Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obama Jobs Plan: 10 Reasons Why It Is A Bad Joke
The Economic Collapse ^ | 09/10/2011 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 09/10/2011 3:26:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

So that was what we have been waiting for? That was what all the hype was about? With a little over a year until the next election, that was the "best shot" that Obama has for fixing the unemployment crisis in this country? The Obama Jobs Plan (also now known as "the American Jobs Act") is going to cost $447 billion and it is going to do next to nothing to create more jobs. Many Americans were hoping for something bold and new from Obama, but instead what they got was a bad joke. When Obama stated that there is "nothing radical in this bill", he was not kidding. Instead of addressing the fundamental issues that are causing job loss, Obama wants us to spend half a trillion dollars on measures that will only create a very small number of jobs. Sadly, much of what Obama is proposing actually consists of huge bribes to middle class voters. Obama is trying to keep his own job, and he appears willing to pile up even more debt in order to make that happen.

During his speech to the nation, Obama instructed Congress to either "pass this jobs bill" or to "pass it right away" 16 different times. Obama obviously feels very strongly about his jobs plan.

But will it work? Let's take a few moments to break it down. The following are 10 reasons why the Obama jobs plan is a bad joke....

#1 The payroll tax cuts are going to cost more than anything else in the plan, but they will do very little to create jobs.

Just take a look at what is happening right now. Have the current payroll tax cuts done much? No, the unemployment rate is still over 9 percent.

Yes, the new payroll tax cuts would be deeper and they would put some more money into the pockets of American workers.

But if American workers go out and spend it on stuff made in China, how does that create more jobs for American workers?

Businesses would certainly welcome the fact that their payroll taxes would be cut, but it probably will not entice many of them to hire more people.


Because they know that the tax cut would only be temporary. After just a handful of months the payroll tax would go right back to where it was before.

Businesses are not often moved by temporary tax cuts. If you want tax cuts to really move business, then you need to make them permanent.

So does that mean that I am against these payroll tax cuts?

Absolutely not. I very much hope that payroll taxes get cut. I am all in favor of the government taking as little money from me as possible.

Look, if the federal government is going to destroy our financial system anyway, I would much rather keep as much of my own money in my own pockets as possible.

So yes, I am all in favor of payroll tax cuts.

But no, those cuts are not going to do much to create jobs. If payroll tax cuts were going to create a lot more jobs we would already see it happening.

However, if this is passed it will be a great bribe to voters because millions of Americans will see their paychecks go up and when that happens they will think of Obama.

#2 Obama's plan to extend unemployment assistance is going to cost about $49 billion but it is not going to do much to create any jobs.

Back in 2009, Congress first authorized an extension of unemployment benefits to a maximum of 99 weeks. Five times since then Congress has reauthorized this extension.

So has this made a huge difference in the number of unemployed?

Of course not. If it was going to make a huge difference it would have done so already.

Yes, these extended benefits are easing the suffering of those that are out of work, and yes they are giving them a little extra money to spend, but let's not pretend that extending unemployment benefits is going to create a whole bunch of new jobs.

#3 Obama is proposing $50 billion in "immediate" infrastructure spending and $10 billion for a new infrastructure bank that will be dedicated to raising private capital to finance infrastructure projects around the country.

Hopefully this will work out a whole lot better than the "shovel ready" jobs that Obama promised previously.

Yes, infrastructure all over this country is rapidly falling apart. Yes, it is a legitimate function of government to invest in public infrastructure.

But no, this is not going to create a ton of new jobs. It will create a few jobs, but it will also add to our rapidly growing national debt.

#4 According to the fact sheet on the jobs plan released by the Obama administration, direct financial aid to state governments will prevent up to 280,000 teacher layoffs, and it will also help states retain more police and firefighters.

Essentially, this is a "backdoor bailout" for the states. Yes, it will be a good thing if teachers, police and firefighters are able to keep their jobs. However, preventing job losses is not the same as creating new jobs. So this may help reduce the bleeding a little bit, but it is not going to turn the overall employment situation around.

#5 There are a bunch of other minor things in Obama's proposal such as "modernizing" public schools and helping more Americans refinance their mortgages, but it is not entirely clear how those things will help create a lot more jobs.

Meanwhile, there are a whole lot of things that the Obama jobs plan does not do....

#6 The Obama jobs plan does next to nothing to prevent jobs from being shipped out of the country.

As I wrote about the other day, right now the way the system is designed makes it highly profitable to send American jobs overseas....

*It is legal to pay slave labor wages in many of these other countries. After all, why pay an American worker 10 or 20 times as much as a worker on the other side of the globe?

*In many of these other countries you do not have to provide any health care for workers.

*In many of these other countries there are virtually no environmental controls to worry about.

