Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The greatest threat facing mankind is...
Faith, Reason and Health Blog ^ | 01/22/12 | Various

Posted on 01/22/2012 4:54:42 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM

Sunday, January 22, 2012

The greatest threat facing mankind is...

The greatest threat facing mankind is NOT anthropogenic "climate change."

Nor is it anthropogenic environmental damage.

It most certainly is not "overpopulation." Neither is it "peak oil." Nor is it food shortages.

The greatest threat facing mankind is, however, "anthropogenic."


Because the greatest threat facing mankind is the general failure of mankind to reproduce:



Fewer tells a monumental human story, largely ignored, but which promises to starkly change the human condition in the years to come. Never before have birth and fertility rates fallen so far, so fast, so low, for so long, in so many places, so surprisingly. In Fewer, Ben Wattenberg shows how and why this has occurred, and explains what it means for the future. The demographic plunge, he notes, is starkly apparent in the developed nations of Europe and Japan, which will lose about 150 million people in the next half century. Starting from higher levels, but moving with geometric speed, the demographic decline is also apparent in the less developed nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Only the United States (so far) has been exempt from the birth dearth, leaving America as more than "the sole super-power." Perhaps it should be called the global "omni-power." These stark demographic changes will affect commerce, the environment, public financing, and geo-politics. Here Wattenberg lists likely winners and losers. In Wattenberg's world of "The New Demography" readers get a look at a topic often chattered about, but rarely understood.


You’ve heard about the Death of the West. But the Muslim world is on the brink of an even greater collapse. WILL WE GO DOWN IN THE IMPLOSION? Thanks to collapsing birthrates, much of Europe is on a path of willed self-extinction. The untold story is that birthrates in Muslim nations are declining faster than anywhere else—at a rate never before documented. Europe, even in its decline, may have the resources to support an aging population, if at a terrible economic and cultural cost. But in the impoverished Islamic world, an aging population means a civilization on the brink of total collapse— something Islamic terrorists know and fear. Muslim decline poses new threats to America, challenges we cannot even understand, much less face effectively, without a wholly new kind of political analysis that explains how desperate peoples and nations behave. In How Civilizations Die, David P. Goldman—author of the celebrated “Spengler” column read by intelligence organizations worldwide—reveals how, almost unnoticed, massive shifts in global power are remaking our future.


Remarkably, most conventional wisdom about the shifting balance of world power virtually ignores one of the most fundamental components of power: population. The studies that do consider international security and demographic trends almost unanimously focus on population growth as a liability. In contrast, the distinguished contributors to this volume—security experts from the Naval War College, the American Enterprise Institute, and other think tanks—contend that demographic decline in key world powers now poses a profound challenge to global stability. The countries at greatest risk are in the developed world, where birthrates are falling and populations are aging. Many have already lost significant human capital, capital that would have helped them innovate and fuel their economy, man their armed forces, and secure a place at the table of world power. By examining the effects of diverging population trends between the United States and Europe and the effects of rapid population aging in Japan, India, and China, this book uncovers increasing tensions within the transatlantic alliance and destabilizing trends in Asian security. Thus, it argues, relative demographic decline may well make the world less, and not more, secure.


Overpopulation has long been a global concern. But between modern medicine and reduced fertility, world population may in fact be shrinking--and is almost certain to do so by the time today's children retire. The troubling implications for our economy and culture include:* The possibility of a fundamentalist revival due to the decline of secular fertility* The threat to the free market as the supply of workers and consumers declines* The eventual collapse of the American health care system as inordinate expenses are incurred by an aging populationPhillip Longman's uncompromisingly sensible solutions fly in the face of traditional ideas. State intervention is necessary, he argues, to combat the effects of an aging population. We must provide incentives for young families, and we cannot close our eyes and hope for the best as an entire generation approaches retirement age.The Empty Cradle changes the terms of one of the most important environmental, economic, and social debates of our day.


