[FreeReign]

I don’t doubt one bit that a small handful of small minds could possibly have made their support decisions based on some pre-announcement remarks by a guy paid, in that case, for his very public and honest opinion of Sarah’s situation from the view of an old-school campaigner.

We have no idea if Rollin's remarks were "honest".

What is easy to point out is that Rollins' remarks, specifically about Palin's intelligence, was classless Democrat propaganda.

I think it's a small mind that doesn't include Rollins' remark and Bachmann's silence those remarks, as a part decision making process when picking a candidate.

[FreeReign]

Yikes, correction:

I think it's a small mind that doesn't include Rollins' remarks and Bachmann's silence about those remarks, as a part decision their making process, when picking a candidate.

[BuddhaBrown]

“We have no idea if Rollin’s remarks were ‘honest’.”

I said ‘honest OPINION’.

And I have absolutely no reason to doubt his sincerity.

Now, if you have a device which can determine the honesty of another’s opinion, I’ll give you a million bucks right now for the patent rights.

Perhaps it would help if you gave me the EXACT and FULL quote that has you peeved.