*In many of these other countries there are virtually no labor standards to worry about.

*In many of these other countries you only have to deal with a fraction of the "red tape" that you have to deal with in the United States.

Obama is doing absolutely nothing to address these imbalances.

#7 The Obama jobs plan does nothing about the unfair trade practices that are absolutely killing America on the global economic stage.

As I wrote about the other day, other nations are manipulating currency rates, they are openly stealing technology from our companies, they allow their workers to be paid slave labor wages and they put up huge barriers to goods and services from the United States and we let them get away with it. Our trade policies are absolutely insane, and the way that the new "global economy" is structured guarantees that U.S. businesses are going to be operating at a huge disadvantage. The following are just a few more of the reasons why foreign firms have a huge advantage over U.S. companies....

*Many foreign nations deeply and directly subsidize national industries and the U.S. government lets them get away with it. That puts our industries at a vast disadvantage.

*The United States has the highest corporate tax rate in the world. That puts our corporations at a vast disadvantage.

*Many foreign nations do not require businesses to provide health care for their employees. That puts our businesses at a vast disadvantage.

*Many foreign nations impose very little regulation on businesses. That puts businesses in the United States at a vast disadvantage. In the U.S., we have some of the most restrictive regulations in the world.

In 2011 we are going to end up with a trade deficit that is probably going to be well in excess of half a trillion dollars. According to one estimate, if the trade deficit was totally eliminated it would create 8.4 million new jobs inside the United States.

So why isn't Barack Obama proposing to do something about all of this?

#8 The Obama jobs plan does nothing about the gigantic mountains of ridiculous regulations that are absolutely killing small business in this country. According to the Heritage Foundation, 75 new major regulations that have cost U.S. businesses more than 40 billion dollars have been passed since Barack Obama first took office.

The Federal Register (which contains all federal regulations) just keeps exploding in size. Last year alone, 81,405 new pages were published in the Federal Register.

Right now there is a good chance that you are breaking dozens of federal regulations without even knowing it.

All of this regulation is crushing our businesses and is making us much less competitive in the global marketplace.

Yes, there will always be a need for common sense regulations on business activity. But what we have right now is an absolute madhouse.

#9 The Obama jobs plan does nothing about the negative effects of Obamacare. Obamacare is going to absolutely slaughter U.S. businesses. Look, when most other nations do not burden their businesses with providing health care and we force our businesses to comply with the nightmare that Obamacare represents, who do you think has the advantage?

The other day, I noted some of the effects that Obamacare is already having on the U.S. business community....

According to a recent report from the National Federation of Independent Business, one out of every eight small businesses in the United States have either already had or expect to have the health insurance plans for their employees terminated by the health insurance companies because of Obamacare. Another recent survey of mid-size and large businesses found that nearly ten percent of them plan to stop offering health insurance coverage to workers once Obamacare insurance exchanges begin in 2014, and another 20 percent are not sure if they will continue to offer coverage or not. Our health care system is deeply broken and the ones that keep getting the short end of the stick are average Americans.

If Obama was serious about putting Americans back to work, he would do something about Obamacare.

But he is not going to do that, is he?

#10 The Obama jobs plan makes our national debt worse. Yes, Obama insists that his plan will be "100%" paid for, but he has not told us how it will be paid for.

Exactly where in the world is he going to get an extra half a trillion dollars next year?

Obama probably intends to propose some tax increases that he knows that the Republicans would never, ever agree to.

So, no, Obama's proposals will not be paid for.

The U.S. national debt has increased by more than 4 trillion dollars since Barack Obama took office. It is currently increasing by more than 2 million dollars per minute.

We cannot afford to pile huge amounts of additional debt on to the backs of our children and our grandchildren. What we have already done to them is deeply, deeply criminal.

In the end, some of Obama's proposals will probably get passed, none of them will be paid for, our debt will get even bigger, and the fundamental reasons for our job losses will remain unaddressed.

So hopefully you can understand why I consider the Obama jobs plan to be a really bad joke.

Tonight, millions of Americans will be sleeping in seedy motels, in their cars or in tent cities.

Just check out these pictures from New Jersey. Can you believe that some hard working Americans actually have to live like that?

We had the greatest economy that the world has ever seen.

Things did not have to turn out this way.

But they did.

Now Obama has come up with a "plan" that will not fix any of our fundamental problems but that will get us into a whole lot more debt.

Please excuse me if I am less than thrilled.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: jobs; jobsplan; obama; unemployment

1 posted on 09/10/2011 3:26:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not funny joke bump.

2 posted on 09/10/2011 3:33:21 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

A bit off topic, but I’ve come to the conclusion that libs are either ignorant/uninformed by intent or by laziness, think they are right about everything, won’t listen to facts or are completely unaware of them.

