Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Not all attractive young women want to dress up like trollops.
1 posted on 06/27/2012 9:25:59 AM PDT by CHRISTIAN DIARIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

2 posted on 06/27/2012 9:30:38 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Why didn't she just quit and leave it at that? What if she didn't agree to a menu change, or if the restaurant started to cater to homosexuals?

I applaud her decision to NOT want to wear scanty uniforms, but a lawsuit is the wrong direction. A privately-owned business should be able to make legal changes in how they do business. If she doesn't like the changes, she can leave.

3 posted on 06/27/2012 9:31:11 AM PDT by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I have mixed feelings about this story. First, as a Christian I applaud and support this young woman for her stand, and for refusing to expose herself and give up her modesty just to keep her job.

That being said, I disagree with her decision to sue the employer. The employer has the right to change the working conditions, including hours of work and work uniform. If she does not like those changes, she has the right to quit. But to sue over those changes indicates that she believes that she had a RIGHT to that job under HER conditions.


4 posted on 06/27/2012 9:35:14 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I applaud her decision and agree with the unpaid wages and
wrongful determination. She would probably win the sexual harrassment charge b/c of the creation of a hostile work environment.

I just happen to think that the law regarding sexual harrassment is too broad and too vague. I don’t agree with that charge.


15 posted on 06/27/2012 9:49:29 AM PDT by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
But I do know an act of Godliness when I see it.

"Godliness" is suing a company when you don't like the working conditions there anymore?

Wow.

17 posted on 06/27/2012 9:52:31 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I pray she loses. Then goes to work somewhere else.


19 posted on 06/27/2012 9:58:41 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

“Scaramella”

What a beautiful Italian surname. Just flows off your tongue.


23 posted on 06/27/2012 10:01:25 AM PDT by duckman (Go Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

If she works in an at-will employment state she is pretty much SOL.


24 posted on 06/27/2012 10:09:00 AM PDT by gdani (I don't vote for liberals - no matter what letter appears after their name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

While I’m all for her saying no to the uniform change her lawsuit it silly. The uniform is the uniform, you wear it or you’re out. It’s not sexual harassment to fire somebody who won’t wear the provided uniform, even if they’re right to not wear it. That’s the voluntary nature of the employer/ employee relationship, either party can sever it.


27 posted on 06/27/2012 10:12:23 AM PDT by discostu (Listen, do you smell something?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Kudos to the gal for refusing to get tramped up, but the fact of the matter is she doesn’t have a right to that job. If she want’s to dress modestly she can open her own restaurant and call it “Wholesome Pie” or some such.


29 posted on 06/27/2012 10:13:55 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

M/A ping.

Looks like FReepers are divided 50/50. Some argure for the restaurant. Some for Courtney.


31 posted on 06/27/2012 10:21:56 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I was reading the other day that these “breasteraunts” have experienced a 33% sales increase over past year, the only restaurant segment to be doing well. So no stopping this as an overall trend it seems.


33 posted on 06/27/2012 10:25:07 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

She’s a beautiful girl.
I hope she finds success in life somewhere else.


35 posted on 06/27/2012 10:32:02 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

The uniform in question - for those who are curious. I would not have wanted my wife, daughters, or mother to wear it.

36 posted on 06/27/2012 10:32:15 AM PDT by Pollster1 (A boy becomes a man when a man is needed - John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Bet they get bigger tips. God Bless America!

53 posted on 06/27/2012 11:14:20 AM PDT by McGruff (Support your local Republican candidates. They are our last line of defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
What is wrong with this?


60 posted on 06/27/2012 11:41:21 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

1 Corinthians 6:1.


61 posted on 06/27/2012 11:42:14 AM PDT by Crawdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Looks like there are a lot of people here arguing in favor of the principle behind the law and not the law itself. The law may violate the principle, but if you oppose it, fight the law and not the waitress. The waitress in question is not responsible for creating the law. According to the existing laws, she has a case of wrongful termination since the employer wanted to either cut down her clothing or her hours.

I am not in favor of the law. Nor do I consider the termination "wrongful" based on the principle. I am also for property rights and the right of business owners to run their businesses as they see fit, but those who do not fault the law and instead fault the waitress are missing the point.

The truth is that property rights in this country have been trampled with the help of judges appointed by Republican presidents. The idiot Scalia thinks that growing your own plants affects interstate commerce and so the government should control gardening activities.

62 posted on 06/27/2012 11:43:14 AM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

While I applaude her for NOT wearing the new outfit, I disagree with her decision to sue.

She does not have a ‘right’ to work there.

Businesses change all the time. If they decided to change INTO a hooter franchise, what would she have done? Sue them to force them not to?

Kudos for holding onto her morals, but she needs a lesson in private property, and I am available to give her one any time at all~!!!!!!!!!!


78 posted on 06/27/2012 1:18:56 PM PDT by Mr. K (I AM WRITING-IN PALIN/GINGRICH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Sue me, sue you. It’s interesting how people who complain about the American judicial system, frivolous lawsuits, ambulance chasers like the Edwards couple, etc, all of a sudden say “oh, but in this case sue them for all they’ve got!”, and for each of us it’s a different “in this case”, so that the cumulative effect is the corrupt judicial system we’ve got ourselves! Mirror, mirror!


124 posted on 06/27/2012 6:56:51 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson