments that goes unnoticed. No one challenges it. No Supreme Court blots it out with the stroke of a pen or rephrases it to mean that there is a Constitutional right to abortion or a ban on executing juveniles.
There is no occupying army quartered in our homes. They have sizable barracks with marble floors, gleaming chandeliers and metal detectors through which you must pass in order to meet with even one of their lower officers. They aren't quartered in your living room, they rent hotel names and build buildings and send the bill to you. And then they send you another bill, which informs you that they have decided that the War on Obesity, the War on Health Care or the War on the Economy requires you to do a set number of things, the costs of both the doing and the enforcement to be borne by you.
The old kings used to play chess games with human chess pieces, a metaphor for how they saw their power over their subjects. The new kings or czars play with hundreds of millions of chess pieces. They assess how many pieces they have in a census, determine what kind of pieces they are and pass laws telling them where to move, what to buy and how to live. And they are no more tolerant of pawns who fail to move when ordered to; than the old kings playing human chess in their gardens.
In the last century, the Great Solvers went to work on a national and global game of human chess. They called this game by various names, The New Deal, the New Frontier, Hope and Change, or, most commonly, Social Justice. The real name of the game is "There Ain't No More Middle Ground". Either you are a New Dealer, a New Frontierer, a Hope and Changer, a Tolerator, a Liberal, a Donor, an Activist and an Organizer-- or you are on the wrong side.
You might think that you are standing in the great moderate middle, the open-minded frontier of the old American, but the frontier and ground are both gone. There is only Problemtown and Solutionville and the bulldozers are coming to knock down Problemtown next week and deport its residents to Solutionville.
ObamaCare is the bus to Solutionville. It is the problem that is "You" being solved in the same inept brute-force fashion in which the Great Solvers solve everything, from Russian agriculture to European Union democracy.
The problems are many, and the Solvers are impatient. There are too many peasants, and weekends are too short, the golf courses are too crowded, the protesters are too annoying, and the numbers never add up. Each problem keeps needing to be solved many times, but they have already moved on to the next problem and the one after that in the great mass of problems that some people still call America.
The American Bushwhacked still wonder what happened. When did this stop being a free country? Then they finish pumping their gas, buy their sodas, paying several taxes on each and completing a transaction for two commodities whose production and distribution involve more laws than the entire legal codes of Rome and Greece combined, and then drive home, where they begin making notes for next year's taxes, while reading how the latest laws will affect them.
On the television, an anchor with carefully molded hair and the grave look of the career idiot who has learned to disguise this fact by always appearing concerned about something, interviews an activist who is proposing new regulations as the only responsible thing to do. "If you aren't part of the solution," she says with equally grave sincerity, "then you are part of the problem."
The American Bushwhacked nod along because the proposal seems so reasonable. Who doesn't want to do something for the children, the oceans, the endangered red-banded shrub, the people somewhere who don't have something and that sincere young woman who really seems passionate in a way that few are anymore. Then he turns back to his desk, somewhere in the great middle ground that once was, studies the tax forms again and wonders when this stopped being a free country.
Daniel Greenfield is quickly moving up to a spot in my very favorite commentators list.
I especially love this line;
We may not have a Bill of Rights anymore, but we have a hell of a bill to settle.
Sickening because it is so true.
bttt
This is really well written.
The money line:
“There is no neutrality when dealing with people who reject the very concept of neutrality. Who draw everyone into the long columns of their spreadsheets and catch everyone in their spider’s web. There is no middle ground with people who don’t believe there is a middle ground, who believe that every human on earth is part of the problem and can only opt out of being the problem by joining up with them and following their directives.”
Yes, it is very well written, it is the first thing I have read in some time that makes me really envious of the writer. I sit here and realize that I have thought all of that but never managed to say it half so well.
This is one of those articles by Greenfield that has numerous ‘money lines’.
It one of those that he really outdoes himself, although they are not all that rare.
I would have huge respect for anyone that could turn out an article like this just once, but he does it many times a year, as well as others almost, but not quite, as impressive 3/4 times a week. As far as I am concerned, he’s in a class by himself.
You might think that you are standing in the great moderate middle, the open-minded frontier of the old American, but the frontier and ground are both gone. There is only Problemtown and Solutionville and the bulldozers are coming to knock down Problemtown next week and deport its residents to Solutionville.
ObamaCare is the bus to Solutionville.
ObamaCare is the train to FinalSolutionville.
Thanks for posting. One of the best essays I’ve read in a long time.
might enjoy this
“”There is no more neutrality in the world,” said Black Panther leader”
This is probably the only thing I could ever agree with that was said by a Black Panther leader.
All those people that sat out the election last year and are threatening to do it again this year are in essence the people that are giving the left a voice.
I dread the day when we have lost our freedoms and I hear someone say that it wasn’t their fault because they didn’t vote for the Republican nominee .... my head will explode.
Basically you are with us or against us.
This is not a nation where people are left alone anymore. This is a nation where they are hounded from the moment they are born until the moment they die by the arms of a regulatory state run by men and women weaned on Cleaver, Alinsky, Fourier, Marx, Wells and countless others. This is a nation, where accordingly, being left alone is the greatest of luxuries.
2nd that. Him, Steyn, VDH, Bill Whittle. The list goes down pretty quickly from there.
And Rush just discovered Greenfield last week. Rush can read Greenfield and better his show.
This is not a nation where people are left alone anymore. This is a nation where they are hounded from the moment they are born until the moment they die by the arms of a regulatory state run by men and women weaned on Cleaver, Alinsky, Fourier, Marx, Wells and countless others. This is a nation, where accordingly, being left alone is the greatest of luxuries.
And that is why we read people like Greenfield, isn't it? To help us clarify our thoughts.
The only point of difference I have with Greenfield is I would change nation to world. It's not just the USA. In fact, as bad as it is getting, it's probably better than most of the rest of the world.
Yup. That was good. And depressing, because it is completely true. It also brings to mind the question which I have pondered a while, of exactly when this country did cease to be a free country. I'd have to say that it was probably either sometime in the 60s or 70s, though a compelling case can be made that you should probably look to the "new deal" Certainly, some major planks for the edifice of the state were laid at that time, though it took a while for them to really take effect because the inertia that had to be overcome was pretty massive. Some of us would say that if you wanted to pick a single point in time, the year 1913 is probably the most pivotal for several reasons, though you really need look no farther than the changes made in the Constitution that year to understand its character.
The "new deal" was almost certainly the last major push down the road that was actually accurately labelled. I say this because the term itself brings up a question: what was the "old deal"? I would propose that the "old deal" was the one set up under the Constitution. The "new deal" was nothing less than the overthrow of the old. No longer were we a (reasonably) free people with only limited interactions with the government. With the advent of the New Deal, your life and interactions with your fellow citizens could be micromanaged to ever finer and finer levels. Under the terms of the Old Deal, your life, liberty, and property were largely under your own control to do with as you saw fit. Under the New Deal, the government could tell a farmer how many acres of grain he could plant, even if he wanted to make use of it to feed his own animals, because somehow, under this New Deal, grain that would never leave a 50-acre farm can somehow "affect" interstate commerce.
Sadly, the formerly free individuals accepted the chains laid upon them because they didn't seem so terribly burdensome in light of the national emergency of the Great Depression. That such nation emergencies were unknown at least in the same scale in the financial world prior to the institution of the Federal Reserve was conveniently overlooked by those who had assumed the reins of power. Yes, prior to the coming of the Federal reserve, we had periods of inflation and deflation. It was sold to the people in the name of doing away with the 'evils' of the business cycle, amongst other things. Does anyone seriously believe this lie today? No? Well you'll notice it is still in business, and still interfering in the financial markets to the benefit of it's owners.
I guess I'm rambling a bit because this article hit a bit too close to home. As I don't believe I have ever lived in a 'free' country, I don't know why its passing can still get me riled up.
In brief, I think another reposting of this image pretty much sums up my thoughts:
I’ve been mulling your reply regarding the time frame. Like you I have never lived under complete freedom; I have experienced enough freedom from government interference to mourn its loss. I suspect some come into the world inherently less accepting of trading freedom for the illusion of security. I frequently wonder what happened, why, and when did it start.
IMHO, while the Civil War started the expansion of big central government at the expense of state’s rights, I agree with you that 1913 was probably a pivotal point for the actual intrusion into the lives average Americans.
I’ve been reading a lot about cultural marxism aka political correctness. Coupled with the changes in government a form of soft brainwashing has slowly, deliberately infiltrated our institutions replacing our traditional culture and ethics with political correctness.
The Fabian Society and its spiritual heir, the Frankfurt School, have been very cunning in their exploitation of the dark side and the weaknesses of human nature.
Here’s my take:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2889153/posts?page=36#36
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.