The world's population is still growing, thanks to rising longevity. But fertility rates - the average number of children born per woman - are falling nearly everywhere. More and more adults are deciding to have fewer and fewer children. Worldwide, reports the UN, there are 6 million fewer babies and young children today than there were in 1990. By 2015, according to one calculation, there will be 83 million fewer. By 2025, 127 million fewer. By 2050, the world's supply of the youngest children may have plunged by a quarter of a billion, and will amount to less than 5 percent of the human family. The reasons for this birth dearth are many. Among them: As the number of women in the workforce has soared, many have delayed marriage and childbearing, or decided against them altogether. The Sexual Revolution, by making sex readily available without marriage, removed what for many men had been a powerful motive to marry. Skyrocketing rates of divorce have made women less likely to have as many children as in generations past. Years of indoctrination about the perils of "overpopulation" have led many couples to embrace childlessness as a virtue. Result: a dramatic and inexorable aging of society. In the years ahead, the ranks of the elderly are going to swell to unprecedented levels, while the number of young people continues to dwindle. The working-age population will shrink, first in relation to the population of retirees, then in absolute terms. A world without children will be a poorer world - grayer, lonelier, less creative, less confident. Children are a great blessing, but it may take their disappearance for the world to remember why.



Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family (DVD/ Documentary) by Rick Stout

Product Overview One of the most ominous events of modern history is quietly unfolding. Social scientists and economists agree - we are headed toward a demographic winter which threatens to have catastrophic social and economic consequences. The effects will be severe and long lasting and are already becoming manifest in much of Europe.

A groundbreaking film, Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family, reveals in chilling soberness how societies with diminished family influence are now grimly seen as being in social and economic jeopardy.

Demographic Winter draws upon experts from all around the world - demographers, economists, sociologists, psychologists, civic and religious leaders, parliamentarians and diplomats. Together, they reveal the dangers facing society and the world’s economies, dangers far more imminent than global warming and at least as severe. These experts will discuss how:


The “population bomb” not only did not have the predicted consequences, but almost all of the developed countries of the world are now experiencing fertility rates far below replacement levels. Birthrates have fallen so low that even immigration cannot replace declining populations, and this migration is sapping strength from developing countries, the fertility rates for many of which are now falling at a faster pace than did those of the developed countries.

The economies of the world will continue to contract as the “human capital” spoken of by Nobel Prize winning economist Gary Becker, diminishes. The engines of commerce will be strained as the workers of today fail to replace themselves and are burdened by the responsibility to support an aging population.

Government programs will slow-bleed by the decrease in tax dollars received from an ever shrinking work force. The skyrocketing ratio of the old retirees to the young workers will render current-day social security systems completely unable to support the aging population.

Our attempts to modernize through social engineering policies and programs have left children growing up in broken homes, with absentee parents and little exposure to extended family, disconnected from the generations, and these children are experiencing severe psychological, sociological and economic consequences. The intact family’s immeasurable role in the development and prosperity of human societies is crumbling.

The influence of social and economic problems on ever shrinking, increasingly disconnected generations will compound and accelerate the deterioration. Our children and our children’s children will bear the economic and social burden of regenerating the “human capital” that accounts for 80% of wealth in the economy, and they will be ill-equipped to do so.

Is there a “tipping point”, after which the accelerating consequences will make recovery impossible without complete social and economic collapse? Even the experts can’t tell us how far we can go down this road, oblivious to the outcomes, until we reach a point where sliding into the void becomes unpreventable.


Only if the political incorrectness of talking about the natural family within policy circles is overcome will solutions begin to be found. These solutions will necessarily result in policy changes, changes that will support and promote the natural, intact family.

Just as it took the cumulative involvement of activist organizations, policy makers, the business world and the media to create the unintended consequences we are beginning to experience, so it will take the holistic contribution of all of these entities, together with civic and religious organizations, to change the hearts and minds of all of society to bring about a reversal.

It may be too late to avoid some very severe consequences, but with effort we may be able to preclude calamity. Demographic Winter lays out a forthright province of discussion. The warning voices in this film need to be heard before a silent, portentous fall turns into a long, hard winter.



Demography is destiny. But not always in the way we imagine, begins Pearce (When the Rivers Run Dry) in his fascinating analysis of how global population trends have shaped, and been shaped by, political and cultural shifts. He starts with Robert Malthus, whose concept of overpopulation—explicitly of the uneducated and poor classes—and depleted resources influenced two centuries of population and environmental theory, from early eugenicists (including Margaret Sanger) to the British colonial administrators presiding over India and Ireland. Pearce examines the roots of the incipient crash in global population in decades of mass sterilizations and such government interventions as Mao's one child program. Many nations are breeding at less then replacement numbers (including not only the well-publicized crises in Western Europe and Japan, but also Iran, Australia, South Africa, and possibly soon China and India). Highly readable and marked by first-class reportage, Pearce's book also highlights those at the helm of these vastly influential decisions—the families themselves, from working-class English families of the industrial revolution to the young women currently working in the factories of Bangladesh.


