Posted on 12/17/2011 9:58:17 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Gutfeld: So, um, do you feel that you have settled that question about the origins of, ah, ah, President Obama's birth certificate?
Trump: Well, yeah, look, look, very simple, and you know I was on Barbara Walters yesterday she asked the question. Unfortunately, she cut the hell out of my answer and left like the last three words and people don't know what it, what it meant. Although I was honored to be on, but, you know, she cut that in, but she asked the same thing. Look, his mother, to the best of everybodies knowledge, was never in that hospital. OK. The document may have been tampered with according to many, many people. OK. You've got grandmothers and you have people in his family who say he wasn't born in this country. OK. Forgetting all of that, do I think he was born here? I have no Idea. I personally cannot say one way or the other. You know that the mother, there are no records. There are no records that the mother was ever in the hospital. With all of that being said, folks, I'd rather focus on the economy and jobs and how to get the country back. But, ah, If you ask me was he born (here?) I really can't tell you.
.
0bama Senior is the father of BHO II; however, he is not the father of the substitute who currently occupies the 0val 0ffice.
Maybe she thought she was married to him.
A bit of information for Washington State, at least at this time. I am not sure how Hawaii works, but here you go to the County Clerks office and apply for a Marriage License. You are given the License, then you can have ANYONE you want perform a ceremony or not. If those papers ARE NOT SENT back in to the County Clerk regardless of having been signed and filled out by you/spouse/whoever did the ceremony you will not ever be registered as married.
SAD has custody of BHOII as a nanny because something happened to Anna. SAD knew Obama Sr as Anna’s BF. The baby in the bassinet is not BHO Sr’s, it’s his GF’s baby of another daddy. Stanley Dunham and Anna and BHO Sr all know each other. Sr leaves for school and something happens to Anna or she had taken off to go back home to the Philippines perhaps leaving BHOII behind with the Dunhams or with SAD.
The first pictures of Zero with SAD are when he about 3. Which could have been in 1961. SAD needs “legal” custody so she files for divorce stating that Zero is his and BHO Sr’s baby. No one contest this “fact” so divorce is granted.
The 8/04/61 birth date could be in or around the time SAD became nanny and the grandmother was able to find a dead baby to assume the new identity of BHOII. This could have become necessary when BHOII needed to show a BC to attend school. Remember he was 10 years old for approx three years...
...the discussion about an adoption predated the 'birthdate' of zero by several months. That possible adoption through the Salvation Army relates to the son of the kenyan and Ann/Anna. That adoption was not carried out.
...and after the kenyan graduated, he took his son to Kenya with him. Ruth followed some weeks later. They married Christmas Eve 1964, we are told.
And that's why you see the family group with the two boys whose ages are some three years apart.
Interesting, so one could list any number of children as being the offspring of the parties to the divorce, and as long as the party being sued for divorce did not object, custody of unidentified children would be granted?
I’m telling you it’s a real damn close copy. But yes, I can see it being the same child.
That is correct. If the person being sued for divorce does not respond it goes into default and the person asking for the divorce gets what they want.
That’s Ruth who followed the kenyan to Kenya in late 1964, she met him in Boston sometime around July 1964, she married him apparently on Christmas Eve 1964, and you are telling me she’s holding zero...as a baby?
You can’t be serious...
I understand that...but I am NOT talking about real estate or possessions, I AM REFERING TO CHILD/CHILDREN. Without any identification, what a perfect situation that presents for a child-smuggler for example...just add a name and a birthdate to the divorce petition, there's no objection, and bingo, you have custody of any number of children you choose to name on the petition. There's something seriously wrong with that.
Bingo...
The most tell tale sign of ‘authentic’ Obama II pictures is the mole on the left side of his nose. It shows up in even in the posed baby picture. The second good indicator is the ears. They are pinched in 2/3rd down and a somewhat ‘flat’ spot with a small ‘point’ near the top. Again - the solo infant picture has these characteristics.
With low resolution photos anything is possible. And the Blue photo with the mother is very low resolution. If the photos are of decent quality and size and have not been PSed the mole should show up - at any age.
The 'blue photo' shows Ruth with her child Mark, who was born after Ruth travelled to Kenya in late 1964, and married the kenyan on Christmas Eve, 1964. How she could be shown holding zero who was several years older, is more than I can imagine, give or take a mole.
Ruth and the Kenyan didn't meet until after the kenyan had been at Harvard for two years.
interesting study of different photos of Obambi
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/obama-mystery-theater-his-ever-morphing-face/
lol...one white arm, one black arm...no one knows when he was born or when he died, the dates vary depending on the website, and why would he have a thick black line around his neck...in a studio photograph? Who-ever he is, he looks kinda polynesian.
That picture shows up on the Barack H Obama foundation site.
founded by Abon’go Malik Obama
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2821875/posts?page=162#162
I posted the link and various dates/information here
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
