Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann would not enter the room until the lights had been changed (What's that all about?)
Blackhawk County Republicans Event | Sunday August 14, 2011

Posted on 08/14/2011 8:52:08 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

Rep. Michele Bachmann, Governor Rick Perry and former Senator Rick Santorum met in Waterloo, Iowa this evening to speak to the Blackhawk County Republicans. Santorum spoke first then Rick Perry spoke and after that Bachmann spoke last, but before that this strange event happened:

Chuck Todd NBC: Bachmann would not enter the building until they had confirmation from staffers INSIDE that the lights had been changed. Overheard a Bachmann staffer supervising the light change say: "We're a go"

Link

Peter Hamby CNN: Lights were dimmed for Bachmann when she took the stage

Link

HotAir Ed Morrissey: Wrap-up from Waterloo: Perry embraced, Bachmann falls a little flat

The lighting had to be changed before Bachmann spoke, apparently at the campaign’s insistence, which delayed her entrance and interfered with the timing of her entrance announcement. But more puzzlingly, Bachmann didn’t arrive to mix with the crowd before the event started, waiting until she was scheduled to speak to enter the Electric Ballroom.

Link


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: catfight; iowa; michelebachmann; nonproductive; noshow; notrunning; palin; rickperry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: Bigtigermike
At least she didn't ask that all the Christian symbols be removed from the walls.

-PJ

81 posted on 08/14/2011 11:45:21 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Everyone's Irish on St. Patrick's Day, Mexican on Cinco de Mayo, and American on Election Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

It actually is much easier to speak to a crowd if you can look them in the eyes. If the stage lights are bright and aimed at the stage where you are, it seems that all you are doing is talking to bright lights. In my case those lights were very bright. I actually just said the gun bit as a joke, but was surprised to see a few people in the front row pull their jackets back. Needless to say I put a lot of effort into that presentation.


82 posted on 08/14/2011 11:59:07 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: bobk333

Michele’s rise to the top of the polls, or to whereever she is now, coincides with her hiring of Rollins. 3 months ago, she was under 5%. I don’t know enough about Rollins to criticize him, but he has taken her up in the polls. Everything that has taken her down hasn’t been Rollins doing.

Rollins is providing excellent debate prep. She won that exchange with Pawlenty, really hammering home the “Pawlenty made us choose between low tax and pro life” message, she was able to say that twice, and Pawlenty inflicted it upon himself.

She was able to mention what Pawlenty did - low tax vs pro life - an anecdotal - and Pawlenty was shown to be in the wrong vs Bachmann. She could not have explained the story if she had brought it up herself, but Pawlenty gave her such an opportunity to really get Pawlenty with that.

There are a whole lot of things about Bachmann that are pretty questionable, pretty “not presidential”, Rollins had nothing to do with Bachmann resume, except to highlight it, perhaps, which he really shouldn’t do, except maybe to manage it, manage the story.

I have a lot of trouble attacking someone who ran Reagan 84. Since then, we’ve had worse performances by everyone else.
Rollins knows how to win 49 states. Karl Rove won by one close state each time.

Rollins picking Bachmann is good on Bachmann. If he thought it was a pointless waste of time, he wouldn’t have gotten on board.

I would argue that the Bachmann campaign is doing a great job.

If the Sarah Palin campaign is run by Ed Rollins by the end of the year, I wouldn’t be surprised. If Palin gets in, the stress, rigors of campaigning, the more complete picture of Bachmann that emerges, SNL, and Bachmann will be dropping out and throwing her enthusiastic support behind Palin. Palin will get her organization, because this has been the plan from the beginning. I don’t know that for a fact or anything, but, if it was the case, it wouldn’t surprise me at all.

I vaguely remember an article back in around February that I believe had Bachmann describing this very scenario. I vaguely remember seeing something like Bachmann saying that she’d build the organization, and when Palin gets in, she’d take the organization. Make things good for Sarah in Iowa.
Well, if that was the plan, Bachmann did a great job. Handoff from Bachmann to Palin about a month.


83 posted on 08/15/2011 1:12:07 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

Obama pees sitting down.


84 posted on 08/15/2011 1:39:36 AM PDT by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Well at least she doesn’t travel with two teleprompters and an audio reverb unit.


85 posted on 08/15/2011 2:43:49 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

So what if she wants to appear at her best, I remember how they lambasted Nixon’s looks for lack of makeup during a TV debate with Kennedy.

Wife had noted before that under certain light conditions Bachmann’s facial features are quite harsh.

Will admit I have never noticed this, but guess women can pick up on such.


86 posted on 08/15/2011 3:09:23 AM PDT by Sea Parrot (The entitlement class will prove to be the liberals very own creation of a Frankenstein monster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

She was Late to the Podium after a Commercial on the Debate on FOX,after the Next segment and just before the Cut away she was Leaving the Stage again.


87 posted on 08/15/2011 4:24:53 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

I don’t get it either.


88 posted on 08/15/2011 4:29:01 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Run, Sarah, Run! Please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sea Parrot
So what if she wants to appear at her best, I remember how they lambasted Nixon’s looks for lack of makeup during a TV debate with Kennedy.

Yup. I haven't decided on who I'm supporting yet, but there's really nothing to this and Bachmann is getting a raw deal with the story.

I remember reading about the kinds of negotiations that go into planning the general election debates (they probably don't apply as much to large early-season primary debates). IIRC, in 2000 the Gore Campaign made all sorts of concessions to the Bush Campaign to have the debate venues' temperatures lowered to 65 degrees. Anything higher and Gore would have really bad flop sweats. Which wasn't the image he, his campaign, (or Naomi Wolf for that matter) wanted him to project.
89 posted on 08/15/2011 4:39:09 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Carling

Palin plant? Are you daft? This is Free Republic. There can be no Palin plants here, she is a legitimate conservative. Goodness, this site is turning positively looney.


90 posted on 08/15/2011 4:50:58 AM PDT by Marie Antoinette (Proud Clinton-hater since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: calex59

You are extremely right! The “new” swirly ones actually “pulse” light. You can’t pick up the pulsing but your brain does. I know one migraine sufferer who has purchased CASES and CASES of the old fashioned light bulbs for this same reason. If it is a trigger then you simply eliminate any trigger that you know about. IMHO, she is probably doing what her doctor has recommended and this isn’t any different to me then a person reducing their salt intake or taking a vitamin.


91 posted on 08/15/2011 5:19:06 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: handmade

OK she’s off my list

If you are serious and that one thing alone takes her off your list, that is way more than shallow on your part.

Of course I’m serious ! Can’t have anyone wanting to change the lights !!! ??? </s>


92 posted on 08/15/2011 5:23:29 AM PDT by sawmill trash (TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY !!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Perhaps her staff forgot the putty knife and makeup?


93 posted on 08/15/2011 5:39:49 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (DID I MENTION...SARAH PALIN 2012 OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

It`s unclear, but first the bulb must want to change


94 posted on 08/15/2011 5:41:50 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (DID I MENTION...SARAH PALIN 2012 OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Yes, she is susceptible to headaches, but it’s also got the added benefit of making another one of those idiotic Newsweak covers more difficult to shoot.


95 posted on 08/15/2011 5:43:09 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (You're either in or in the way. "Primary" is a VERB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

It was so obvious in her interviews on Sunday shows...you could see her makeup was on very thick/shiny.

She should be able to have her makeup put on without that shine.

I will get in trouble for this no doubt, but the question begs...who looks better in the morning, Sarah or Michele? I think we know, one is natural the other is not


96 posted on 08/15/2011 5:46:32 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (DID I MENTION...SARAH PALIN 2012 OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
You don't think the media would try to portray her in an unflattering light. Have you forgotten the Newsweak cover?
97 posted on 08/15/2011 5:47:07 AM PDT by McGruff (a Sarah Palin supporter and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

...and one is a talking points diva without accomplishments or executive experience and the other is a true Reagan conservative leader who walks the walk.


98 posted on 08/15/2011 5:51:07 AM PDT by newfreep (I am a "terrorist". I am Sarah Palin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
People running a campaign are supposed to be conscious of the makeup, lighting, camera angles, … etc.
That’s what they’re there for.
If you don’t watch it, you’ll get sabotaged by an opponent.
99 posted on 08/15/2011 5:55:48 AM PDT by threeifbydeceit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

Her makeup people are also using way too much of that white stuff around her eyes. It gives her a raccoon look. She truly needs a new team.

I really hate it when a candidate is judged on looks, and it, of course, happens more to women. Ron Paul would still be delivering babies in south Texas if he were judged by the same standards.


100 posted on 08/15/2011 6:02:35 AM PDT by Jedidah (I'll vote for an earthworm before I'll vote for Obama. So wiggle on in, Rick Perry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson