Posted on 04/06/2012 1:43:13 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
Two years, three months, and seven days after his inauguration, Barack Obama finally offered evidence to prove his eligibility for the presidency. On the White House website, officials posted an electronic document purported to be a scan of Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate. It was a grand "I told you so" moment for the media and the left, which had worked feverishly to marginalize "birthers" as the radical counterpart of the zany "truther."
Of course, there was never really any parity. Truthers constructed silly conspiracy theories about George W. Bush being an international super-criminal that orchestrated impossibly complex measures to frame al-Qaeda on 9/11. Birthers, on the other hand, merely demanded that the president, who is required by the Constitution to be a natural born American citizen, show proof of his eligibility. And in reality, that is an entirely reasonable expectation, albeit unprecedented.
Nonetheless, birthers were marginalized as fringe elements, and since the release of the electronic scan of the birth certificate, the concerns of birthers have become even more ignored in the public discourse. As an example of the how the media now views the birther movement, consider that the Huffington Post describes it as a "controversy that has been widely debunked but which remains alive in the eyes of some conservatives."
New evidence, however, has reignited conservative interest in Obama's birth certificate. Conservative icon Sherriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona, at the behest of a petition presented by the Surprise, Arizona Tea Party organization, organized a "cold case posse" and completed a six-month examination of the released birth certificate in order to determine its authenticity. The results are in, Joe says, and they point to the document being a fake.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Maybe not, but this mere "law" as a trigger mechanism, carries specific definitions and executable penalties.
Penalties for Failure to Register for the Draft
Men who do not register could be prosecuted and, if convicted, fined up to $250,000 and/or serve up to five years in prison. In addition, men who fail to register with Selective Service before turning age 26, even if not prosecuted, will become ineligible for:
Student Financial Aid - including Pell Grants, College Work Study, Guaranteed Student/Plus Loans, and National Direct Student Loans.
(Hmmmmm...)
U.S. Citizenship - if the man first arrived in the U.S. before his 26th birthday.
(Hmmmmm again)
Federal Jobs - men born after December 31, 1959 must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service.
Looks pretty cut and dried...add any racketeering/election fraud/treason charges you want, and extrapolate that criminal case.
He will!
Here is the website to help Sheriff Joe get re-elected.
Eric Holder and the rest of the usual suspects are trying to get Joe out of office.
Donate here:
http://www.americansforsheriffjoe.com/
“Donate here:
http://www.americansforsheriffjoe.com/ “
Thanks for the link. I will send the sheriff some “Go get ‘em!” funds.
B U M P
B U M P
They sealed all of Obama’s records, because any one of them would prove he is a fraud. He’s a ghost.
Who you gonna call?
AKA: Cold Case Posse
: )
Your US Senator is as dumb if not part of the conspiracy to pawn off such a shallow deceitful reading of Constitutional citizenship. The 14th Amendment speaks to the simple class of ‘citizens’. The Constitution mandates a more specific and restricted ‘natural born citizen’ for POTUSA. There are many in Congress and even in the courts and military who prefer your Senator’s comprehension for one reason or others. Few public officials are elected because of their knowledge of the Constitution or desire for such.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.