 Run through! |
Adam Dangerfield, last September. He fell asleep while driving to college in Idaho. Here he is on the Today Show.
Posted on 05/20/2011 1:39:14 PM PDT by decimon
>
Thankfully, Silvestro wasn't seriously injured in the accident, though she did suffer second-degree burns to both hands. Track crews and safety personnel rushed to her assistance and put out the blaze. She had reportedly been clocked at speeds well over 200 miles per hour just prior to the accident.
>
(Excerpt) Read more at autoblog.com ...
She is extremely lucky to be alive.
Very fortunate that the car only made a glancing blow on the wall, pure luck it wasn’t a head on crash.
What difference does it make to you? There's more info at the blog than just at YouTube and I've no problem giving the blog credit for the find.
[Something came loose and she lost it into the wall. Lucky!]
Yeah, it doesn’t look like driver error, something cut loose before the slide.
Run through! |
Adam Dangerfield, last September. He fell asleep while driving to college in Idaho. Here he is on the Today Show.
looked like coolant going under the wheels to me...
Three reasons off hand. One is waste of time of an extra click though.
Second has to do with security loss of going through a web site like a blog that could record our IPs. Lots of people post here don't care to chance identities/location loss. Youtube is too big to really chance that, but a person that had a grudge could build a web blog and record IP's and narrow down which people responded and one chances being identified.
Third is the chance you are blog pimping, teaser intro that could of been reworded in a nice simple intro and a direct link to YouTube. A Google search shows that this web site blog used the very same sample as you did.
http://www.thedeltareport.com/2011/05/video-simona-de-silvestro-goes-airborne-at-indy-suffers-second-degree-burns-200-mph/
Also the same blog talks a lot about Freepers and seems to be Catholic leaning.
Just makes me wonder.
All anyone collecting IPs has to do is post a pic on FR which is served from a server they control or which keeps logs they have access to. Then anyone who opens the thread will get their IP collected when their browser fetches the image. LOL!
Same trick works for email. You put a tiny invisible image in the email. Then you get to find out the IP of each person who reads the email.
But not to worry. Turning an IP address into a name is pretty hard unless you have subpoena power over the ISP that provides the IP.
E.g., there was that twerp in 2008 who hacked into Sarah Palin's email and posted what he found. When he posted, he was careful to go through an anonymizing proxy. But unfortunately for him, the proxy (ctunnel.com) was keeping logs.
Odd the Original poster I was talking to posted a thread talking about such as you mention and it also goes through the web site I mentioned earlier (thedeltareport.com). Are you sure you are not somehow connected to them?
Trust but verify.
Also the tricks you mention fail when using several programs like Firefox ad-ons (no script, ad block, flash block) and a good antivirus program like even free AVG.
Was that Tony Renna?
Not only that but I forged Obama’s birth certificate for him. In a Catholic monastery. In the Mississippi Delta. Where FReepers are tortured to extract all their secret info.
It was you who has “What difference does it make to you”? I answered and then gave results of odd showings that articles are being pimped on more than one site using the exact same “extract”.
It was you who has “What difference does it make to you”? I answered and then gave results of odd showings that articles are being pimped on more than one site using the exact same “extract”.
Wrong. If I believed in AVG, I might run one. But I don't.
Truth is, the only way to hide your identity from the Feds is to use a proxy that doesn't keep logs (or is located where the FBI can't get the locals to enforce a subpoena) or that keeps logs but doesn't know who had what IP when. An example of the latter would be a public WiFi access point. But you still have to watch for security cams, which are getting ever more common.
No, but I agree with decimon. There is no reason to deny hits to bloggers posting interesting content.
I didn't argue against that did I, your post that was removed was one of the reasons. Don't post any of my personal information again, you have been here long enough to have known that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.