What is the impact of demographics on the prospective production of military power and the causes of war? This monograph analyzes this issue by projecting working-age populations through 2050; assessing the influence of demographics on manpower, national income and expenditures, and human capital; and examining how changes in these factors may affect the ability of states to carry out military missions. It also looks at some implications of these changes for other aspects of international security. The authors find that the United States, alone of all the large affluent nations, will continue to see (modest) increases in its working-age population thanks to replacement-level fertility rates and a likely return to vigorous levels of immigration. Meanwhile, the working-age populations of Europe and Japan are slated to fall by as much as 10 to 15 percent by 2030 and as much as 30 to 40 percent by 2050. The United States will thus account for a larger percentage of the population of its Atlantic and Pacific alliances; in other words, the capacity of traditional alliances to multiply U.S. demographic power is likely to decline, perhaps sharply, through 2050. India's working-age population is likely to overtake China's by 2030. The United States, which has 4.7 percent of the world's working-age population, will still have 4.3 percent by 2050, and the current share of global gross domestic product accounted for by the U.S. economy is likely to stay quite high.

And the primary means by which mankind has stopped reproducing are abortifacient hormonal contraceptives and abortion itself.

Martin Luther called the "Sin of Onan" marital sodomy. In the Judeo-Christian and Natural Law tradition, any sex act made deliberately infecund is no better than sodomy.


So in considering the greatest threats facing mankind, one must also consider this:

In Depth Analysis

Crying to Heaven for Vengeance


RSS Facebook

by Dr. Jeff Mirus, September 7, 2004

From Our Store: Misinterpreting Catholicism (eBook)

The Bible mentions only four sins which cry out to God for vengeance. Considering the source and the emphasis, we have little choice but to examine our consciences on these points. A cursory examination will not do; we must cast off our cultural preconceptions to see beyond the obvious.

Homicide
And the Lord said, “What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me from the ground.” (Gn 4:10) It is hardly suprising that Cain’s murder of Abel provides the first instance of one of these sins that cries out for Divine vengeance. While all sins disrupt the natural order in some way, those enumerated as crying out to God appear to be chosen because they strike at nature’s root.


It is easy to see how murder fits into this category. The unjust termination of the life of another is a profound violation of “how things should be” precisely because our very nature compels us to regard our own lives as precious. To take a person's life is to terminate in another what we instinctively regard as our own highest good.


Sadly, the ease with which we understand the foulness of murder may be conditioned more by our culture than by Divine Revelation. We must take care that we do not find it abhorrent only insofar as we are creatures of society, rather than creatures of God.

Abortion is a case in point.
Sodomy


Then the Lord said, “Because the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is great and their sin is very grave, I will go down to see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry which has come to me.” (Gn 18:20-21) The inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah were guilty of homosexual activity. So far gone were they in this vice that the men of the town would not even accept heterosexual license with Lot’s daughters, both virgins, as a means of sating their lust (see 19:8-9).


Here we have another case in point for cultural conditioning. It is far more difficult for our contraceptive culture to see how contrary to nature homosexuality is. Those of us who instinctively feel its deep unnaturalness rightly react to homosexual activity with disgust, but logical arguments are unlikely to produce the same reaction in those whose instincts are damaged, blunted or rationalized away.

It is precisely in such situations that Divine Revelation is so very useful, for we cannot trust our feelings when they run counter to reality. We require a better guide. Sodomy strikes at the root of human nature because of its perversion of the procreative impulse, without which the race must die. But in case we don’t see it, God does.

Oppression of Widows and Orphans

“You shall not afflict any widow or orphan. If you do afflict them, and they cry out to me, I will surely hear their cry.” (Ex 21-23) There is a deep truth in this passage about the relationships of husbands to wives, and of parents to children, and about how vulnerable wives and children become when their natural protection is removed.


Very probably all of us can see that it would be gravely sinful to take advantage of the weakness and vulnerability of either a widow or an orphan, and we can readily imagine the financial burdens and solicitation of “favors” with which either can be afflicted. It is much easier in every way to abuse a boy or girl who has no father and to intimidate a woman who has no husband.

Once again, however, we must remove our social blinders to see the great evil in our culture which turns so many into widows and orphans in the first place. The grave sin of divorce, by which natural protection is ripped away from women and children, surely tops the list of horrors under this heading.

Cheating Laborers of Their Due


“You shall not oppress a hired servant who is poor and needy, whether he is one of your brethren or one of the sojourners who are in your land within your towns; you shall give him his hire on the day he earns it, before the sun goes down (for he is poor, and sets his heart upon it); lest he cry against you to the Lord, and it be a sin in you.” (Dt 24:14-15) Here we come to a principle of sound social order: those in positions of authority and wealth have serious obligations to those who depend on their decisions for their well-being. Fortunately, we live in a very wealthy society.

But does our very wealth cause this sin to appear irrelevant? Free enterprise is an excellent system, but too often it carries the completely unnecessary baggage of a callous attitude toward employees, regarding them as commodities. The social teachings of the Church have attempted to address this concern (without pointing at all toward socialism) for over a century.

Yet the latest trend, at least in the United States, is constant mergers and buyouts which throw hundreds of thousands out of work while enriching an elite few. Even temporary unemployment is both a bank-breaker and a heart-breaker. Working under an abusive or negligent boss can be a living nightmare. And most of us are well-shielded from adults who must work for a minimal wage. The Israelites were urged to remember their days in Egypt, and treat others accordingly.

Together and In Order

All of these sins cry out to God, but the four are not equal. The sequence in the text suggests a hierarchy of value, and it is a tightly linked hierarchy. One sin leads to another, from the gravest to the least, as we make objects out of persons and treat them accordingly, subverting all our natural relationships. For this reason, we cannot assuage our consciences by attending to the fourth sin while ignoring the first, or by claiming virtue on the third and closing our eyes to the second. If these sins cry out to God for vengeance and we still commit them or do nothing to restrict them in others, we mock God to His face. Of course, when we’re wearing our usual cultural blinders, it often appears to us that we can mock God with impunity. But isn’t this something else we know from Revelation—in case we cannot see it for ourselves?

The Obama administration would do well to recall these foundational principles before trying to force the only Church in the world still fighting for the future of humanity, and against this greatest threat to it, to cave in and pay for contraception and abortifacients:


Obama administration is taking a wrong-headed line with the church

Forcing contraception insurance coverage goes too far

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Sunday, January 22 2012, 4:10 AM

Archbishop Timothy Dolan has lambasted the Obama administration for putting health care policy ahead of deeply held moral teachings.

Louis Lanzano/AP

Archbishop Timothy Dolan has lambasted the Obama administration for putting health policy ahead of moral teachings.

Excerpt:


President Obama’s health chief decreed Friday that the Catholic Church must provide its employees with health insurance coverage for contraception, its moral stance against birth control be damned.

Wrong, wrong, high-handedly, obtusely wrong.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius took Obamacare’s philosophy of equal insurance for all to a level of zealotry that reduced a deeply held matter of conscience to a bothersome trifle.

Presumably, the President was fully briefed on a decision of this magnitude. If so, he made a fundamental error that will only add to a sense among many faith-based communities that the White House has a thing against religion.

It was less than two weeks ago that the Supreme Court unanimously and thunderingly scolded the administration for trying to tell churches and church-based organization that the government knew best as to who they could hire and fire.

Because of the church’s size and reach, Sebelius’ ruling will apply most broadly to Catholic organizations, but they apply to affiliates of other religions that bar contraception and sterilization.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: carryingcapacity; genocide; moralabsolutes; overpopulation; populationbomb; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-171 next last
To: wintertime

My wife teaches school in a public school, because she couldn’t find a job at a private one in our area.

She wears a cross every day, and has invited kids to go to church. Got some flack for her stand on gays also.

Is she evil?


61 posted on 01/22/2012 7:58:47 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
My parents had 3 children, my wife's parents had 4 children. Total children produced out of seven is six out of both families. Of those six grandchildren only 3 or 4 look likely to have any children. So I can see the decline in our families.
62 posted on 01/22/2012 8:05:35 PM PST by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Biblical illiteracy.

Sooner or later, everyone faces Jesus.


63 posted on 01/22/2012 8:11:21 PM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
God choice.

Typo? Makes sense either way ;-)

64 posted on 01/22/2012 8:11:59 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

The greatest threat facing mankind is mankind itself.


65 posted on 01/22/2012 8:21:45 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
I can only speak for myself. There are few things that I will not do. I would **literally** starve to death in the streets before doing it:

1) Work in an abortion center. I am sure there are many opportunities to share the Gospel in an abortuary, and even invite workers and clients to church, but I would not work in one.

2) I would not work for a school whose worldview is godless. Merely to cooperate in the classroom, read the godless textbooks, and finish home assignments, the child must think and reason godlessly. Personally, I would **starve** to death before forcing that on any child, or cooperating with it.

66 posted on 01/22/2012 8:29:12 PM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Atheism and collectivism.

The two faces of evil.


67 posted on 01/22/2012 10:08:22 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Definitely islam.


68 posted on 01/22/2012 10:13:49 PM PST by Let's Roll (Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Pro-Life bump


69 posted on 01/22/2012 10:14:57 PM PST by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

On an up note, I went to a born again Church for a Christmas service and the whole place was teeming with babies and children of all ages. What’s more there were countless pregnant women there. It was so refreshing to see and hear all those beautiful children. They truly were being fruitful and multiplying and they all seemed so happy!


70 posted on 01/22/2012 11:47:04 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Sound’s like God’s plan playing out. He told us that we would become rare as a species before the end times.


71 posted on 01/23/2012 3:45:35 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
1. Congratulations! Our next generation of achievers is now more secure.

2. Now you may discontinue the oysters...or not: I'm the oldest of ten kids. How's that for an objective?

72 posted on 01/23/2012 7:23:40 AM PST by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Never liked or ate oysters. However after the fifth child I got a vasectomy. Ten is a good number. Give your parents my compliments.


73 posted on 01/23/2012 7:50:14 AM PST by rfreedom4u (Forced diversity causes dissent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; St_Thomas_Aquinas

First of all, my original reply to you was a little snarky. I apologize. But I stand by the content and trust that we can respectfully disagree as brothers (or sisters?) in Christ.

However, nothing in what I wrote could be construed to suggest that I think Christians should work in abortion clinics. Although if a Christian did believe themselves to be called by God to go to work in an abortion clinic, there might be some legitimacy to it. Much the same way that Joseph wound up running Egypt. Or Daniel became the king’s advisor and governor of Babylon.

I know way too many Christians who teach in public schools out of vocation. It is absurd to suggest that following their calling entails either a conscious effort on their part (or even a tacit assent) to destroy the eternal souls of children. Even the suggestion of that is disturbing.

Not everyone can afford a private, Christian education— and that, in itself, is no guarantee of avoiding liberal indoctrination. And despite what many home-schoolers argue, not everyone can (or should) homeschool. There will always be a significant percentage of children in public schools. Do we simply abandon those children to “losing their eternal souls?” Or do we celebrate the fact that there are those who, having been called to be salt and light in the world, have chosen to willingly enter the lion’s den for the sake of the testimony of Christ and for the sake of those children.

If the Lord has told you to cease being friends with public school teachers, by all means follow him. Just be certain it is the Lord you are listening to and not merely the tenets of some ideology. And be very careful about suggesting that your behavior should be normative.


74 posted on 01/23/2012 7:55:15 AM PST by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
Among my siblings and me, we were somewhat unproductive: a total of 22 kids resulted so we didn't mirror our parents' committment to making more of us "Pennslyvania Dutch" sorts. Only 3 of those 22 were boys, so we didn't achieve a replacement rate from that perspective.

In my case, prostate cancer and its surgery ended my race for a dynasty but I am very happy with the children I have.

Can't help but feel sorry for those lost souls who decided to never have kids - missed out on the best part of life.

Just kidding about the oysters - last time I had 'em I got gastroenteritis and got really sick.

