Posted on 05/03/2011 1:14:33 AM PDT by RobinMasters
The Odds are Racist.
by Miss Tickly
I feel very sorry for Barrack Obama. The Odds are against him. The Odds must be racist.
The fact is, when Obama released his long form birth certificate last week, some people (like myself) decided it was time to give Obama the benefit of the doubt. We decided it was best to accept the record as authentic…although in doing so, I also had to accept that Obama is a narcissistic, sociopathic asshole with horrible judgment and the maturity level of a seven year old brat.
But none-the-less, I had all but resigned myself to this logical conclusion….until the Odds started whispering their racist hate-speech in my ear. Evidently, the Odds cannot stand that a black man is POTUS.
The Odds say that Obama is a liar and a document forger. The Odds say Obama has been busy unfairly ridiculing ordinary American folks for asking a simple question. The Odds say Obama is a common criminal and that there is a conspiracy underway.
In fact, the Odds say that Obama presented us with a poorly-made, phony birth certificate that likely came from one of the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates.
Racist or not, the Odds are rarely wrong.
Much has already been written on anomalies found in the electronic image of Obama’s ‘long form birth certificate’ (LFBC). Curiosity got the best of me and last night I started to take a closer look. Like others, I noticed type alignment inconsistencies right away. There are many of them, both horizontal and vertical, and they appeared to indicate the form had been ejected and reloaded into a typewriter multiple times before it was actually completed.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
With regard to the cases of identical pixelation cited on the website, that is certainly strange, but you can see the same thing throughout the document in places that would not have to be altered when creating a new certificate from an existing one.
For example, look at the lower case letter “d” in the following words:
“Maiden” (block 13)
both d’s in “Mailing Address” (block 7f)
the first d in “Street Address” (block 7d)
“judicial” (block 7e)
“true and correct”
“Outside” (block 17a)
“Industry” (block 12b)
“Residence” (blocks 7e and 7g)
They are ALL identical at the pixel level.
Sorry, but this “discovery” doesn’t prove anything.
I should add that I was referencing the “original” pdf document as downloaded from the White House site.
I know nothing about authenticity of documents, but it would seem that a space before the comma means nothing there but human error.
thanks again for the hard work-
it’s called building a case-
the trick is getting enough overwhelming information,
then prove it to a public that will be shielded from
this by the media
Back in the 60s, typing wasn't part of the curriculum until the Junion year, here in Ohio. I took typing in the 11th and 12 grades, 1965-66, and was taught on manual typewriters. Electric typewriters existed, but they were too expensive at that time.
I was actually referring to manual typewriters. (The new typewriter my parents purchased for me when I went off to college in September 1964 was a manual typewriter.) I taught myself typing so I couldn't say what they might teach in schools.
One of the things that was good to know was how insert a letter within a word where it had been omitted. You could white-out wrong letters but you couldn't make the space between two neighboring words bigger. Say you typed thir instead of their. The technique was to white-out the thir, and then half-backspace before where the t was and then retype it. Ditto for the h, and so on until the r wound up with only half a space between it and the next word. The electric typewriters I used could also do this.
ML/NJ
It does not matter how good zero’s best forger is, there will always be someone better in the general population.
I think the trick is to come up with one something so simple and irrefutable that can be presented within a minute. See my More Big and Little Pixels (Simple Picture Shows Obama BC is Bogus) posted yesterday.
ML/NJ
Do any of the BCs have weight/length of baby? I’ve never seen one that didn’t.
A noob profressional “debunker” all over these threads. Maybe he’s one of the Snope team although personally I think he draws a check from the administration.
The problem is that it's not a full space. After sleeping on it, I still don't have a really satisfactory explanation for why it would be there. The second issue I alluded to last night is solved, but this one, not really.
It's definitely possible that the typist could have realized she had put a space where there should've been a comma, and then done a half backspace and typed the comma in. But why not do a whole backspace? It's feasible, but it's a little bit odd.
It's also possible the typewriter could've jumped a bit at that exact moment. These machines were mechanical devices, and some of them didn't function 100% like you expected them to.
Or, it might have been possible that the typist accidentally hit the space bar at that moment too, or another key.
Or, the paper might have slipped and been readjusted by the typist.
Now that I think about it, at the moment that last possibility seems the more likely one.
Or, it could be a subtle indicator of a forgery at the paper level in Hawaii. That's a possibility as well.
Which is it? At this point, it seems very difficult to say.
I would assume that you mean me, LJ.
I don’t really mind your numerous ad hominem attacks (with absolutely zero engagement or discussion of the actual issues), but if you’re going to make false accusations and slurs regarding me to a third party (even without calling me by name), then I would at least appreciate the courtesy of being pinged.
If anyone wants to know my actual positions and record of my participation here, they are free to read my profile and my comments dating back for more than a year.
I realize that for the elitist crowd here a year is nothing and that if you didn’t sign up in 1999, you’re just plain trailer trash. But honestly, that attitude is very offputting. If you have any interest in actually changing the world, you’ll need to extend open arms to newer people - as most FReepers do.
Most FReepers, you see, are honorable people.
You’ll also need to appreciate that belief in birtherism is not a litmus test for conservatism, and further that if you do your best to drive away other conservatives, you’ll never have the ability to deal with the real liberal challenges we face. United we stand and divided we fall, and in spite of what you might think, the authenticity or forgery of Barack Obama’s birth certificate is not the defining issue of conservatism.
If it’s authentic, it’s authentic. If it’s forged, it’s forged. I personally would rather know the actual truth than just say, “Hey, no matter what the evidence might be, it’s forged! Okay, we’re done. We can all go home. Or go on a half-baked crusade to try and oust somebody when we really don’t know whether we’re acting in regard to the truth or not.”
In fact, since you seem so bent on splitting conservatives and driving away any who don’t agree with your position (in spite of the fact that you personally don’t present one single original thought, or one single shred of evidence for it), I would say that you fit the profile of a liberal “mole” a good deal more than I do.
An honest person engages the issues on a factual and logical basis. A troll who’s bent on sowing disunity agitates and engages in ad hominem attacks.
As far as my interest in the issue goes, quite frankly, I like a mystery, and all the more so when I can be a part of solving it.
Pinged to wrong Tiger.
Walks like duck.
More junk from you. Noob is nothing, there are recent signups all the time who aren’t trolls.
It’s the content of the posts that seals the deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
