Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UP NEXT: Trump on Geraldo to discuss the birth certificate
FOX NEWS | March 26, 2011

Posted on 03/26/2011 7:21:39 PM PDT by patlin

Trump up next on Geraldo! Watch it LIVE!


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthers; birthertrump; certifigate; constitution; geraldo; naturalborncitizen; nba; nbc; obama; thedonald; trump; usurper; whoraldo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Danae
She is one of the very few people I won’t even pray for. I cannot do it with any genuine feeling

You are lookikng it all wrong. You pray for your country & your elected representatives, leave personal feeling aside. Just keep your love of your God & Country as the real benefactors of your prayer for them. Keep it general, pray for all their health & pray that God will work in them. Keep it simple and non specific. God knows who they are and he will not rebuke you.

61 posted on 03/26/2011 9:02:18 PM PDT by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
and Geraldo says it’s in Al Capone’s vault.

And Capone's vault was empty

62 posted on 03/26/2011 9:03:17 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patlin

That is pretty much what I do. But when focused on a person in particular, I do so with love as the focus. I can’t do that with her. I don’t have any love for her.


63 posted on 03/26/2011 9:08:46 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Yep, that’s the document that should send Pelosi and the other woman to prison.


64 posted on 03/26/2011 9:08:46 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Yikes! Either I never noticed that or I’m too dang old to keep track of all this stuff anymore. Thanks for pointing that out.


65 posted on 03/26/2011 9:12:19 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Beware the ENEMEDIA ... Never Again! Support our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Danae
That's her signature, and it is also evidence of PURJURY. She KNOWS he isn't eligible and never was.

Think about it. It doesn't even matter what she knows, or what we know. The perjury trial can begin TOMORROW. She certified that he was eligible, with absolutely NO PROOF.

66 posted on 03/26/2011 9:13:07 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MagnoliaB

The entire communist DNC cabal should have need to worry, if you ask me.


67 posted on 03/26/2011 9:13:39 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Beware the ENEMEDIA ... Never Again! Support our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
That has to be a fake, it say's Dept of Poopy.
What do I know, I'm just a dumbass American.
68 posted on 03/26/2011 9:14:04 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: patlin

Here are South Dakota laws:

http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Statute=12&Type=Statute

Here is where the national party is required to send a letter to your state:

http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Type=Statute&Statute=12-8-8

“In years when a President and vice president are nominated and the national party conventions are held at such a late date as to make the foregoing provisions impossible, then, the secretary of state shall make the certification not later than seven days after nominations of such President and vice president.”

Here are more party responsiblities as to Presidential contests:

http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Type=Statute&Statute=12-5-3.11

“12.5
...
The nominating petition shall contain a statement indicating the candidates for delegates collective preference choice for President of the United States, if any, or that the candidates have no preference or are uncommitted. No name of any candidate for delegate or alternate may be filed in more than one slate.”

http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Type=Statute&Statute=12-5-3.16

“12-5-3.16. Certification of names of national convention nominees for President and vice-president—Alternate certification. The chairperson of the national convention of each political party recognized pursuant to § 12-1-3 or 12-5-1 shall certify the names of the convention nominees for President and vice-president of each political party to the secretary of state immediately following the convention. If the national certification is not received or is inconclusive, the names shall be certified by the state chairperson of that party at the request of the secretary of state.”

This is used if the convention is after the ‘normal’ date for candidate submission. Which I think is the case for 2008.

So in looking at this I do not see any requirement to sign-off or certify specific constitutional eligibility. So there was no reason to send your SOS a letter with the Constitutional eligibility language.

In Hawaii there is a specific law requiring such declaration in the document declaring the candidates for the ballot. Since the local Hawaii declaration did NOT include this the DNC letter had to be reworked to include it and the the COE, Kevin Cronin was allowed, by law, to make an decision to use the national declaration instead of the local one. When he was asked to release the documents used to validate Obama/Biden he released BOTH the local and national letters. This makes it look like he used or accepted both. But that is not the law. The law is one or the other. Obviously he had to use the national letter with full language that was not included in the Brian Schatz letter.


69 posted on 03/26/2011 9:14:16 PM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: patlin; LucyT

“All we have to do in 2012 is elect a REAL American president.”

Amb. John Bolton on Judge Jenine

(I had to catch it again on the re-run to make sure I heard it right)


70 posted on 03/26/2011 9:18:17 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

I have the state laws & I have discussed them with the SD SOS. But thanks for thinking I needed educating on my states election laws. There is code & there is procedure/policy that must be followed. The procedure/policy for the SOS pertaining to this is not listed in the online state code. All that is, is an abstract.


71 posted on 03/26/2011 9:20:33 PM PDT by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Okay, but I don’t see how that lets Barry off the hook. Yes, Nazi Pelousy signed it, but he knows better than anyone he is not eligible. What these commies managed to pull of is far more than purjury, it is outright TREASON! They basically overthrew the republic with a silent coup.


72 posted on 03/26/2011 9:21:04 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Beware the ENEMEDIA ... Never Again! Support our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Bingo. All we need is a DA with a pair of stones and a grand jury.

Want to bet Nancy would sing like a bird on Barry then? Oh I do think so, particularly if she got immunity for it. This is actually why I believe she has stayed in the house instead of resigning. A sitting member of congress is pretty much immune to prosecution unless kicked out. I think that is why she didn’t resign upon losing the speakership. I think this is why she has taken the huge hit to her ego and sucked it up... Staying in congress protects her from prosecution. Resigining opens her up to criminal charges. It isn’t as if she doesn’t know that we know what she did and what it means. She knows damn well we know what she did.


73 posted on 03/26/2011 9:24:19 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Photobucket
74 posted on 03/26/2011 9:27:00 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Oh he isn’t off my hook, No way. I want that bastard in prison for the rest of his natural life.


75 posted on 03/26/2011 9:27:00 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

ROFL

I was like... What the heck... Oh.. its a coon! LOL

The ones that would climb my poarch at night were HUGE. Brooms and the dog didn’t scare one of em off. I had to get the bb gun out more than once to chase that bugger off.


76 posted on 03/26/2011 9:30:02 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: patlin
With 2 wars and now the Lybia whatever escapade of obama’s, we need a CIC with knowledge of miltary foreign affairs, the military itself and knows how they are to be respected & treated.

In that case make Make it WEST / Trump 2012!

77 posted on 03/26/2011 9:32:16 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Beware the ENEMEDIA ... Never Again! Support our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6
COE, Kevin Cronin was allowed, by law, to make an decision to use the national declaration instead of the local one.

I haven't read the entire law, but it would seem logical that to accept something it has to be stamped certified that is was accepted. As far as my state, do you know how a "closed party" state works? If you noticed in our laws, the sections where the major parties & candidate swear that the candidates are eligible was repealed. This happened when our state went closed party. Those laws that were repealed are now part of the permanent policy/procedure in the SD Election Commission bylaws. That is why you do not find them in the SD Code. The SOS is the head of the SD Election Commission and thereby must abide by those bylaws as well as SD State Election code. We are working on getting the repealed law reenacted with stronger language. We failed this year. We will try again starting this fall and all the media coverage & especially the Huckmeisters comment tonight that they are not vetted by the parties for birth eligibility, we will have a stronger case for implementation.

78 posted on 03/26/2011 9:33:21 PM PDT by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm
I would rather him be ineligible and void everything he’s done rather than impeached and leave all his trash behind.

EXACTLY! Not only that, we the taxpayers would not be saddled with supporting him and his heirs for the rest of their/our lives!

79 posted on 03/26/2011 9:34:32 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Beware the ENEMEDIA ... Never Again! Support our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

Too Funny & no they weren’t as graceful on the dance floor as these, LOL


80 posted on 03/26/2011 9:35:13 PM PDT by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson