Posted on 01/26/2012 11:41:26 AM PST by justlurking
I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.
How does the mainstream media spin this?
The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!
All the judge had to do was read Obozo’s web site from ‘08 on which 0 stated that he was the son of a British subject-—and thus NOT a NBC.
This judge sounds like a hardline conservative, in which case may God bless him...or some sort of Democrat trickster with something up his sleeve.
Just a fine point, but I think you mean un-"natural born" skin? My own less than perfect understanding is that a "naturalized" citizen is one who becomes a citizen through some kind of special allowance...which would apply to Obama if he is a citizen at all.
May this truly happen....how many state would follow....
With this crowd, I have learned, over and over again, that nothing is real until you see it in a court order.
Obama will judge shop and have it overturned.
>>...Unless I’m mistaken, this was to keep Obama off of the primary ballot, not the general election ballot...<<
That is my understanding too. I’m wondering if we will have to go through all this again when the general election comes around. But, since a candidate for Pres has to go through the Sec of State to get on the ballot in GA and presuming Obama’s eligibility-proof remains reasonably and prudently questionable, I do not see why the Sec of State would allow him on the ballot for the general. Perhaps he will allow him on the General ballot just to trigger the same challenges again? If he does, I hope he does it early, rather than late. Who knows what will happen? Keep your popcorn handy!
The BIGGER question to me is: Which other state(s) will go next?
Now this is a cause that I gladly contribute money to instead of the NRC or other GOP groups that constantly show up on my caller ID.
there is no democratic primary this year
Ping for later read ............................ FRegards
Thanks for the ping!
You’re welcome!
You’re welcome!
The judge is an administrative law judge and apparently he issues not a ruling in this type of case, but a "recommendation" and then, the final decision as to whether Obama's name appears on the ballot rests with the Secretary of State.
The judge does not issue any true ruling that is binding on anybody and it's the Secretary of State who is subject to the political pressure involved regardless of what the judge does recommend.
Further, the failure to appear does not automatically result in a default judgement, the judge can still rule on "the facts" as he sees them, not necessarily default to ruling in the plaintiff's favor because the defendant failed to appear.
I am suspecting this one also will be swept aside without a true ruling on the merits of the case. But I hope I'm wrong
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.