I just had a conversation with a lib about how “the rich” in NYC are leaving in droves because of high taxes and he said “BS” that’s not true. I told him to look it up - it’s fact and that less than 100,000 people are basically supporting the City via their taxes.

I also told him that California is arguably the worst state for a business, and he replied “that’s not true” I can think of a lot of worse places to do business”

I told him these are facts that he can google, to which he replied “I don’t need to - I watch the (local) news and read the (local) paper here in Marin County, just north of SF

He is 58 years old and lives off of some type of government support. His solution is to “tax the rich”

I told him you can tax “the rich” at 100% and it would not get us out of this 15 Trillion dollar hole.

As for our energy problems, I proposed we transition our cars to run on natural gas, not electricty, which isn’t free and requires coal and other energy sources to create, and that we have an abundance of NF in Alaska.

He replied “Who told you that? Sarah Palin? then he laughed”

I told him we are giving our money to our enemies in exchange for oil, which is sheer madness.

He replied “Let’s keep importing our oil from the Middle East as they will eventually run out of it, then we can tap our own oil”

Like I said, this guy is 58 years old. It was like talking to a 5th grader about world politics.

He also says “America will never go broke, as we can just print more money”

I asked him if he is aware or what is going on in Euro countries. He replied “That will never happen here”

I said “What about the Great Depression”?

He said it was caused by rich Republicans and nothing like that will ever happen again, unless the GOP gets back into power as they have caused all of our countries problems, and proceeded to dig up the grave of RWR and to blame him, a man who took over a failed Dem Presidency and turned our country around.

He replied, “That was luck as economic cycles come and go. Reagan just “got lucky” as he was with the USSR and other accomplishments.

Of course, he gets most of his food from a “food bank” (donations) and hasn’t bought food for himself in years.

I’ve noticed the cost of food has gone up dramatically over the past several months. He hasn’t because he gets most of his food for “free” which isn’t “free” it’s paid for by people like myself that work and pay taxes so he can do nothing all day. (He claims he’s “retired” but he gets a check from the state 2x a month”)

He also thinks Obama is doing a good job, despite his plunging job approval ratings. He said those are meaningless and rigged by the GOP and that Obama will easily win a second term.

I told him the Dems should have elected Hillary, who I don’t like but is far more knowledgeable and has an experienced husband to advise her on tough issues.

I also asked him how Obama is going to get re-elected when his job approval ratings are plummeting and are currently in the low 40’s. Again, he said Obama is doing a great job, but the GOP is hampering him and that the polls are rigged.

I told him “Do you think Obama is the only POTUS to have to deal with an opposing party in the House/Senate?”

Obama’s arrogance is “It’s either my way or no way” and if he doesn’t get his way, he blames the GOP

I asked him, what pre-election promises has Obama kept?

Obama promised by this time in his term he would:

1) Cut the deficit in half.
2) End the war in Iraq
3) End the war in Afghanistan
4) Close Gitmo
5) Lower unemployment & create millions of jobs.

Those were just a few of his pre-campaign promises I could remember, as I was so mad I couldn’t think straight anymore, to which he replied “It’s the fault of the GOP” - they won’t let Obama do anything.

I told him Obama had a filibuster-proof House and Senate for two years and accomplished nothing, except pushing thru a health care bill which the SCOTUS will rule unconstitutional, to which he replied “That’s because the GOP controls the SCOTUS”

I told him it’s because it’s unconstitutional, and just about any Constitutional expert will tell him the same.

I asked him “what about the 2 years he had without the GOP?”

He said they were working “behind the scenes” to make Obama look bad. I said Obama is doing a good job by himself and I asked him again about his broken campaign promises, to which he replied, “I have to leave now, I don’t have time to argue these pointless accusations”

So there you have it - a typical “debate” with a typical, SF Bay Area Democrat.

Sorry for the long, OT post, but I just had to unload.

If you’ve read all this, thanks for reading as it took a while to write and I had to get this out of my system to an understanding group of people.

3 posted on 09/10/2011 4:01:47 PM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield ("President Obama blames ________ for his inability to _____.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Obama Jobs Plan...

Jobs plan, my A$$. Should be entitled, "Obama Re-Election Plan". Trying to "buy" a second term. Won't work, dimwit!!

4 posted on 09/10/2011 4:06:51 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I think I can boil down what this article is saying in a very short, simple question to Mr. Obama:

"Mr. Obama, what is the price, taken on a national average, of a single new employee in the United States per year? Include pay, benefits, paperwork, registrations, workplace mandates, union dues processing, office equipment, parking, inspections, taxes, 'fees', everything."

"Now, show the same cost for a single new employee in other countries. China, Mexico, Japan, Indonesia, India, Africa, USSR, and even England."

Because he has never had to worry about the total cost of an employee, he might be shocked at the answers.

When I was promoted to manager in an electronics manufacturing company's R&D division, I was told that the rough rule of thumb was that, for each employee of that division, the fully-burdened cost was three times the base salary of each person. That's before payroll hold-outs like FICA.

Here's the kicker: who gets a good chunk of that money? Government. So when Obama says "pass this bill NOW" what he's saying is that he wants more green stuff from businesses.

How about this, Mr. Obama? How about unions paying their fair share to the Treasury? Instead of to the campaign coffers? Oh, another conflict of interest.

5 posted on 09/10/2011 4:11:59 PM PDT by asinclair (Talk is cheap, actions are priceless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield
I read it and thank you for being able to remember a conversation.

My sometimers will eventually digress into alltimers (Tha's a joke, Ah say, tha's a JOKE, son) and I have many of those conversations, but I CRS after.

6 posted on 09/10/2011 4:13:04 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield

I read and enjoyed your conversation as well.

Those two checks your friend gets from the state might be what they call “crazy checks” on the street.

I would check to make sure he’s taking all of his meds on time. He sounds like he might have some “issues” going on.

7 posted on 09/10/2011 4:23:22 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I may be mistaken but doesn’t the payroll tax go for things like social security and medicare? Those are the 2 things that are in financial trouble in the near future and now will be in more trouble sooner with less going in.
Another thing I noticed was when the first payroll tax cut went into effect last January, the “make work pay” tax cut from the federal income tax expired the month before in December. Obama had to scramble to cover the fact that federal income tax was going up so he cut payroll tax to offset it.

8 posted on 09/10/2011 5:17:55 PM PDT by RAV_USA (RAV_USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldenPup

He decided to call the Obama Jobs Plan “the American Jobs Plan” after he ran it by a focus group and found that that went over better than “the Kenyan Jobs Plan.”

9 posted on 09/10/2011 5:55:16 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoldenPup

RE: Jobs plan, my A$$. Should be entitled, “Obama Re-Election Plan”

Radio talk show host, Mark Levin calls it the Obama save my job plan. :)

10 posted on 09/10/2011 6:37:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

RE: So when Obama says “pass this bill NOW”

What bill? Nothing has been written down... How can you pass a bill that does not exist?

11 posted on 09/10/2011 6:39:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield

And there you have it, the typical liberal in this country. Doesn’t pay taxes, is on food stamps and/or welfare and is a complete parasite on society.

On top of that, is completely unable to process facts or logic, and is programmed from birth to spout only liberal bullcrap.

There is absolutely no reason to wonder why Nazi Pelousy continues to easily get re-elected. He perfectly represents her voter base, and there are millions just like him.

So, probably the first mistake was trying to talk to the liberal to begin with, it is a complete waste of time.

12 posted on 09/10/2011 6:49:16 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (Fight organized crime. Vote out all incumbent Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield

I am but a humble welder/ fitter. I don’t profess to be a genius. But I think I have been blessed with common sense.
My kid sister on the other hand (51yrs) is a grad from smith collage. Cumlaude. Political science major. I say to her one day a few years back,”how can you vote this way with whats on the news?
She says, in stunning shock, “I dont have time to watch the news”.
It basically ended there as I was speechless

13 posted on 09/10/2011 6:49:32 PM PDT by weldAllday (Elections have Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weldAllday

RE: My kid sister on the other hand (51yrs) is a grad from smith collage. Cumlaude. Political science major. I say to her one day a few years back,”how can you vote this way with whats on the news?
She says, in stunning shock, “I dont have time to watch the news”.


Many people go to college just to get a degree. PERIOD. After that, essentially their education just stops there. What you just shared with us is exhibit A.

14 posted on 09/10/2011 7:10:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The only way “infrastructure” decay can ever to be addressed seriously will be when we succeed in greatly reducing the size of our bohemoth federal governments and the governments of states like California . Decaying bridges etc. have been a major campaign issue since the late 60’s. It was about then that the size of central government was taking another quantum leap.

It’s the localities that know where the potholes, corroded welds, and bad sewer lines are. Leaving infrastructure spending to the Feds just means more and more vote buying pork barrel boondoggles.

15 posted on 09/10/2011 7:40:37 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I may be mistaken but doesn’t the payroll tax go for things like social security and medicare? Those are the 2 things that are in financial trouble in the near future and now will be in more trouble sooner with less going in.

I have wondered the same thing. How clever of BOTH parties to call it a "payroll tax cut". If less money is being deducted from paychecks for social security, do they have some kind of super secret Rob Peter plan to fund retirement or have they decided to go with the Soylent Green option?

16 posted on 09/10/2011 7:53:45 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson