Skip to comments.
Poll Asks: Is Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy Dangerous To America?
The Right Elective Decisions ^
| 12/15/11
| Chris Davis
Posted on 12/15/2011 5:36:46 PM PST by writer33
With all the fawning over Ron Paul and his fiscal policy, it isn’t just fiscal policy that makes an effective President of the United States. It also takes sound foreign policy. So, we want to know what you think of Ron Paul’s worldview and how that worldview may affect the role of the United States of America in the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at therightelectivedecisions.wordpress.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: adolphpaul; chrisdavis; writer33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
12/15/2011 5:37:00 PM PST
by
writer33
To: 50cal Smokepole; Allegra; AZ .44 MAG; b4its2late; Blood of Tyrants; bluerose; Clint N. Suhks; ...
2
posted on
12/15/2011 5:38:56 PM PST
by
writer33
(Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
To: writer33
Ron Paul is dangerous. Period. But then, he does invoke a period of humor when he’s called on.
3
posted on
12/15/2011 5:40:44 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
("If You Want To Learn To Love Better, You Should Start With A Friend Who You Hate")
To: SkyDancer
4
posted on
12/15/2011 5:42:53 PM PST
by
writer33
(Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
To: writer33
5
posted on
12/15/2011 5:47:38 PM PST
by
svcw
(God's Grace - thank you!)
To: writer33
There was a time when we were warned against foreign entanglements.
In that light Paul might have a reasonable leg to stand on. From the aspect of energy security it holds up pretty darn well.
If we endeavor to restore a truly independent nation...then foreign matters should as much as they do not affect domestic matters...should remain foreign.
We need not beholden to oil and euro or other entanglements.
6
posted on
12/15/2011 5:47:48 PM PST
by
EBH
(God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
To: svcw
Ron Paul is dangerous to Bureaucrats, Crony Capitalists, and Corrupt Pols.
7
posted on
12/15/2011 5:49:33 PM PST
by
vooch
To: writer33
His huggy-kissey-face policy on Iran does nothing for me...
8
posted on
12/15/2011 5:50:56 PM PST
by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Caipirabob
Agreed. Nothing for me either.
9
posted on
12/15/2011 5:53:04 PM PST
by
writer33
(Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
To: Caipirabob
Hugs and Kisses ?
Ron Paul wants the US to stand aside and give Israel a free hand to do whatever it wants vis a vie Iran.
10
posted on
12/15/2011 5:57:44 PM PST
by
vooch
To: SkyDancer; writer33
SkyDancer, you beat me to it. NO RON PAUL!
11
posted on
12/15/2011 5:59:17 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: vooch
12
posted on
12/15/2011 6:00:01 PM PST
by
svcw
(God's Grace - thank you!)
To: vooch
Ron Paul is a crony earmark parasite
13
posted on
12/15/2011 6:03:04 PM PST
by
lormand
(A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
To: writer33
Absolutely. But then, Ron Paul is dangerous to one’s sanity.
14
posted on
12/15/2011 6:03:58 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: SandRat
I’m going to lock my crazy Uncle up that lives in the basement right after Iowa. People are standing by off stage to make sure he doesn’t slip into the Iowa counryside. LOL!
15
posted on
12/15/2011 6:04:46 PM PST
by
writer33
(Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
To: vooch
"Ron Paul wants the US to stand aside and give Israel a free hand to do whatever it wants vis a vie Iran." Where is the link quoting him on that?
16
posted on
12/15/2011 6:05:14 PM PST
by
lormand
(A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
To: Sudetenland
17
posted on
12/15/2011 6:06:00 PM PST
by
writer33
(Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
To: writer33
The older I get, the more I agree that the USA shouldn’t be squandering
all its resources on being the policeman of the world. As one of the
Founders wrote, “avoid foreign entanglements.” To that extent, I agree
with Paul.
He is also the only one I am agreeing with on fiscal issues like the
destruction of the dollar by the Fed and banking system. Many of our
Founders worried about the same thing.
18
posted on
12/15/2011 6:09:45 PM PST
by
aMorePerfectUnion
(You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
To: aMorePerfectUnion; All
Funny, I don't recall our founders being isolationist.. I mean it was Jefferson who sent Marines against the Barbary Pirates overseas..
You have to realize back when this country was founded, it took months just to cross the Atlantic, now it only takes a matter of hours if not minutes.. We tried isolationism in the 30's and it failed.
19
posted on
12/15/2011 6:17:25 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(The History of Christmas: http://www.thehistoryofchristmas.com/)
To: writer33
There was a time when we were warned against foreign entanglements.
In that light Paul might have a reasonable leg to stand on.”
Yes. I believe we should work towards that goal. However, he loses me with his nutty defense positions and his total lack of reality as to just who our enemies are and how they desire to kill us. He is just dead wrong on those issues.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson