Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil
I think this woman was trying to provoke the police. How hard would it have been for her to go into her home when asked? ..... COMMENT FROM LC3127 This woman is part of an anti-police group in the city that provoke police to hopefully get them to over react. There was no over reaction here. She knew what she was doing and clearly did not listen to an order. She listened when he asked her to step back but never to go in the house...weird. Who goes outside to get fresh air with a camera in hand? Someone who is doing it on purpose to interfere with a police investigation. She has been arrested before so she knows what she's doing.
27 posted on 06/21/2011 8:11:49 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jo Nuvark

Even if she was part of an ‘anti-police’ group, she was standing on her private property, completely acting within her legal rights. There was absolutely no indication of any probable cause of a law being violated, eminent danger, and obviously no warrant.

I’m not one to bash LEOs, I think the 90% good ones are being tarnished by the 10% bad ones, however, if the video tape tells an honest tale, she was in the right.

This is similar to all other matters of rights- they are inherent. Laws are there to protect our inherent rights and limit infringement of those rights. It has become bass-ackwards.

“There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible to live without breaking laws.” - Ayn Rand


36 posted on 06/21/2011 8:20:52 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
I feel threatened by your attitude, Jo.

STOP RESISTING!

65 posted on 06/21/2011 9:00:48 PM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

She seems to have an excellent reason to be anti-police; at least with the cops in her city.


71 posted on 06/21/2011 9:08:49 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
If I am not breaking the law then I can do what ever I want when ever I want to on my own property. The cops do not have to agree or give me consent. I am the public and the cops are employed by the public. Sometimes they forget.
84 posted on 06/21/2011 9:24:30 PM PDT by oldenuff2no (Rangers lead the way...... Delta, the original European home land security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
How hard would it have been for her to go into her home when asked?

What part of this is not supposed to be a police state do you not understand? It's 100% irrelevant how easy or how hard it would have been for her to follow the JBTs illegal order. She did nothing wrong and she was on her own property. Queen of the castle, end of story.

But by all means, keep feeding the totalitarian state little by little, then wonder in amazement when the monstrous, hungry beast devours you. But it will be OK, because they will just be following orders.

89 posted on 06/21/2011 9:40:12 PM PDT by thecabal (Redeem your mind from the hockshops of authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

if it takes a few brave souls to confront tyranny, we should all be happy....


94 posted on 06/21/2011 10:24:21 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

This doesn’t change the fact that the cop was way out of line.


97 posted on 06/21/2011 11:11:02 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

She was home. The police were wrong period. If they are afraid of being taped then they must be doing something wrong. As they like to say to us what do you have to hide.


102 posted on 06/22/2011 5:12:30 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

Yes, just do as you are told, the overlords are beneficent after all.


116 posted on 06/22/2011 8:30:27 AM PDT by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

Be a good sheep, Baa Baa


117 posted on 06/22/2011 8:30:54 AM PDT by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

Nope...I saw the entire video. She was not trying to provoke him...just the opposite...He was trying to provoke her and he did...


137 posted on 06/22/2011 5:48:00 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
I think this woman was trying to provoke the police.

Wrong. She was filming a stop in case something sinister happened. You know, like a cop arresting you for being on your own lawn filming a stop. Something sinister like that.

How hard would it have been for her to go into her home when asked?

Pretty damned hard, whatwith America supposedly being free and all.

She knew what she was doing and clearly did not listen to an order.

It was an illegal order.

She listened when he asked her to step back but never to go in the house...weird.

She shouldn't have stepped back, either.

Who goes outside to get fresh air with a camera in hand?

People who are keeping cops honest.

Someone who is doing it on purpose to interfere with a police investigation.

Filming is not interfering.

148 posted on 06/23/2011 6:56:37 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson