Posted on 12/09/2011 10:24:21 PM PST by Just4Him
A couple of days ago Conunderground.com was the first to point out that the circumstances surrounding the “crash” of the top secret RQ170 Sentinel drone simply didn’t add up. And we were tight! The story continues to develop and it doesn’t look good!
To recap, first we were told that Iran might’ve shot it down and then the story changed to “the drone crashed on Iranian soil ”
After realizing that the Iranians were about to parade a perfectly functional drone with nary a scratch on it, the official story changed to “the drone landed because it wants to live” I kid you not that is the official story!
The flack we caught for running the story was typical of the the kind of BS spewed by Obama’s supporters but none the less I didn’t withdraw the story because the official version simply didn’t add up.
The immediate and obvious questions were these: 1) Why didn’t we try to recover the drone? 2) In lieu of a rescue effort why didn’t we bomb it into oblivion? Apparently there was third option and Onama struk that down also.
THE ANSWERS WILL SHOCK YOU – or maybe not. Fox News National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin reported that apparently the Pentagon pleaded with Barrack Hussein Obama to give the order to do just that. The Pentagon initially wanted to send a special forces team to recover the drone. Obama shot down that suggestion. Then the Pentagon offered up plan B , blow it to kingdom come. Obama refused that too and now Iran and China have a brand spanking new fully functional top secret US RQ 170 Sentinel Drone.
The Drone was not recovered or destroyed specifically per Obama’s orders
I was also thinking of false assassination attempt. The stupid so-called assassination attempt two or three weeks ago by the guy with a Mexican name, living in Idaho, connected apparently with the OWSers, and living in a hotel at the time? And they found the car right away? With the weapon in it or ditched nearby? And this all happened not too long after the recent Ulsterman interview?
This is nasty. Nasty.
Yes, I’ve seen it. It’s working. .
Sometimes I think (hope) that some groups of people (fill in the blank) have plans but are waiting until the other side “does something” that crosses a deep line.
We can only hope that powerful people on our side have something up their sleeve.
thanx
If we’re thinking stuff, I bet a lot of other people are thinking stuff.
You should treat yourself to Bracken’s books. The ending is upbeat - realistic but upbeat.
Great post, LJ! Thank you for the ping.
I’m sorry for not being able to answer earlier. We were entertaining the church choir. We had brunch and a rehearsal. When I tried to answer in the afternoon, the regular Sunday’s “Server Temporarily such and such....” started popping up.
I was wondering if somebody or some entity is practicing Conservative sites’ disruption. Are some Administration-empowered Czars training on the disruption of communications between Americans?
IOW, the Internet, Conservative airwaves and publications HAVE TO BE DISRUPTED OR CENSORED before starting the required gun confiscation to PROTECT a violent Communist revolution and a takeover.
Just repeating a thought of what the signs for things to come are.
You could start reading at comment #155. Discussion might interest you -
“You’re going to hear a lot of stories in 2013 about what Obama and the Dems and others did since 2008.”
I’m looking for a Republican president with the balls to prosecute.
Not the first, just the most obvious.
bttt
You personally, are much more likely to be arrested for treason than the won is.
Sounds a little like the Super Secret, Super Genius plans that GW was always just about to spring.
Your theory is plausible.
Drones CAN be made with relatively low technology: a remote controlled airplane with 1990s era spy cameras and transmitters.
OTOH, we just don’t know what the Iranians have captured. It is wishful plausibility.
Your theory is plausible.
Drones CAN be made with relatively low technology: a remote controlled airplane with 1990s era spy cameras and transmitters.
OTOH, we just don’t know what the Iranians have captured. It is wishful plausibility.
I agree. I have a suspicion that's probably going to catch a LOT of ridicule, but here goes...
What if the drone that landed in Iraq is a decoy? What if we actually wanted Iran, China and Russia to get their hands on it?
My evidence? No hard evidence, but a number of things that just don't add up.
1) As you stated, this type of equipment is always designed to self destruct.
2) The drone shown on TV by Iran just doesn't look right...When you compare the Iranian TV images with other shots of the same model drone, the intake grill doesn't look right, the joins between the wings and fuselage don't look right, and the gaps around the fuselage hatches are not right...not smooth and tight enough. It just doesn't look very stealthy to me.
3) Although it's possible (but unlikely) that the Iranians built a mockup in a few hours (explaining the problems I see in number 2), our side confirmed that it was an actual image of the one that landed in Iran. The drone shown on Iranian TV just looks too crude to be entirely real.
Flame away!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.