Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/15/2012 11:00:18 AM PDT by timlot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: timlot

Good luck.


51 posted on 03/15/2012 11:33:10 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

Grumpy Puritan frowning at the sight of "merriment".

62 posted on 03/15/2012 11:38:43 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

Good. I support this 100%. Hard core porn has nothing to do with free speech and everything to do with destroying families, encouraging the objectification of women, and creating addle-brained serfs.


63 posted on 03/15/2012 11:38:54 AM PDT by Antoninus (Goal #1: Defeat Romney. Goal #2: Defeat Obama. If we don't achieve both goals, 2012 is a loss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
Hey ayatollah rick, we want government out of our lives, out of our pockets and out of our pants.
73 posted on 03/15/2012 11:45:22 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
And simple minded Americans still believe in this moral cop? He will not get the nomination but will give it to Romney. And what is Romney? Who in the freaking world knows.
81 posted on 03/15/2012 11:51:51 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

yet again the left/MSM/left wing propaganda will use every tactic to scare people or make it look like Santorum is trying to just use social issues when he is talking about other issues much more.

For the record I’m for Newt or hopefully Sarah and Col Allen West comes in and saves the day but this is pathetic by the left MSM to paint him as a social issue nutter.

He has never said he would do this so why will some freepers now jump on this if it is a done deal


93 posted on 03/15/2012 11:56:37 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman,It's not a conservative view but a true American view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

Judging by the responses of the Santorum supporters on this thread I have discovered that the nation is ~$16 trillion in debt and on the verge of socialism because grown men look at obscene material in the sanctity of their own homes.


99 posted on 03/15/2012 12:00:40 PM PDT by douginthearmy (Obamagebra: 1 job + 1 hope + 1 change = 0 jobs + 0 hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

And people wonder why conservative women aren’t opposed to this guy?


108 posted on 03/15/2012 12:04:27 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
Dear Senator Santorum,

It's the economy, stupid.

Sincerely,

Magellan

126 posted on 03/15/2012 12:17:51 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
What a Joke!

Stopping porn will be just as effective as stopping drug sales and use.

Santorum is sealing is fate making ridiculous claims such as this.

128 posted on 03/15/2012 12:19:09 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

Maybe porn regulation made sense when it was a theater here and there and magazines but internet porn? That cat is so out of the bag it’s never coming back.

Really, this guy is a TERRIBLE general election candidate. I held my nose and voted for Romney in Michigan and I don’t feel like I should have held my nose anymore.


131 posted on 03/15/2012 12:21:30 PM PDT by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
"To black out foreign sites, Santorum would likely need legislative action requiring Internet service providers to use “a mandatory filter set up by the government or by the service providers"

If I had ANY inclination whatsoever to support Mullah Santorum before, this was certainly the last straw. Yeah, let's have the government block access to sites it doesn't like! That always works out SO well! They'll promise you they'll only block kiddie porn, and next thing you know, they pull the plug on Free Republic.

A Santorum presidency would be as big a threat to our constitutional liberties as a second Obama term. Gingrich and Paul are obviously the only two candidates left that are possible to support at this point, but I'm hoping (as I'm sure many others are) that come convention time, we can get someone else entirely.
133 posted on 03/15/2012 12:23:50 PM PDT by Wyoming Cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
This thread needs some related humor...


139 posted on 03/15/2012 12:36:53 PM PDT by trailhkr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

Can we get a candidate that just wants to stop abusing he Commerce Clause? Just once?


144 posted on 03/15/2012 12:42:07 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
Internet pornography could conceivably become a thing of the past if Rick Santorum is elected president.

This is why Obama would beat Santorum. The MSM will paint Santorum as some kind of religious nutcase.

165 posted on 03/15/2012 1:05:15 PM PDT by McGruff (Newt Gingrich, the closest thing we've got to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
I am willing to bet this is Agitprop by the left. Cause if it isn't Santorum is the dumbest guy ever to run for POTUS even when considering AL Gore Ran for POTUS.
181 posted on 03/15/2012 1:21:18 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot; All

Santorum augments his Church Lady cred.


182 posted on 03/15/2012 1:22:05 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot; RitaOK; Gator113; PSYCHO-FREEP; Marguerite
Santorum's Facebook

America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography. A wealth of research is now available demonstrating that pornography causes profound brain changes in both children and adults, resulting in widespread negative consequences. Addiction to pornography is now common for adults and even for some children. The average age of first exposure to hard-core, Internet pornography is now 11. Pornography is toxic to marriages and relationships. It contributes to misogyny and violence against women. It is a contributing factor to prostitution and sex trafficking.

Every family must now be concerned about the harm from pornography. As a parent, I am concerned about the widespread distribution of illegal obscene pornography and its profound effects on our culture.

For many decades, the American public has actively petitioned the United States Congress for laws prohibiting distribution of hard-core adult pornography.

Congress has responded. Current federal “obscenity” laws prohibit distribution of hardcore (obscene) pornography on the Internet, on cable/satellite TV, on hotel/motel TV, in retail shops and through the mail or by common carrier. Rick Santorum believes that federal obscenity laws should be vigorously enforced. “If elected President, I will appoint an Attorney General who will do so.”

The Obama Administration has turned a blind eye to those who wish to preserve our culture from the scourge of pornography and has refused to enforce obscenity laws. While the Obama Department of Justice seems to favor pornographers over children and families, that will change under a Santorum Administration.

I proudly support the efforts of the War on Illegal Pornography Coalition that has tirelessly fought to get federal obscenity laws enforced. That coalition is composed of 120 national, state, and local groups, including Morality in Media, Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, American Family Association, Cornerstone Family Council of New Hampshire, Pennsylvania Family Institute, Concerned Women for America, The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, and a host of other groups. Together we will prevail.

Looks to me like Santorum needs the James Dobson voters to continue to support him in droves.

Another diversion for the media from the truly pressing issues. WTG, Santorum.

GO NEWT!


186 posted on 03/15/2012 1:24:42 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot
This retarded dimwit would prosecute individuals for "receiving porn".

Technically you could classify Playboy as porn. Hell, 1/2 the shows on Showtime on Saturday could also be technically so classified.

187 posted on 03/15/2012 1:25:39 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timlot

He cant win when they accuse him of this. If he denies it they say he supports porn. If he says its true he becomes enemy number one to the Libertarians.


188 posted on 03/15/2012 1:25:54 PM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson