The ONLY way I would want military intervention would be to arrest all of the traitors in Washington DC (From Hussein on down) and return to a Constitutional style gubmint.
Warm up that tar and stock up on feathers.
I could say something about Grahamnesty but secret service would be knocking on my door.
Should that not be conservative Graham. Sac off
Nelson, Bill - (D - FL) (202) 224-5274
Web Form: www.billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
Rubio, Marco - (R - FL) (202) 224-3041
Web Form: www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867pcs/pdf/BILLS-112s1867pcs.pdf
I suggest looking at the bill before calling your senator. Especially page 362, paragraph (b).
Lindsey has his eye on the dreadful Tea Party, all those fired up suburbanites.
See tagline...
We need to keep close tabs on Linseed to make sure he gets his just reward when the roundups start.
This is too funny, the Senate wants to use the US military against us to stay in power and some people think they will back down with just a phone call.
Hello, earth to poster, we are way past the phone call stage on this one....just saying...
Rand Paul is huge on individual liberty.
Anwar al Awlaki was a U.S. citizen. He was also an anti-US combatant. The nature of the war on terrorism has American citizens killing Americans as did Nidal Hassan at Ft Hood.
The military SHOULD be able to take down terrorists or combat teams infiltrated into the US. How do you write a law in such a way that it gives authority to do ONLY that?
Rand Paul was not mentioned even once in that article.
Well, I read the bill and it states that this doesn’t apply to U.S. citizens and doesn’t apply to legal residents who are within the U.S.
Here’s more on it:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:s.1867:
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will basically say in law for the first time that the homeland (the US) is part of the battlefield and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial American citizen or not.
You called me what? Those are fight'n words!
The offensive section is written so loosely that the bureaucrats who implement it can do whatever the hell they want. And when it all hits the fan these weasel senators who vote for it can say - this isn’t what I thought we were voting for.
Is this so the military can legally sweep up tea party protestors?
Or, is this all about the coming economic collapse and the rioting and looting that will set fire to the nation’s concentrated Democrat parasite nests (”cities”) once the Democrat “free shit” armies start to receive less handouts from government?
Of course, I can’t see that happening. The Democrats would make sure the US military was pared down to the bone and every conceivable government function that benefits middle and upper class (especially white) taxpayers eliminated before the bums, deadbeats, and parasites who comprise the Democrat party “base” would get one dime less in handouts than they get now.
And then....
Big One — Graham & McCain messing with Posse Commitatus.