Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Palin Victory Doesn't Depend on a Date
Conservatives4Palin ^

Posted on 10/02/2011 1:17:04 PM PDT by Amerisrael

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2011 1:17:11 PM PDT by Amerisrael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
"For what difference does it now make to anyone that Romney has announced his candidacy"

How many years has mittens been running? I've lost count.

2 posted on 10/02/2011 1:21:06 PM PDT by NoGrayZone ("Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being beheaded." Andrew Klavan of PJTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
It is transparently obvious that those who insist on pinning Sarah Palin down to specific dates FEAR her. Therefor, they seek to impose on her candidacy arbitrary "rules" which, if she "violates" them, they can declare her candidacy to be invalid.

Those who exhibit the most fear so far are The Media, The Entrenched GOP Establishment, and Freepers who back a different candidate that they fear will be swept aside by a Palin entrance.

3 posted on 10/02/2011 1:26:37 PM PDT by sklar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
Those that have repeatedly attempted to nail Palin down to a date at which she must declare her candidacy or the games is over, are therefore either ignorant of the facts or purposely attempting to mislead the people.

But didn't I read the deadline for some primaries is as early as mid-October?

4 posted on 10/02/2011 1:27:06 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
"are the very same people who’ve had no problem when other candidates such as Perry has retracted his promise from the 2010 campaign not to run for the presidency."

If he "retracted" this promise, I will expect him to retract ALL his "promises".

I will NEVER vote for a RINO again. I only voted in 2008 because I voted for Sarah. I thought once her and that one she tried to drag across the finish line were in office, she'd set him straight.

But that fool messed everything up "suspending his campaign" to get back to DC to vote FOR the bailout. I believe we were ahead before that blunder......which I think he did on purpose.

I don't think mclame actually wanted to be President.

5 posted on 10/02/2011 1:30:10 PM PDT by NoGrayZone ("Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being beheaded." Andrew Klavan of PJTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
But didn't I read the deadline for some primaries is as early as mid-October?

Mittens gets Utah no matter who is in the race.

None of the early primaries awards enough delegates to matter.

6 posted on 10/02/2011 1:31:33 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

But didn’t I read the deadline for some primaries is as early as mid-October?


Some have posted Utah as Oct. 15, but that seems to be in conflict. The Utah Lt. Gov website list the date as Jan. 15, 2012. Other dates coming up shortly for ballot access are:

Oct. 28, New Hampshire
Oct. 31, Florida
Nov. 1, South Carolina

So time still exist to file for these early dates. You can miss them and still win but I don’t think you’d want to miss FL and SC. NH will probably go to a liberal anyway.


7 posted on 10/02/2011 1:34:11 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael

Ultimately, a decision will be made and we will all be privy to it.””

Maybe.

But I wouldn’t bet on it. I think inaction and silence is also a possibility.


8 posted on 10/02/2011 1:34:42 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sklar

“It is transparently obvious that those who insist on pinning Sarah Palin down to specific dates FEAR her. Therefor, they seek to impose on her candidacy arbitrary “rules” which, if she “violates” them, they can declare her candidacy to be invalid.”

What candidacy? Is she running?


9 posted on 10/02/2011 1:35:26 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
Ultimately, a decision will be made and we will all be privy to it. Those who’ve mocked and derided her for stringing along her supporters while not planning to run and seeking only publicity and attention will probably be proven wrong, and left to scramble with something somewhat comprehensible in response, while those who’ve had to deal with the scorn and endless name-calling will watch in amusement. For those who laugh last, laugh best.

I couldn't have said it better. Thanks.

10 posted on 10/02/2011 1:35:55 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
A Palin Victory Doesn't Depend on a Date

Nope. It's Palin's way or the highway.

By golly-gosh-darned - she make the rules.

There's a new boss in town and she'll decide when the trains run.

And if you miss the stop - too golly-darned bad.

It's all Palin - all the time
All the way!
It's Palinpalooza...

And on 11/06/2012, it doesn't matter who wins. Because Palin will win - even if she doesn't run. She won't even have to be sworn in. She'll be "miracled" into office.

11 posted on 10/02/2011 1:39:05 PM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

“So time still exist to file for these early dates. You can miss them and still win but I don’t think you’d want to miss FL and SC. NH will probably go to a liberal anyway.”

RFK didn’t announce until March 27th.

Palin’s advantages:

1, not running against an incumbant.
2, former VP candidate from the previous election.
3, name recognition. Most people already know her.
4, political experience.

Similar to RFK in these regards. However:

Humphrey was well ahead in delegates, even before RFK entered the race. He did manage to win in Indiana in May of that year, and in California.

Palin could wait and pass delegates by, but it gets harder the longer she waits. And then there’s the risk of a candidate solidifying the field.

Basically, I would put her ahead of everyone out there right now, but her advantages are eroding as time passes.


12 posted on 10/02/2011 1:45:30 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
By golly-gosh-darned - she make the rules.

Just like that arrogant jerk Ronald Reagan, who announced his candidacy on November 13th.

13 posted on 10/02/2011 1:49:28 PM PDT by sklar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Mitt’s been running about 6 years but it feels like forever.


14 posted on 10/02/2011 1:53:48 PM PDT by McGavin999 ("I promise to make Washington inconsequential in your lives" Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

I’ve been wondering the same thing about some of the declared candidates.


15 posted on 10/02/2011 1:56:55 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

“Because Palin will win - even if she doesn’t run. She won’t even have to be sworn in. She’ll be “miracled” into office. “

Exactly, Sarah could even win the presidency as a write-in candidate announcing as late as a week before the 2012 election.


16 posted on 10/02/2011 1:57:32 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

The big difference is that this year the Primaries are moved way way up...in fact with Florida switching their date it pushes other states into January. And you have to get on the ballot.


17 posted on 10/02/2011 1:59:35 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“Exactly, Sarah could even win the presidency as a write-in candidate announcing as late as a week before the 2012 election.”

She could even run a week after the 2012 election and still win. Maybe the electoral college will pick her. They meet sometime in December. It may be a little unconventional but this is an unconventional campaign.


18 posted on 10/02/2011 2:04:37 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I'm a heartless conservative because I love this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I do hope that’s satire/sarcasm.

Even though I am a Palin supporter, I think that’s gotta be one of the most asinine things I’ve ever read on FR.

A write-in candidate, announcing a week out of the elections? The only way that’d work is if both candidates from the Big Two (whoever they are) had proven themselves to be utterly incompetent and the American people knew it.

And THAT, sad to say, is not likely.


19 posted on 10/02/2011 2:05:37 PM PDT by hoagy62 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers”~Sarah Louise Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

I find your lack of faith disturbing.
20 posted on 10/02/2011 2:07:42 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I'm a heartless conservative because I love this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson