Posted on 09/30/2011 8:51:51 AM PDT by xzins
The most important thing to know about the "death by drone" of Anwar al-Awlaki is that this is really about citizenship and anchor babies. Anwar, America's enemy, is a US citizen by virtue of his Yemeni dad pursuing higher education in the US at the time of Anwar's birth. Anwar was born in New Mexico in April of 1971. That made him a US citizen.
It doesn't matter that he returned to Yemen and that his parents had no intention of ever becoming US citizens while they lived here. What matters is the address of the hospital in which little Anwar screamed his first breath of defiance.
The truly bizarre is yet to follow. We also trained him. He returned to the US for both undergrad and graduate degrees: civil engineering and education, respectively. Later pursuit of a PhD in human resource development at George Washington University fell short.
This "U.S. Citizen" then set about trying to destroy his so-called "home of birth."
What's more, Awlaki's kids and wife are forever tied to the US. His five children, at least some of whom had to have been born in the US before he departed in 2002, finally arrived in Yemen in 2004 with their parents. Those born in the US while he attended school are doubly US citizens since their dad was a citizen.
As one recent discussion put it: "Each of these babies becomes an anchor who retards deportation of unlawfully present parentsand who eventually will be an anchor for entire families and villages as chain migration leads to the immigration of grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins." Bloomberg BusinessWeek
The death of Anwar al-Awlaki is not at all about getting "America's enemy." It really is a discussion about "anchor baby citizenship."
Anchor babies with bombs.
Meanwhile "The Obama administration says attempts to change the U.S. constitutional amendment that grants automatic citizenship to people born in the United States are just wrong." http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dcnow/2010/08/obama-administration-slams-attacks-on-birthright-citizenship.html
No one wants to "change the 14th Amendment, Mr President. They simply want folks to acknowledge that anti-American terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki's parents weren't "subjects" of the United States. They were Yemenis. Little Anwar wasn't a subject of the US either.
On the contrary, he was a hater and an enemy.
Of course it isn’t, but your comment makes me wonder if you read the article.
it certainly shouldn’t
I am hoping for slow-roasting - extremely long and painful slow-roasting. I hope he screamed like a little girl and thrashed around helplessly as his life was fried out of him. I HOPE HE SUFFERED IMMENSELY!
As long as we have PROGRESSIVES (Marxist/Anarchists) in power,shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
we the citizens of the United States of America will eventually
become part of the World-wide CaliphateAll Americans need to seek the face of YHvH in His WORD.
I would be ok with removing the 14 or, at a minimum, rewriting it.
Yes, I know Wiki says that, but it doesn’t mean that she wasn’t a naturalized citizen. After hearing that his mother was a U.S. citizen, I wondered if his father met his mother here while he was at school.
I’d be interested if you learned more.
I’ll let you know if anything comes up. Maybe another freeper knows. My sense is that she wasn’t based on the quote I showed you, but you are correct that one of them could have become citizens while over here.
Adios, cucaracha!
Neother was this pieve of shit. He foreswore his US citizenship, when he took up arms against the USA. Not matter what the domestiv enemy ACLU plague rat traitors say, or any TINO Fla politician traitor says. It’s a damned good thing that Fla Rat traitor didn’t say that traitor trash about “killing a US citizen in front of me, cause I’d be in jail right now for beating his face in with a claw hammer.
Wow...DG...tell us how you really feel?!
The ACLU wants anchor baby laws to stay the same. They are nuts. If Awlaki doesn’t prove that’s a mistake, then nothing will.
There is also a law on the books that if you take ups arms with a foreign enemy against the USA, that you automatically forfeit and foreswear any claim to any US Citizenship.
Awlaki was *NOT* a US citizen
If you’ve got a link to that law, I’d love to see it.
It is true, though, that anchor baby law has him being a US citizen by virtue of being born in New Mexico. All the outlets are reporting him as a us citizen.
But, if that link changes that, I’m all for saying so. Thanks.
CAIR will file a lawsuit.
Good to see some trash taken out
Is CAIR US citizen too? Why are they still permitted to operate in the US?
I bet a lot of them belonging to CAIR are “Jihadists” too, as there are non-CAIR ones, sworn naturalized US citizens. Even born citizens, with mother and father US citizens.
I find the hang-up with natural born US citizenship fascinating.
Unfortunately, moslems & their “jihadist” wing, in the US, both take immense pride in being US citizens. After all, the freedom in the US has provided them with the opportunity to spread their pro-Islam message.
However, what differentiates them, often, is not much. Except that one provides the propaganda for the other; intentionally or simply out of ignorance. Same goes for their “American or Western” sympathizers & propagandists.
Hi - I simply want to know why CAIR as an “organization” is still permitted to operated inside the US?
Obviously, an “organization” is not an issue w/out *People* - that’s the issue -—> *People* — CAIR didn’t come into existence yesterday either; CAIR has been operating in the US for yrs.
Point is: Funny that many ordinary people (Americans included) should be finger printed, scanned, prodded, probed, and what not, at borders or traveling within the US.
Yet, the US allows organizations such as CAIR to legally & freely operate & disseminate their pro-Islam stuff *inside* the US! Don’t you find it inconsistent & contradictory?!
to operated = to operate
Every now and then, we get a bit of good news. Anchor away my boys...anchors away.....boom!
I wish this had been properly. IMHO, what should have happened is that Anwar should have been tried, in absentia, for treason, convicted and sentenced to death, and then the sentence carried out.
I heard on the Mark Levin show that they dropped one bomb and missed him- and that he was running away when they dropped another one on him
That made me so happy~!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I hope that they have video of the little bastard running for his life
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.