Replies

Here's some flotsam for your jetsome.

Back in '52 the GOP had a candidate who was undocumented until the October before the election, despite having just won the biggest war in the history of the world.

Of course, even if he'd remained undocumented until the following January, he'd still have been eligible, droolers notwithstanding.

But it's nevertheless quaint and charming that they felt the need to document him anyway. Actually, the effort was more of a publicity stunt by Lonnie Roberts, who wanted to highlight that Eisenhower had been born in Denison. (But the birfers of the day claimed it was a conspiracy to hide the fact General Eisenhower was Jewish, LOL).

Wow. Must've hit a nerve. Where to begin?

"Here's some flotsam for your jetsome."

First, you lead in with a personal attack on my FR handle in the form of (albeit clumsy and irrelevant) tongue-in-cheeky ridicule. That's one.

Then, there's the quip about an "undocumented" GOP candidate in the '52 election despite having just won the biggest war in the history of the world. Are you attempting to conflate the proven life story and patriotic, even heroic exploits of Eisenhower with the bs life narrative of the fraud currently in the WH? Community Organizer cum War Hero? That's two.

Then there's the news article image you posted. I saw you post something similar on another thread and thought to myself, "Is this the new angle, the 'Delayed Birth Certificate'?" Nice try, but from the earlier image's story: "No doubt had ever been raised that Eisenhower was eligible. . ." Can even close be said of "Obama"? That's three.

". . . droolers notwithstanding." Pure Alinsky. That's four.

"(But the birfers of the day claimed it was a conspiracy to hide the fact General Eisenhower was Jewish, LOL)."

Managed to insert "birfer" slur, (nut job) conspiracy, and racial innuendo into one sentence. Impressive. And no, I'm not LOL-ing. That's five.

That's quite a volley of feces you've thrown up there in one post. I will not personally request that ozone be brought down on you, but if my observations here, coupled with the past experiences (of at least some of the ) others who I am pinging here are of merit, I would hope that this goes to the mods, and we are in an ibtz zone, here.

Regards.

To any I pinged who are unappreciative of my unsolicited ping, I tender my regrets.

Wow—getting a little nasty there, Cynwoody. Let me see...that language, that tone, those words...they ring a bell. Where have I see all that before, in exactly the same vein?

Thinking.

Got it. That is ***exactly*** the way they talk at fogbow. Identical in every word, phrase and nuance.

But that’s surely just a coincidence. Just like your FR crusade against birfer “falsehoods”. All just silly coincidences.

Listen, Cynwoody, you revealed your true colors on the other thread—the one about Obama’s draft registration card. It’s got a glaring error—one that indicates w an astronomically high probability that it was forged after the fact.

However, you, Cynwoody, said there is only one “reasonable” explanation. Poor, honest, victimized Obama was, yes, victimized once again. This time by a “broken” date stamp. There is zero evidence to support that theory, and yet you said that anybody who disagreed (w you) was “unreasonable”. Your way—the pro-Obama (i.e.: the Obama-defense/Obama-exoneration-of-all-wrongdoing, or even suspicion of wrongdoing) way—or the highway. You couldn’t be any more in the tank (for Obama) if you signed your name, ‘yours truly, Foggy Himself’.

Let me give you an exact—exact in every single detail—analogy. You’ve got this guy who steals. Kleptomaniac doesn’t begin to describe him: he steals beyond anything the average kleptomaniac could dream of. When he walks out the door of his house, he steals. Wherever he goes, he steals. If his hands are moving, he’s stealing. It’s what he does; it’s who he is.

So an expensive watch turns up in this guy’s house. Everybody assumes he stole it. Everybody except you, that is. You say he came by it honestly, and if anybody disagrees they are “unreasonable”. Your proof: you offer none.

Obama lies and deceives. That’s what he does; it’s who he is. Everything about him is a lie and a deception. When he opens his mouth to speak, lies come out. If a person were to record every known lie and deception he has uttered or perpetrated, a 500 p book would not hold them all.

Yet when one of the forms he puts out shows signs of forgery—i.e.: deception—you not only jump to Obama’s defense, you impugn those who dare to point out the obvious. The obvious being, the man and his life are lies. Clear, in-your-face, demonstrable lies.

Who on earth does that, Cynwoody? I’m serious. Who jumps to the defense of the most pathological liar ever to strut the American political stage? Who weaves a sob-story-fantasy about this upright, straight-arrow fellow who was (against all odds) victimized by a mythologically “broken” date stamp?

Who????????

One more thing about the uber-kleptomaniac w the expensive watch. Yes, he has a receipt, but it’s clearly been tampered with. It’s not in the form the store in which he claims the watch was bought typically prints. In fact, it appears that he or one of his friends forged a receipt so he could claim the watch was honestly purchased.

You, however, say w certitude-not-supported-by-one-shred-of-evidence that the cash register computer is to blame. It just happened to be sufficiently broken that day to print an anomalous receipt. You actually claim that, and evidently do it w a straight face.

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you look? You’ve got the world’s foremost kleptomaniac holding a valuable watched w an obviously forged receipt, and yet you weave a fantasy about the cash register computer just going a little bonkers that day.

There’s Obama Kool Aid, and then there’s spiked Obama Kool Aid...if you get my drift.

The American people are not stupid. The natural born citizenship of past presidents, (or grandfathered eligibility) has been self evident with the exception of Arthur.

Re: Dwight Eishenhower

A small army of neighbors, friends, and relatives ( along with Eisenhower's brother) stood ready to testify that:

**They knew the parents of Ike Eisenhower.

**They visited the new baby and mom and brought meals and gifts on the day little Ike was born or very soon afterward. They could testify of the pregnancy.

**There are likely church records still existing that prove his christening, and many witnesses still living could testify that they attended.

If Obama had evidence of this sort, his eligibility would never be in question. He doesn't have witnesses that can testify of his origins.

So! ....Here is a refutation of your post and I managed to do it without calling you a drooler, afterbirfer, or stating that your post is jetsome, as you did with Flotsam_Jetsome. Alinsky tactics are like the wack a mole game at a carnival. Do you seriously think you can get away with these tactics here on Free Republic? Really?

Just for kicks. The first President born in a hospital - and probably the first with pristine birth records - was....Jimmy Carter.

Before Jimmy Carter NO president had been born in a hospital. So bring up birth records for presidents before Carter is little nebulous. Besides Ike was not raised a foreign tranny, mentored by a child-molesting communist and politically backed by a domestic terrorist.

http://www.infoplease.com/askeds/first-president-born-hospital.html

Of course we knew the answer was not Barack Obama since no hospital has yet claimed to be his birth place!

But it's nevertheless quaint and charming that they felt the need to document him anyway. Actually, the effort was more of a publicity stunt by Lonnie Roberts, who wanted to highlight that Eisenhower had been born in Denison. (But the birfers of the day claimed it was a conspiracy to hide the fact General Eisenhower was Jewish, LOL).

Trying to follow this deflection. How would showing a birth certificate from Denison, Texas, disprove that Eisenhower was Jewish. His family was only there for a short time having lived in Abilene, Kan., before and after he was born. Abilene has virtually no Jewish people.

My father was born in 1912 and never had a Birth Certificate until it was needed for some government work or something. He had to go through basically the same process as Ike. His aunt had to give all the information and certify it was true. There were lots of people back then who were born at home and Birth Certificates weren’t issued.