Posted on 07/10/2011 4:39:22 PM PDT by Normandy
If there is any way to solve the huge economic problems faced by people around the world, energy solutions have to be found. We live in a time of increasing energy costs and the prospect of them going higher as they become more scarce. We see all kinds of efforts to find alternatives to the fossil and nuclear fuels we have become dependent on, but while we see incremental progress in energy innovation, no new energy technology has as yet have been comparable in abundance or efficiency to the traditional mainstays. Those mainstays are becoming more expensive and scarce as physical supplies dwindle and a variety of government regulations make them more costly.
This is what makes the appearance of Andrea Rossi’s energy catalyzer technology so significant. We are apparently approaching the introduction of an energy source that has the potential to eclipse anything we have yet seen in terms of abundance, economy and efficiency
(Excerpt) Read more at e-catworld.com ...
“....Could Be It”.
Calling Kevmo! Another e-cat article.
Oil, gas, and coal are not “scarce”. It’s just that the eco-wackos want to ban them.
Until there are units providing power in commercial applications in different systems I am not ready to believe there is not a thread turning this wheel.
All goods are scarce so long as it requires expenditure of effort or resources to acquire them.
You noticed that too!
Yep—flyswatter needed.
Report #2 - Energy Catalyzer: Scientific Communication and Ethics Issues
New Energy Times ^ | June 28 2011 | Steven Krivit
Posted on Wed 29 Jun 2011 11:25:11 PM MST by Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2741977/posts
Thanks, SatinDoll.
The Cold Fusion Ping List
Let me tell you — I like Rush (L.) but don’t always think much of his grasp of science.
But the other day when talking about passive vs. active sources of energy (having to do with the oil platform that crashed and the Japanese nuclear reactor post-earthquake problems, he distilled it down to something non-science people can understand: to make usable energy it requires explosive risk. Oil and natural gas can explode. Nuclear planners can melt down, etc. etc. etc. Solar, wind and other passive sources of energy are slow to create, slow to store and are not suited to large-scale use.
I almost NEVER use the word “paradigm” but in this case I think this is the proper positing of one. If we can change that paradigm, then we can see the world change.
And the current administration is probably too scared or too stupid to see it.
It’s good the Univ of Bologna guys are developing ECAT, because if it was developed in the USA, Omoslem would nationalize it and give it to his union Mafia cronies, just like Chrysler and GM.
Also, Omoslem LOVES us sending billions to his Saudi buddies every year for oil. So he’d crush the ECAT, which could impact oil sales and reduce islam/jihad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.