Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I've never understood how anyone could believe that a computer or sports reporters could determine which are the two best college football teams. I guess sports reporters have their heads in the sand, or wherever, just like political reporters. The sports polls have always favored certain schools like Alabama and Oklahoma even when they have had off years. It they have a loss they will may still be rated above undefeated teams.

I think most people are so tired of bowl games by now that they don't really care about a real or phony national championship game.

1 posted on 01/09/2012 1:51:01 PM PST by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kathsua

I have never been a fan of the BCS system, preferring a playoff.

On the other hand, number 1 is playing number 2. That is about as close as one could get to a national championship game.


2 posted on 01/09/2012 1:53:00 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

The whole system is a contrivance made to create an impression that the last bowl game is a genuine championship. We get it. . .its college. . .we are happy to go along with the fantasy so as to better enjoy the game. . .its just a game after all.


3 posted on 01/09/2012 1:59:20 PM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
This is just sour grapes by someone who doesn't want to believe that LSU is #1 and Bama is #2, which they very clearly are.

Not a fan of BCS, but it's the best solution we've got unless you want to extend the college season into February with a bracket of 16.
4 posted on 01/09/2012 2:00:52 PM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Well there is the SEC.

And then there is .... ummmm... everyone else who is NOT the SEC.

So. Even if there were Conference play-offs - it wouldn’t be any better than Alabama vs. LSU.


5 posted on 01/09/2012 2:02:18 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

The SEC will be the big loser in the game because it will lose its undefeated record in the game regardless of which team wins. Alabama and LSU are both undefeated in the so-called championship game. One of them will lose that status.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That is about the lamest most pathetic comment I’ve read in a long time.


6 posted on 01/09/2012 2:04:02 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

The problem with this analysis is that Alabama and LSU are easily the two best teams, by any measure. So, having a team other than Alabama in the game would also not be a legitimate national championship game under the current system, which is supposed to pit the two best teams.

The irony of this is a number of years ago, the SEC pushed hard for a 4 school playoff system; where the top 4 teams would play it out for the championship (because an undefeated Auburn had been locked out of the championship game). No other conference would even consider the SEC proposal.

What makes it doubly ironic is the SEC has won every national championship since they made the proposal for a 4 team playoff system.


7 posted on 01/09/2012 2:05:01 PM PST by Brookhaven (Mitt Romney has been consistent since he changed his mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
The SEC will be the big loser in the game because it will lose its undefeated record in the game regardless of which team wins. Alabama and LSU are both undefeated in the so-called championship game. One of them will lose that status.

Lol, talk about about scraping the bottom of the barrel to find something negative to say. Maybe the SEC will be able to recover from being the "big loser" after winning six straight BCS championship and the shame of having SEC teams in both spots in this year's championship game.

8 posted on 01/09/2012 2:05:13 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
I hate the BCS...and there's plenty to be critical of...especially, but certainly not only, 11-1 #6 Boise not being invited to the Sugar Bowl while 11-2 #11 Va Tech was invited. But the Championship game this year is what it should be.

That said I wish someone would drive a stake through the heart of the BCS and come up with a workable tournament!

9 posted on 01/09/2012 2:05:32 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

The BSC is nothing but corrupt fantasy FB.

They need to take the top 8 conference champions and find the real champion.

Go Ducks


10 posted on 01/09/2012 2:05:44 PM PST by bray (Ride Santorum back to Sanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

If Bama beats LSU tonight, then what? Since LSU already beat Bama, each could claim the BCS Championship, since each would only have one loss - to each other.


12 posted on 01/09/2012 2:07:24 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Who do you think should be playing for the national championship?


13 posted on 01/09/2012 2:07:46 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
No BCS National Championship Game This Year

Call it the BCS Global Championship Game?

14 posted on 01/09/2012 2:08:08 PM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Roll Tide


21 posted on 01/09/2012 2:15:58 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
There are currently about 120 Division I teams. They should be split into four super-conferences. Each super-conference should be further split into four divisions.

At the end of the regular season each super-conference should have the leaders of each of the divisions compete in a four team playoff to determine the super-conference champion.

After that the super-conference champions can have a four team playoff to determine the national champion.

Bowl games can be played around the same time as the super-conference and national playoffs among the teams with better records and/or higher popularity.

The team that wins the national championship could play as many as four more games as the worst teams that don't get into any playoffs or bowl games.

Because of this there may be some profit sharing recommended within super-conferences, or throughout the NCAA.

What do you think?

27 posted on 01/09/2012 2:19:13 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Look! It's Spam!!!


Click The Spam And Donate

Donate Anyway

37 posted on 01/09/2012 2:29:45 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
It's easy to see why the BCS pitted #1 LSU against #2 Alabama for the BCS National Championship game. It's the only way they could ensure that an SEC team would lose the National Championship game! LOL!

Heck, even our 3rd place SEC West division Arkansas Razorbacks won the Cotton Bowl and finished the season 11-2 and could likely end up in the top 5 at season's end.

45 posted on 01/09/2012 2:52:49 PM PST by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

I love all these drones mindlessly claiming that LSU and Ala are obviously the number 1 and number 2. Says who? I guess that the Steelers should go on to play the Pats rather than the Broncos, and the Canucks should be given the Stanley Cup by virtue of their regular season, since they finished with 14 points more than Boston. Oh, and forget about those pretenders VCU and Butler. Duke should have been crowned the champ last year.


48 posted on 01/09/2012 3:25:02 PM PST by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Let me guess: You are a fan of a team from another conference.....?


65 posted on 01/09/2012 6:07:24 PM PST by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Six quarters, still no touchdowns.


69 posted on 01/09/2012 7:17:29 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

What a huge pile of horse crap! I’ve watched high schools raises money with “cow pasture bingo” that were of more significance than this game. Where was the LSU that beat Oregon at the beginning of the season? My end-season Ducks would have gone through either one of the jokes that were at the top of the BCS and ended with 100 points. When will the idiots that call themselves administrators and athletic directors realize that the BCS is a sham?


82 posted on 01/10/2012 7:38:37 AM PST by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson