Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich to unveil new Contract with America next week
The Daily Caller ^ | 9/20/11 | C.J. Ciaramella

Posted on 09/20/2011 9:03:17 PM PDT by jageorge72

Gingrich — one of the original architects of the 1994 Contract with America — said his new “21st Century Contract with America” will be revealed on Sep. 29 and will be “very visionary” and “very big.” He called it “exactly what Abraham Lincoln would have campaigned on.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012; gingrich; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Future Useless Eater

You could throw Cain into those combos and I’d be good with them...


21 posted on 09/20/2011 10:20:36 PM PDT by moonhawk (Hobbit for Sarah...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jageorge72
Newt is an ideas man.

Even though he has no prayer of winning the nomination, having him as a candidate is a good thing. Our eventual nominee needs to run on something other than "I'm not Obama".

Newt's plan should be interesting at the very least, and should help our party frame the terms of the debate for the next election.

22 posted on 09/20/2011 10:23:04 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I am curious for their example as well. From what I remember Newt and those guys pretty much did everything that was humanly possible. Some of it was undermined in the Senate.


23 posted on 09/20/2011 10:29:53 PM PDT by dusttoyou (paulnutz/bachnutz/palinwishers are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jageorge72

Newt makes a challenge because he knows that he can Whip the O’s rear end...and he can.

So sad that his past will kill him.


24 posted on 09/20/2011 10:49:06 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jageorge72

Let him do all the damage he can to Obama but as far as voting for him when other options are available...

Newt-Nancy-Couch-Global Warming.

Nuff said.


25 posted on 09/20/2011 11:00:21 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (Chief Druid of Trollhenge: Cult of Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
However, on reflection, let him stir the pot. He won't get the nomination, so we're pretty safe there.

I had a creepy deja-vu feeling - like not that horribly long ago we were saying the same thing about the insane old-fart McCain and him having to pack the room at CPAC with his own staffers…
26 posted on 09/20/2011 11:44:56 PM PDT by GunningForTheBuddha (DC is like a car full of clowns off their meds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

Newt’s a Third Wayer no thanks


27 posted on 09/20/2011 11:57:57 PM PDT by paul revere is riding (I'm really a Paula.....Go Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

In an election for President between Obama and Newt—how many on the FR would pull the handle for Obama because they didn’t like the coach commercial Newt made with Nancy P?


28 posted on 09/21/2011 1:07:12 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

If it was a choice between Newt and Obama, which would ANY of you vote for-?!?


29 posted on 09/21/2011 1:25:32 AM PDT by imjimbo (The constitution SHOULD be our "gun permit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I believe the problem is lack of effectiveness, not that he didn’t technically meet the terms of the original CwA.

The House alone could have forced much more of it through as actual legislation, had Gingrich not capitulated at the Moment of Truth.


30 posted on 09/21/2011 1:57:40 AM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Captain Beyond

You are right. Newt played a major role in the conservative revolution and became a big target for the msm and left. He is a brilliant man...he did not stumble or stammer during the debates when the panels dared to question him. I believe they are afraid of him and he is smarter than Wolf Blitzer or Chris Wallace.


31 posted on 09/21/2011 2:33:52 AM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I like Newt. I pray I will see him debate Obama one on one. It will be an ass kicking of the century. He has his past mistakes, but he is an extremely capable and talented leader that our country sorely misses.


32 posted on 09/21/2011 2:51:21 AM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

Newt got almost all of the Contract passed through the House.

That is all the Speaker of the House can do.


33 posted on 09/21/2011 3:58:54 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jageorge72

Let him do it and cheer him on...why?
Because he may not win, but just like Bachman, Cain, and others, he forces folks to address critical items and not ignore them. If the contract has awesome stuff in it, it may force the hand of the leaders to address how THEY stand on such issues or even pick up the torch when Newt has dropped out. It’s a win for the US in my book either way.


34 posted on 09/21/2011 4:17:14 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jageorge72

I’d like to see him be the guy that asks the questions at the first “debate” (I use the term loosely here) that The Messiah participates in.


35 posted on 09/21/2011 4:24:42 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

***Newt got almost all of the Contract passed through the House. That is all the Speaker of the House can do.***

Boehner knows what you mean;)

Clinton benefited from Newt’s Contract with America and took credit for the improved economy and optimism.


36 posted on 09/21/2011 4:29:30 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair: Man's surrender. Laughter: God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Founding Father; Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears; wagglebee

I agree with you. He is smarter than any two of the other candidates. I’ll go you one better. He’s the BEST candidate out there. It would be like voting for King David AFTER the Bathsheba incident came to light.


37 posted on 09/21/2011 5:02:15 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins
Don't count him out. He is clearly the smartest candidate in the field. He may be politically tone deaf, but he is smarter than any two of the other candidates.

I have always thought that Newt is an incredible "behind-the-scenes" organizer and strategist, in this role he is one of the best ever.

The problem with Newt is that when he's in public he comes across as very abrasive and can't seem to get things done.

He was able to convince America to get behind the Contract, but when it came to specific and critical events (like the government shutdown) he lost the public's confidence.

I think Newt would make a good VP or chief of staff as long as he realized that he was their to push the president's agenda and not his own (e.g. global warming).

38 posted on 09/21/2011 5:14:09 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It would be like voting for King David AFTER the Bathsheba incident came to light.

That raises a good point. Here's another.

Matthew 6:15
15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

39 posted on 09/21/2011 7:05:40 AM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jageorge72

(facepalm)


40 posted on 09/21/2011 7:06:34 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Today, I will only post in one word answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson