Posted on 12/13/2011 12:50:43 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Thats a good question and according to former VP Dick Cheneys contacts, Barack Obama didnt lack for options to keep the highly-classified drone from falling into the Iranian militarys hands. In an interview with CNNs Erin Burnett, Cheney wonders why Obama didnt order an air strike on the downed aircraft while he still had the chance:
(VIDEO AT LINK)
The right response to that would have been to go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it, he said on CNNs Out Front with Erin Burnett. Instead, Cheney said, he asked nicely for them to return it. They arent gonna do that. Or, theyll send it back to us in pieces after theyve gotten all the intelligence out of it they can.
Cheney, who served with former President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2009, said he was told the president had three options on his desk and he rejected all of them. The options all involved destroying the drone on the ground.
You can do that from the air, he said. And, in effect, make it impossible for them to benefit from having captured that drone.
Iran doesnt seem inclined to even return the pieces. Their defense minister has declared the drone Irans property, and says they wont return it to the US a not-unexpected answer, given the fact that we were using it to spy on them. Thanks to Obamas decision to leave the drone intact for the Iranians to seize, theres little point in denying that fact.
What will the Iranians do with it? State-run TV in Iran announced that the military plans to reverse engineer it and mass produce their own spy drones. Wired finds that unlikely, even if the Russians and Chinese pitch in to help for their own commercial purposes:
In other words, the Russian, Chinese and Iranian experts will probably try to figure out the recipe for the RQ-170′s alloys and non-metal composites, which help minimize the drones radar signature, as does its bat-like shape. And thats where reverse-engineering starts to get complicated. Someone will figure out the [materials'] composition, the Boeing engineer explains, but producing them is entirely a different matter.
For the drone vivisectionists, it only gets worse. After examining the (alleged) RQ-170′s airframe, they will likely focus on its sensors. We dont know for sure what devices the Sentinel carries, but it could include video cameras and a ground-mapping radar. The Darpa robot designer says the RQ-170′s radar if it carries one could share subsystems with the radars on the latest F-22 and F-35 stealth fighters, which might give U.S. adversaries some insight into how those planes operate, too.
But the designer isnt too worried. Even if [the radar] showed up completely intact, they may not know how to use it because they dont know how to use the software. Moreover, the software includes classified anti-tamper measures. At least, its supposed to, according to the Boeing engineer. Dumbest thing in the world if it didnt.
Well, perhaps we have nothing to worry about or perhaps the two nations with the most expertise in copying American military systems will find a way to duplicate that success with the RQ-170. If so, we have given away a significant strategic and tactical advantage, apparently because the Commander in Chief refused to pull the trigger to safeguard its secrets.
Exactly. As I said this act by itself is enough to disqualify Obama from the Presidency.
Only two possible answers:
1.) Too stupid to think of something so logical
2.) The drone was meant to be right where it is now
add this to the OBL copter....
You are presuming Zero has a backbone.
He would have run and hidden if he could. He has the same maturity as a grade school kid who sent a baseball through the neighbor’s window.
Because he wanted to give his Islamist Brothers a holiday gift.He just forgot the ribbon.
Ha! That’s funny. My brother broke a neighbor’s window with a baseball and ran around bragging to the whole neighborhood
I just hope the eventual nominee has the b***s to use this as a campaign issue against King Barry (p*** be upon him).
Don’t worry, Barry asked the Iranians to give it back. Problem solved.
I’d like to know why Cheney didn’t pop the kenyan in the nose when he had the chance?! Looked ready to.
For the same reason on his very first day in office he tried to close down Gitmo and why he wants the biggest mass murderer in US history, Khalid Sheik Mohamed, tried as a US Citizen with full Constitutional rights so he can be aquitted. Oh yes-Then assisting Libya overthrow Khaddafi so it can go 100% Islamo-Nazi and suing Arizona for enforcing it’s immigration laws, and oh yes; Immediately overturning Don’t ask don’t tell when it was found out a homoseuxal was resposible for the biggest military security breach in US history. And Cheney is asking WHY our first foreign born first Islamic President didn’t destroy the drone?
For the same reason on his very first day in office he tried to close down Gitmo and why he wants the biggest mass murderer in US history, Khalid Sheik Mohamed, tried as a US Citizen with full Constitutional rights so he can be aquitted. Oh yes-Then assisting Libya overthrow Khaddafi so it can go 100% Islamo-Nazi and suing Arizona for enforcing it’s immigration laws, and oh yes; Immediately overturning Don’t ask don’t tell when it was found out a homoseuxal was resposible for the biggest military security breach in US history. And Cheney is asking WHY our first foreign born first Islamic President didn’t destroy the drone?
The big question.
“Id like to know why Cheney didnt pop the kenyan in the nose when he had the chance?! Looked ready to.”
Yep. He hated just looking at that jug eared son of a bitch.
Why dont you all leave the undocumented Impostor alone
on this?
He was playing golf and fundraising.
Maybe he even had to work with Holder to have the
DOJ “remove” a few witnesses, here and there.
He just did...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.