[allmendream]

The question was why birthers still believe in an easily debunked by anyone with fifteen seconds and a brain “Pakistan Travel Ban” after THREE YEARS?

Attacking me isn't the answer.

I did not say even once that 0bama had a U.S. passport. I pointed out that the birther’s concocted reason for him needing an OTHER THAN U.S. passport is an easily debunked LIE.

Now why do birthers, three years after the fact, still go around believing easily debunked LIES!?!?!!?

Because rabid birther attack dogs are scicked on anyone who dares to mention the truth?

Because birthers are stupid?

Because they are uninformed?

Because birther sources lie to them?

Because they would rather believe an easily debunked lie than be confronted with the truth?

Attacking me isn't the answer.

Apparently other than that, you don't have an answer.

Are you incurious why obvious and blatant lies are still passed around like baseball cards among birhters?

I am curious.

I find it quite curious.

Are they just stupid, or attempting to discredit the movement by pretending to be stupid?

Seeings as how the most ludicrous racist and untruthful statements of anyone purporting to be a birthers are all held sacrosanct and the wagons circled around them by birthers - I would say that birthers are particularly vulnerable to such false flag operations.

[Brown Deer]

I did not say even once that 0bama had a U.S. passport.

[El Sordo]

I was going to warn you that if you didn’t cease this Obottery of asking rational questions, I would be forced to post a derogatory picture.

But it looks like I have been beaten to the punch.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

"The question was why birthers still believe in an easily debunked by anyone with fifteen seconds and a brain “Pakistan Travel Ban” after THREE YEARS?"

That is a bs, evasive generalization. Folks who hold to that discredited theory are in the distinct minority, to the point of being vanishingly so, amongst those who actually pay close attention to this issue. Okay, so there was no travel ban (only an advisory) on travel to Pakistan in 1981. Got it.

Now, you may choose not to answer the question you've been so artfully ducking and deflecting this whole time, but I'll present it to you again, as has been done already in this thread: Do you believe that he traveled to Pakistan on a US passport, and if so, what evidence leads you to that conclusion? Just why did "Obama" stop in Indonesia on his way there, when it has been shown that his mother was not in that country at the time, his narrative in Ayers' his book to that effect not withstanding?

Since I'm a fair-minded person who prefers clear and open debate, I've even pinged a couple of your "anti-birther" buddies to weigh in. Wouldn't want to get accused of "circling the wagons, after all . . ."