Posted on 08/06/2011 1:22:16 PM PDT by Lloyd Marcus
That was a classic PDS thread. Everyone should read it.
Huntsman = McCain.
Huntsman = Obama.
Perhaps he saw the ad: ;)
New members wanted
Hi EVERYBODY!
We’re looking for new members to join our group, the “She-Man Catti-Girls Club”! We are a VEEEEERY exclusive group that is just SOOOOOO COOOOOLLL!
Don’t you want to be just like us? We’re POPULAR! We do all sorts of fun stuff like go on internet forums we have no interest in and make snide comments, say really stupid stuff and pretty much pi$$ off everyone there just like a real clique of teenage high school girls do! Aren’t we COOOOLL!?!? You’ll see us on all the Palin threads (she’s a quitter you know... so NOT CoOl!) and making fun of her cuz she’s like sooooo IcKy and stuff. Just mail one of our ‘members’ and we’ll get back to you once we get tired of patting each other on the back over our latest really CoOl post we made! And we have like partys and get togethers and other cool stuff where we all sit around and tell each other how CoOl we all are! AwEsOmE SaUcE!!!
OMG! You probably aren’t HoT or cOOl enough to be one of us, but we’d like you to try out for the team so we can ping each other and laugh behind YOUR back too! CoOl HuH?!?!? But mostly we just drool a lot cuz we really dont have anything worth saying or listening to but like OMG! We’re SOOOOO CoOl!
K, gotta go now. That stupid Palin DorKeTtE said something that made us mad again so this time we’re REALLY gonna get her good...ToOdLes!
Him?
Good Lord!
“There exist pro-Palin elements that are devoid of reason, sensibleness, scruples and morals.”
Your post is a good example of the weakness inherent to the particular tactics you employ.
If your statement has any value and if you have any credibility, you will be able to describe how Palin supporters are “devoid of scruples and morals.”
Yea, he clammed up when Jim called him out.
“You might want to remember that ...Rollins ...DECREASED her support.”
I MIGHT want to, but that would not make such an obvious falsehood true.
I don’t doubt one bit that a small handful of small minds could possibly have made their support decisions based on some pre-announcement remarks by a guy paid, in that case, for his very public and honest opinion of Sarah’s situation from the view of an old-school campaigner.
Of course, I certainly would not admit it in public if that was the full bloom of my decision tree.
There is plenty of room this early for both fine ladies. And I don’t find many faults with either. Debates are a great way to compare folks who both look good on paper. I’m anxious for those to happen.
But I sure ain’t committing my early donations to someone who has yet to commit to me.
I love Palin, but I am admittedly biased for Bachmann partly because she lives in my hometown and I am more familiar with her great and principled voting record.
But I DEFINITELY will vote for either if they win the primary. And that’s all I expect from other level-headed Republicans.
I’m glad you’re open to SP, but as for the ‘obvious falsehood’ RE MB, you are dead wrong. Have a look around the conservative sites. MB’s hiring of Rollins cost her conservative support in spades. All those ‘former’ supporters out there left her camp in large part over her hiring RINO Rollins.
The threads here on FR alone bear that out.
Thank you, sir, for the best story I’ve read in a long time. I fervently hope it comes true.
Palin has what it takes to fight for what’s right without ‘compromising’ like so many others do. She’s the one.
We have no idea if Rollin's remarks were "honest".
What is easy to point out is that Rollins' remarks, specifically about Palin's intelligence, was classless Democrat propaganda.
I think it's a small mind that doesn't include Rollins' remark and Bachmann's silence those remarks, as a part decision making process when picking a candidate.
Yah. Clammed up when I called him out too...
BTW are the Viking Kitties a closed club or can anyone join? I wanna contribute ;)
I think it's a small mind that doesn't include Rollins' remarks and Bachmann's silence about those remarks, as a part decision their making process, when picking a candidate.
Actually Mattie hired Rooster.
Rouge = Rogue, yes?
We have a third!!!
Hell, they’d have me, so it should be obvious that anyone can join :o)
“All those ‘former’ supporters out there left her camp in large part over her hiring RINO Rollins.”
Such shallow people might very well exist, but the polls do not reflect your statement. She went from TPaw numbers to being fully clamped onto Romney’s ass in less than one month after signing Mr Ed - regardless whether it’s to his credit or not.
Again, basing one’s political support on something so small and so absolutely unrelated to ANY of the extremely serious issues facing this nation today... is childish. At best.
Are you ‘serious’ in your belief that so many are so unserious? Folks who truly backed Bachmann over Palin, then switched because of Ed’s remark?
Boy, what an insult to Sarah that would be - “ya, we like Michele better, but she hired Reagan’s old campaign guy, so we dumped her and are settling for you, Mrs. Palin.”
If Sarah herself turned out to be this petty and unserious, which I don’t at all expect, then Rollins would be hailed a prophet.
I don’t give a rip which fine conservative you choose. I just hope, for the sake of your own self-respect and for that of our seriously imperiled nation, that the basis for the choice is something more substantive than the Rollins silliness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.