Posted on 03/08/2012 10:55:25 AM PST by techno
What you have done is taken Mitt Romney completely out of the equation. In theory that is possible; In reality, not a chance!
Obama will eat him alive and make him the central focus of the campaign. He will have a billion dollars to neutralize the effectiveness of Romney’s general election campaign.
Voters vote for flawed human beings and not for perfectly groomed generic Republicans.
Most of Romney vote is by women probably because of his hair..
He has nothing else.... really.. platitudes a smile.. and a DO..
Must be most republican women are dumber than dirt..
OH! and the Mormons..... who follow an angel called “MORON-I”..
Reasons Romney will lose to Obama:
Unable to draw meaningful distinctions on both economic and social issues.
Romney is winning the primaries in areas he will lose to Obama in the fall. He will be unable to carry the more conservative areas because conservatives do not like his positions or him personally. They don’t trust him either.
Flip flops. He’s taken every side of every issue.
He’s not connecting with large segments of people. Issues + trust.
But this asset is cancelled out by his stinky lame tax plan
As the article rightly stresses, a Romney nomination is a sure defeat anyway, so why not launch a conservative third-party candidacy? In addition to sending a no-sh*t message to the GOP estabs we've had enough of their game, fielding a conservative candidacy may draw out enough conservative voters to generate interest in pulling the Senate from the clutches of the dems. Romney poisoned the waters of what started out as a promising campaign. Make the SOB pay by drawing votes from him.
I agree with the poster who stated only: B.S.
ANY Republican can beat Barrack Obama.
Every one I talk to around me cares about one thing...economy/jobs. May be I am moving in the wrong circles, but no one cares about contraception etc. May be the reason the flip-flopper has won more delegates because he may be perceived as the “experienced” on economy candidate.
Although I favor Newt, I really do not care who gets the nomination. You betcha I am voting AGAINST Obama and don’t care who is his opponent.
I am supporting Newt. But like I said in my previous post, I am voting AGAINST Obama regardless of his opponent. The millions of GOP voters will decide the nominee, not me.
Romney will be the GOP nominee and the next president.
Obama will not lose to Romney, he will lose to the economy.
It is all about the economy and nothing else. The only way Obama could possibly win is if those on welfare and food stamps and getting green subsidies vote in greater numbers than those on unemployment, paying high gas bills, and worrying about getting laid off.
It’s the economy, Stupid. All of the vapid points in the article are wrong. Obama loses to the economy and is gone. Romney is president. Bank on it.
Four years ago today, McCain was ahead by a whooping 30 points, but today, Romney is only ahead by around 10.
Getting rid of Romney is doable, but time is short.
“Dare I say it? Romney/Santorum? I wonder if that ticket would have a chance.”
Extra parsley is not going to sell that steaming green cow pie to me as steak. All you have done there is to ruin the parsley.
Bishop Willard is a leper and will blight all that he touches.
“Most of Romney vote is by women probably because of his hair..”
Wealth plus the suit. That is all it takes for many.
Time for the GOP to die anyway, destroyers of the Republic going back to 1861 and useless in the fight against the communists, the country club blue bloods and their creepy pulled back wives living it up in DC off the backs of the working stiff need to get knocked down hard.
Let the commies own the collapse and pick up the pieces in 2016.
GOP is part of the problem, not the solution.
Yeah, two whiny annoying douchebag megalomaniac lawyers from the northeast.
I'd rather vote for the communist.
“I believe that if Romney is at the top of the ticket, that the GOP will lose the House and 4 Senate seats (including Snowe’s and Liberman’s.)”
I agree. The GOP cadre will be OK with this though, as defeating the Tea Party conservative/libertarian resurgence is their principal objective. Just look to the House ‘leadership’ as proof.
If you’re looking to hasten a collapse so you can blame the other side, sounds to me like you’re part of the problem.
SnakeDoc
[ Wealth plus the suit. That is all it takes for many. ]
True.. many women are good at spending someones elses money..
They must think Willard will give them some of others peoples money..
I wonder how many democrats are women?..
Surely most RINOs are women..
[ If you’re looking to hasten a collapse so you can blame the other side, sounds to me like you’re part of the problem. ]
I would be willing to bet everyone posting on this thread
would be willing to vote for PeeWee Herman rather than Negrodamus..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.