75 posted on 01/23/2012 8:05:22 AM PST by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: newheart; St_Thomas_Aquinas
Personally, I consider it evil to willingly agree to teach children to think and reason godlessly. It is even more evil when the children are in the classroom by government compulsion.

The statistics from the Barna foundation show that the faith of very few children manage to survive this constant godless indoctrination. Of children from highly active evangelical homes, only 15% remain active in their faith 2 years after graduation. It can only be far worse from less active or less committed Christian families.

So?...**I** am the person who made the comparison to working in an abortion center. Little baby bodies are aborted in these centers, but in government schools it is the faith of children that is aborted. Which is worse? Hm? At least the pre-born fly directly to the arms of a loving God. Those who lose their faith risk serious temporal and even eternal suffering.

As for your Christian friends who believe they are “called” to work in schools dedicated to godlessness?...well?....I suggest that they take the Barna foundation facts to the Lord, pray about it, and see if there some other way to reach these children, co-workers, and parents.

One of the problems with Christians teaching in the godless schools is that they may beguile parents. Gee! If the minister's wife or sweet Mrs. Honey Bun works in the local godless school, hey! it can't be **that** bad! ( But it is **that** bad!)

Ok...So let's address the issue of what would happen to children if all Christians and conservatives left the government schools tomorrow, and voted to have them all shut down by Friday? Seriously, what would happen?

Answer: There would be chaos for about 2 weeks. By the end of the month, churches, and local community groups would have responded. Within 6 months millions would be pouring into private voucher foundations so that every child would have access to a private education. Dame schools and one room schools would form in homes of trusted neighbors. The local Kinder Care would open elementary schools. The Karate studio would start a school as well as the local children's theater. The parks and recreation departments would take over team sports, orchestra, band, and cheerleading.

If you think that children would be abandoned if Christians and conservatives left the government schools and voted to close them then you have little faith not only in your fellow Americans but also God.

76 posted on 01/23/2012 9:08:49 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Answer: There would be chaos for about 2 weeks. By the end of the month, churches, and local community groups would have responded. Within 6 months millions would be pouring into private voucher foundations so that every child would have access to a private education. Dame schools and one room schools would form in homes of trusted neighbors. The local Kinder Care would open elementary schools. The Karate studio would start a school as well as the local children's theater. The parks and recreation departments would take over team sports, orchestra, band, and cheerleading.

Interesting call for chaos as a means to foment change. I believe your assessment of the time it would take for things to improve is overly optimistic. Maybe not for the comfortable suburbs (though I am skeptical even there), but for many in the inner cities chaos is a polite euphemism for the end result. Somalia might be a better description.

As I said before, we can respectfully disagree. So with all due respect, I will keep my school teacher friends whom you consider so evil.

77 posted on 01/23/2012 9:41:01 AM PST by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: newheart
I will keep my school teacher friends whom you consider so evil.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Evil is only **one** option. I have also said that they are either too stupid, to much of a Useful Idiot, or too devoted to their paycheck rather than their Christian principles.

Not all of them are evil, many have very good intentions, but we know were that road leads.

78 posted on 01/23/2012 10:17:50 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: newheart
but for many in the inner cities chaos is a polite euphemism for the end result. Somalia might be a better description.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Godless government and socialist-entitlement schooling is the root cause of this moral degeneracy. Advocating its continuation isn't the solution.

But...Just so we can be clear, I do NOT want the complete and sudden shut down of the government schools. We should work toward complete separation of school and state by gradually building the infrastructure needed. Vouchers, tax credits, charters. on-line education, qualifying exams, taking the GED ( or private exam) at any age, and supporting the growth of homeschooling should all lead to **one** goal: Complete separation of school and state on every level.

79 posted on 01/23/2012 10:29:11 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

So I guess there really isn’t a lot of latitude here.

They are evil.
Or they are stupid.
Or they are useful idiots.
Or they are devoted to their paycheck above Christian principles.
Or they merely have good intentions and are going to Hell.

Or they can agree with you, quit their jobs and abandon their call.

This demonstrates precisely what I mean by allowing “Christian principles” to become an ideology. Any ideology gives its adherents a set of laws by which they can condemn those who disagree with them.

Ideology is an easy road to follow. It is the way of the pharisee. And it, too, is paved with good intentions.


80 posted on 01/23/2012 10:35:59 AM PST by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson