Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HR 1687 Open Fuel Standardization Act: a dangerous scheme we can do without
coachisright.com ^ | May 18, 2011 | Robert Werner, staff writer

Posted on 05/18/2011 12:10:52 PM PDT by jmaroneps37

By ACT! for America recently sent out a "Special Action Alert" requesting support for a Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19] sponsored bill, H.R. 1687 - Open Fuel Standardization Act.

The bill promises "to ensure that new vehicles enable fuel competition so as to reduce the strategic importance of oil to the United States." According to ACT! for America, the bill is "one common sense approach to energy independence!" Reading the actual bill, however, may lead you to a different conclusion.

Washington, it seems, has determined that our energy problems are because the auto manufacturers simply aren't giving us the right choices to make when we peruse their dealership lots. Rep. Shimkus, along with co-sponsors Rep. Roscoe Bartlett [R, MD-6], Rep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28], Rep. Eliot Engel [D, NY-17], Rep. Steve Israel [D, NY-2], Rep. David Loebsack [D, IA-2], and Rep. Collin Peterson [D, MN-7] sprang into action and crafted a bill that only Cass Sunstein could appreciate.

H.R. 1687 would mandate that 50% of all new cars and light duty trucks produced by 2014 be engineered to run on some type of alternative fuel.

By 2016, the percentage of new alternative fuel vehicles increases to 80%; finally topping out at 95% in 2017. Step aside, Free Market, Big Government coming through! If only “We The People” weren't so obtuse. Unwilling to do the right thing; passing over Chevy Volts in favor of Ford F-Series Pickups and Honda Accords. Shame, shame.

Unburdened by frivolous things such as actual consumer demand, the Government will save us from our folly. We'll plug millions of new electric cars into our aging and already underpowered electrical grid. It doesn't get more green than electricity after all….

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; hr1687
They are determined to take all of our freedoms!
1 posted on 05/18/2011 12:10:56 PM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The bill is subtitled: The Horse and Buggy Act


2 posted on 05/18/2011 12:13:46 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rod1

**The bill is subtitled: The Horse and Buggy Act**

then the same said WHACKOS will complain about the “HORSE HOCKEY”


3 posted on 05/18/2011 12:16:52 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (islam ... church of the Perpetually Offended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

My diesel truck runs just fine on the alternative vegi fuel, so I guess I’ve got it covered.


4 posted on 05/18/2011 12:18:42 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37; All

5 posted on 05/18/2011 12:18:54 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Don’t animal dung/flatulence contribute to Global Warming...er...uh...I mean, Climate Change? These people do not care about the chill-rens! They just hate the little chill-rens! Oh the MANATEE! /s (kinda)


6 posted on 05/18/2011 12:20:57 PM PDT by ExTxMarine (PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Ethanol doesn't damage engines badly enough. They want to find something more efficient.
7 posted on 05/18/2011 12:29:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

TARGET ACQUISITION COMPLETE: Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19]

The good citizens of Illinois have a duty to the rest of us.


8 posted on 05/18/2011 12:36:48 PM PDT by HKMk23 (A free man unarmed is just a slave on borrowed time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
They are determined to take all of our freedoms!

Even worse, we seem determined to let them.

9 posted on 05/18/2011 12:41:23 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Dimmitude, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The economic, environmental, and moral disaster of ethanol cannot seem to be stopped despite agreement from the left and right (large parts at least) that ethanol is no solution for future energy needs. If a Democrat proposed this bill, I would understand that this bill aligns with Democrat desires to nationalize energy development and usage. However, Republican sponsorship makes me believe that we have an enemy in our midst. This congressman should be run out of the party.


10 posted on 05/18/2011 12:45:48 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

how about we just outlaw the california bourtique blends of fuel.


11 posted on 05/18/2011 12:52:20 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Most modern cars can run on:

85% Octane Gasoline
87% Octane Gasoline
90% Octane Gasoline
85% Ethanol
100% Butanol

With changes to the fuel supply, injectors and computer...
100% Natural Gas
100% Propane (or 70% propane and 30% diesel)

So.... why do we need this law?


12 posted on 05/18/2011 12:54:09 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis
My diesel truck runs just fine on the alternative vegi fuel, so I guess I’ve got it covered.

I heard about a case recently where they went after a local man for tax evasion, because he was running home made vegoil diesel in his pickup.
13 posted on 05/18/2011 1:52:55 PM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The bill means nothing ,, almost all cars can run on E85 which is an “alternative fuel” ,, since the bill makes no sense it should be discarded.


14 posted on 05/18/2011 2:27:11 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stompk

They will get you one way or the other. You can by vegi diesel at some stations, so a diesel is still a multiple fuel engine.


15 posted on 05/18/2011 4:27:41 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
...since the bill makes no sense it should be discarded.

CORRECTION: Since Representative Shimkus makes no sense, he should be discarded.

16 posted on 05/18/2011 5:26:37 PM PDT by HKMk23 (A free man unarmed is just a slave on borrowed time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

What’s so bad about this? It requires that cars accept alternative fuel? right now, ethanol can ruin a car....if they fix cars to accept it, we won’t have so many car repairs...


17 posted on 05/30/2011 12:19:41 PM PDT by Fawn (No--bama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson