Newt is exactly what we don’t need. A fat, overage relic with largely imaginary past glories, a womanizer, a fraternizer with the enemy, a career politician. Get lost, Newt. Go back to the Greek Islands and enjoy your jewelry.
Newt started talking before he formulated a campaign message. He’s a pro. He should have know better. He blew his chance.
And why I say NO to Newt.
Newt is a smart guy, but he has messed up too much over the past years.
He has kind of passed his chances and frittered them away.
No Newt taxes.
Contract with America was his. Point to Gingrich.
Romney sucks worse than Gingrich. Point to Gingrich.
Gingrich is not in my top 3, but Romney would be worse, Perry would be worse, Huntsman would be worse, etc.
Oh man. I think Newt wouldn’t mind a bunch of leftwing ideas if he was in charge of them. No thanks.
I think because Newt Gingrich recognizes the Democrat Party as a viable American Political entity, as opposed to the criminal international organization that it is, he is out of touch with the current reality.
We the people want, therefore must insist upon representative leadership that recognizes who our enemy is, understands what it is they are doing, the direction they are attempting to lead us, is as anxious as ourselves to defeat them, is strong of character, therefore has our confidence to cover their back, and the list goes on.
Doesn’t sound like a guy that reaches across the aisle, or sits on a couch with the enemy to me.
Forget Gingrich. He cannot instill one damned bit of confidence in myself, and most folks I know, or talk with about the dismal state of affairs we are in today.
Newt? I think I’m gonna throw up.
Hi. I appreciate that you post full-content. But might I suggest that you also stay and discuss? All four of your posts are “1 of” posts. When folks reply, they are replying to you. They might appreciate a reply back on the thread.
[The departure of Gingrich’s staffers is nothing more or less than a breath of fresh air ]
Alex, I was going to take ‘stench of death’ myself for the Daily Double.
End of statement
I don’t know how to respond to this. jspellman, was this meant as satire? Or do you actually believe Newt is a good choice?
This is your fourth post since you signed up and you wasted it on this drek?
NO NEWT. He’s a foul, untrustworthy, dishonest creep.
Please do not add keywords containing profanity.
Like all members of the order Caudata, newts are characterised by a frog-like body with four equal sized limbs and a distinct tail. Aquatic larvae have true teeth on both upper and lower jaws, and external gills.[2] They have the ability to regenerate limbs, eyes, spinal cords, hearts, intestines, and upper and lower jaws. The cells at the site of the injury have the ability to de-differentiate, reproduce rapidly, and differentiate again to create a new limb or organ. One theory is that the de-differentiated cells are related to tumour cells since chemicals which produce tumours in other animals will produce additional limbs in newts
In other words, A NEWT IS A SLIMY LIZARD WHO HIDES UNDER ROTTEN LOGS, not a reliable conservative.