Posted on 01/04/2012 6:33:27 PM PST by Red Steel
Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara
Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.
The case is listed as follows;
Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpress.com
HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara
Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.
(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).
Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:
From: hdohinfo
To: Nellie
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: UIPA Request - non-certified abbreviated BC for Tomiyo
SunaharaAloha Ms. (redacted):We have no records responsive to your request. Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Office staff
Send mail to:State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section/UIPA Request
Honolulu, HI 97801
hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov
Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form
“It is my considered opinion that “Barack Obama” sprung from a family-run political activist network which, since the 1960s, has been diligently “organizing” to achieve their socialist vision of America. A network spearheaded by “Uncle Fred” Newman, the primary purpose of which was to “organize” the overthrow of America’s socio-politico-economic system - that is, to shift the American model from one of democracy and capitalism to marxist socialism.” Martha Trowbridge author of The Terrible Truth.
http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/obama-rui-running-under-the-influence-of-uncle-fred/
AMen
How are you proposing that the sequential number stamps were used? Show us how Hawaii numbered their BC’s in 1961. Randomly?
what? it supports the theory that it is a fraud
That is the single most poignant sentence in your post.
Most people will not understand it, who have not worked in the government or know people who work there.
I have worked for the government and this is their entire reason for being at work- to see how they can pad their time, get overtime, additional sick days accrued, comp time accrused, vacation days accrued, and the last 3 years they 'work' as many possible hours as they can so that their retirement income is maximized (it is based on their last 3 years salary average).
People who work in the private sector have to do ACTUAL work every day, and can not imagine sitting around trying to manipulate a rule system so that their boss has to pay them more.
This just does not happen, anywhere except in the government.
So true! It is both pitiful of them and to be scorned by all.
I have no idea how the numbers were used. I do know that when three birth certificates conflict with your theory of how the numbers are assigned, then maybe it's time to revise your theory.
These birthers are going to find fault with any number that doesn't support their theory that it must be the same as Obama's.
“I have worked for the government and this is their entire reason for being at work- to see how they can pad their time, get overtime, additional sick days accrued, comp time accrused, vacation days accrued, and the last 3 years they ‘work’ as many possible hours as they can so that their retirement income is maximized (it is based on their last 3 years salary average).”
Get your facts straight.
Sick leave accrued is set in law (0-100yrs= 4 hours per payperiod). There are no “additional” sick days.
Annual leave accrued is set in law (0-3 yrs= 4 hours per payperiod, 3-15yrs= 6 hours per payperiod, 15+ yrs= 8 hours per payperiod). There are no “additional annual days accrued.
Sick leave, annual leave, comp time and maximum hours possible has NOTHING to do with 3 year salary average.
Comp time and overtime are directed by management... management says you work overtime/comptime: you must work. Management says you don’t work overtime/comp time, you don’t work overtime or comp time.
The 3 year salary average is of “base” pay...(look at a chart,determine yearly salary by grade and step for 3 consecutive years. Add up yearly salaries and divide by 3.)
Maybe you worked for another government... but the US government works this way.
This is quite a presentation. Correct me if I’m wrong but is the scenario presented putting Obama’s white mother as a Jo Ann Newman,who is related somehow to a Fred Newman who was a communist but she in some way was transformed into Stanley Ann Dunham the daughter of the communist Dunhams. WOW if so. It could also connect a few dots concerning the Axelrod communist family in Chicago and even to some dots in Moscow.
I’ve shown on my blog that two out of those three BC#’s are from forgeries, and the other is a computer printout from the HDOH that has already been caught altering records for Obama’s sake.
So do you revise YOUR theory based on the forensic evidence?
As to the lengthy blog by Pen Johanson and Dean Crosby also linked to in #135, it appears to be speculation only regarding the purported BC "regional" BC numbering system used by the HDOH in 1961. Their main argument, that "regional" BC numbering was introduced so that out-of-hospital births would be adequately represented in an even-number reporting system, is fallacious. There would be a 50% chance that any specific birth would receive an even number regardless of whether a "regional" or "chronological" BC numbering system were used. Furthermore, indications from Ms. Okubo (mouthpiece for the Hawaii DOH) are that BC numbers were, with few exceptions, issued sequentially via a single Bates stamp apparatus in the order they were received and filed in the main DOH office, regardless of geographic considerations.
U.K.L. LEE WAS THE LOCAL REGISTRAR WHO SIGNED THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR BABY COATS AND WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON CERT. NUMBER 10641.
Baby COATS was born at the WAHIAWA GENEREAL HOSPITAL - as was VIRGINIA according to her brother, DUNCAN.
Hawaii Department of Health Registrar Identified! (U.K.L.Lee is Verna K.L.Lee)
The Post & Email ^ | July 20, 2011 | WTPOTUS
Posted on Thursday, 21 July 2011 4:14:57 AM by SatinDoll
“An EXTRAORDINARY crack researcher/commenter at WTPOTUS who has solved the riddle and discovered the identity of the registrar who allegedly signed Barack Hussein Obama II’s “long-form birth certificate.””
“The reveal:”
“An entry in the 1961/62 Polk directory reads:”
“LEE Verna K L Mrs. clk State Dept of Health r1228 a 16th av”
“There you have it, boys and girls. Mrs. Verna K. L. Lee, and NOT Mr. Ukulele!”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2751301/posts
Let's keep it simple; what that analysis indicates is that the incoming certificates were processed in BATCHES (in the order they were received)...not according to TIME of birth.
Does anyone know when the Coats physical ‘certified copy’ of the LFBC was actually printed?
The real ‘certified copies’ that are printed since 2000 or so seem to be flat images. Not like the twins. Theirs were printed or copied in the 1960s. It looks like a photograph of a bound book page.
The later LFBCs are flat images, not a scan or photo of a document in bound book with the clear bend on the left side. I have 3 or 4 LFBC images that I consider authentic - most have the named blanked out.
Any new real ‘certified copy’ should be a flat image. Hawaii likely (like most states) went to a digital document library years ago. They likely scanned in the LFBCs images. From the looks of it they used 1-bit encoding since that is all they would need.
It is very odd that the Obama LFBC looks like a certified copy from the 1960s and not one from the 2000s - like Coats and others.
Just a thought for tonight.
Well said sir. A stark reminder of the truth.
And winter is coming. Who will survive the storms I wonder. I have to hope it is us...
No, sorry, I have no idea...
No, sorry, I have no idea...but here they are, for comparison...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.