Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot?(Did Seals take ANY fire?)
Time/Swampland ^ | 3 May 2011 | Michael Crowley

Posted on 05/03/2011 5:18:12 PM PDT by PilotDave

A major question lingers unanswered at the center of this story: Why was bin Laden killed? Michael Scherer has reported that the Navy Seals who landed at Osama bin Laden’s safehouse were not given orders specifically to kill, but were on a “kill or capture” mission. That implies they were prepared to accept bin Laden’s surrender. It didn’t work out that way. But despite earlier reports to the contrary, including from White House counter-terror adviser John Brennan, Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters Tuesday that bin Laden was in fact unarmed. (“Resistance does not require a firearm,” he said.) So, what happened?

(Excerpt) Read more at swampland.time.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: laden; obama; obltermination; osama; shiftingstory; usama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
Enemy fire did NOT bring down heli. Bin Laden was unarmed. Only 5-6 killed. NO Guards at House? NO Resistance that I can find reported at all? All previously reported fire hass been debunked? Women and teen family members shot... As a former combat rated military officer I'm getting uneasy here.
1 posted on 05/03/2011 5:18:22 PM PDT by PilotDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

Who. Cares.


2 posted on 05/03/2011 5:20:49 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave
So what?

We murdered him, BFD... why don't all you idiots pause and remember this...


3 posted on 05/03/2011 5:21:47 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

CIA Director Leon Panetta: “Authorities” Were To Kill Bin Laden

“The authorities we have on Bin Laden are to kill him. And that was made clear. But it was also, as part of their rules of engagement, if he suddenly put up his hands and offered to be captured, then— they would have the opportunity, obviously, to capture him. But that opportunity never developed,” CIA director Leon Panetta told NBC News.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/03/cia_director_leon_panetta_orders_were_to_kill_bin_laden.html

I’m getting dizzy trying to keep these stories straight.


4 posted on 05/03/2011 5:22:06 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

I agree. There is something off about the account of what happened at that compound.


5 posted on 05/03/2011 5:22:13 PM PDT by svcw (Non forgiveness is like holding a hot coal thinking the other person will be blistered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

My bet is that we did not deliver the kill bullet.


6 posted on 05/03/2011 5:22:34 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

I could not care less.
The people in The World Trade Center didn’t have guns either. The people on the hijacked planes didn’t have guns, they didn’t fire shots back, they couldn’t defend themselves. F*** bin Laden.


7 posted on 05/03/2011 5:22:46 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (What, if not a bagel and coffee, confirms the existence of a just and loving God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

What specifically makes you uneasy? What malfeasance are you hinting at?


8 posted on 05/03/2011 5:22:46 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

9 posted on 05/03/2011 5:23:12 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (One of these days, Alice....one of these days.....POW!! Right in the kisser!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

3000 people in the Towers, Pentagon and Planes were unarmed too....


10 posted on 05/03/2011 5:23:23 PM PDT by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave


11 posted on 05/03/2011 5:23:34 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

The only regret I have is that he wasn’t tortured Jack Bauer style before he was shot.


12 posted on 05/03/2011 5:23:46 PM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

Q: “Sargent, when you shot Bin Laden in the forehead, what did you feel??”

A: “Recoil.”


13 posted on 05/03/2011 5:24:18 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Vengeance, Victory, Gratitude, Remembrance, Vigilance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

Like the Florida Sheriff said when his deputies shot and killed a cop killer when asked, “Why did your deputies fire their weapons 42 times?”

“Because that’s all the bullets they had in them.”


14 posted on 05/03/2011 5:24:28 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

He did not surrender. He was then killed. End of story. This was NOT delta force.


15 posted on 05/03/2011 5:24:31 PM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

16 posted on 05/03/2011 5:24:58 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave
“I'm getting uneasy here.”

With your experience how could you possibly be getting uneasy about killing the bastard?

17 posted on 05/03/2011 5:25:18 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

Why would a man with a bounty on his head not have a weapon with him at all times?


18 posted on 05/03/2011 5:26:18 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Because the SEAL doing time for a f****** bloody nose can now cite precident and demand a new trial.

Or has standing in demanding these other guys are tried.

Anyway you look at it, this story is so new, no one knows where it can go, but one thing is certain, it sinks zero and his administration.

19 posted on 05/03/2011 5:26:28 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

>He did not surrender. He was then killed.

If he was unarmed, wouldn’t it be easier to just beat him down with their own bare hands? Just like the Joker said ‘using a gun is too quick. You can’t savor the suffering. That’s why I use a knife”.


20 posted on 05/03/2011 5:27:11 PM PDT by max americana (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson