To: Free ThinkerNY
I’d just say to the student “What have you done for him lately?”
To: Free ThinkerNY
Just went to lunch with my daughter. We both drank water instead of a soft drink. Felt healthier when I finished.
I can play that boycott game too, Coke.
3 posted on
04/05/2012 11:34:04 AM PDT by
vg0va3
To: Free ThinkerNY
"Of course, even a Con Law professor focusing on the Bill of Rights should know that the principle of judicial review has been alive and well since 1803, so I still feel like my educational credentials have been tarnished a bit by the Presidents unprecedented, extraordinary remarks..." When you trust a liberal to lead a class the result is students are taught 'what' to think, not how to think.
4 posted on
04/05/2012 11:34:43 AM PDT by
Baynative
(Please check this out - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFIcZkEzc8I)
To: Free ThinkerNY
This is the first and only complaint about prof Obama there, Perry Mason?
you should get a lawyer to sue for a refund. Then use the proceeds to learn a trade.
To: Free ThinkerNY
my own constitutional law professor
Obama is not now, and never was a ‘law professor’. There is no documented proof that he ever graduated from anything even high school, much less that he was ever a professor.
He is a fraud and a liar. The Leftists at Harvard had him hanging around as a token. And I guess it has been said that he guest lectured a couple of times. As always with everything about Obama, this is another undocumented and unproven claim.
I'm surprised they resurrected this ‘law professor’ nonsense. It has be shown to be a completely undocumented claim. And frankly, I'm tired of hearing it. It is insulting to all of us.
Why didn't they just make him an astronaut, or a race car driver? He never did that either. What's the difference.
6 posted on
04/05/2012 11:56:54 AM PDT by
240B
(he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
To: Free ThinkerNY
When Brit Hume, (much to my dismay) earlier this week, referred to B. Hussein Obama as a “Constitutional Scholar” on Greta’s show, I almost fell out of my chair in disbelief. Calling him a “Constitutional Scholar” is like saying my 12 year old daughter is fluent in Quantum Mechanics. It’s a truly silly (and wholly untrue) statement.
7 posted on
04/05/2012 12:11:09 PM PDT by
Pagey
(B. Hussein Obama is weak, and is a worse human being than F.D.R., on multiple levels.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I am enjoying every bit of this comedy. See my new tag line.
8 posted on
04/05/2012 12:29:39 PM PDT by
BAW
(I heart the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Interesting details about the DOJ lawyer. Her name is Dana Lydia Kaersvang from the Law Firm of Morrison & Foerster. A few lawyers from this firm have been placed in the Obama Administration. Most of the information on their donations are funneled into the
Morrison & Foester Foundation, where publicly they state their donations are only to nonprofits. Digging deeper, however shows the firm is neck deep in the highest levels of the Obama Adminstration:
From Open Secrets:
Morrison & Foester Obama Political Donations
From the same site are the breakdowns of political donations to each of the parties. Morrison & Foerster gave the Republicans $22,050 and the Democrats $376,339. Here are the donations to the
Republicans. Really there is no surprise who they decided to make donations to.
They also gave the Democratic Party $111,079 and the Republican Party $2560.
Welcome to corporatism and fascism at its finest.
10 posted on
04/05/2012 12:57:01 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I think it is a tautology that any law that SCOTUS overturns was, at one point, passed by both houses of congress. If it was never passed, the Court would never have to review it..
11 posted on
04/05/2012 1:20:51 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(I like Obamacare because Granny signed the will and I need the cash)
To: Free ThinkerNY
FTA, concerning the case in the Fifth...
Kaersvang: Marbury v. Madison is the law, your honor, but it would not make sense in this circumstance to strike down this statute, because theres no
Smith: I would like to have from you by noon on Thursday
a letter stating what is the position of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice
I don't think the judge acted 100% on what Obama said. I think he was pi$$ed at what the DoJ person, Kaersvang, said.
17 posted on
04/05/2012 5:46:50 PM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(The only flaw is that America doesn't recognize Cyber's omniscience. -- sergeantdave)
To: Free ThinkerNY
20 posted on
04/05/2012 8:35:19 PM PDT by
garjog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson