Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sean Hannity on Fox News Again Passionately Defends Birthers: Just Release the Birth Certificate
Obama Release Your Records ^ | March 24, 2011 | Obama Release Your Records

Posted on 03/25/2011 2:06:37 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Video: Again, Sean Hannity on Fox News passionately defends Birthers AKA Constitutionalists. The short segment aired on 3/24/2011...

Note to Sean Hannity: It is hard to release something that doesn't exists anywhere in Hawaii.

Note to Caroline Heldman: John McCain was forced to prove his "natural born Citizen" status to run for President in 2008. Is that racist? Also, Dwight D. Eisenhower had to file his birth certificate when he ran for President. Is that racist? The facts don't lie! The evidence is clear!

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birtherhannity; certifigate; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2011 2:06:38 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Regardless of whether BO is an American Citizen, which I doubt, all Presidential hopefuls should be required to prove it in order to be put on the ballot.

At this point it doesn’t matter. If Jose the strawberry picker can get a fake birth certificate I’m pretty sure BO can at this point.


2 posted on 03/25/2011 2:13:16 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Hannity still doesn’t get why.

When asked why other presidents haven’t been asked to show theirs, the answer is because no other president had a foreign father, grew up in a foreign country, and has such an otherwise shadowy background.

I am starting to believe that Obama is Soros’s Manchurian Candidate.


3 posted on 03/25/2011 2:17:29 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: truthbetold11

Uhmm
Are you sure that you are at the right forum?

We are talking series and huge stuff here! 8)


5 posted on 03/25/2011 2:42:44 PM PDT by freejohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthbetold11

wow, thats a very interesting post.

The holocaust was only 500,000, that means all those dead people arent really dead.


6 posted on 03/25/2011 2:43:44 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

There are ways of seeing for sure whether a record is authentic, and it’s not just by looking at the physical piece of paper. There has to be the matching computer transaction log.

For instance, right now if the Passport Office coughed up copies of Obama’s passport documents they might look legitimate. But even the Department of State says they cannot guarantee that the documents they would print out are genuine, because they don’t know whether the 3 breaches of Obama’s passport file in 2008 resulted in any of the file being ALTERED. They can find that out. They can look at the computer records and find out not only that the file was accessed but what, if anything, was DONE to the file. That would be very critical to know, if Obama ever wanted to use that passport.

And if anybody wanted to know whether Obama is a US citizen right now it would be important for them to look at his passport as well as any other citizenship records he might have. If there was a court case where a person could get discovery of all of Obama’s birth and citizenship records, including the embedded logs and transaction history, that person would be able to find out what, if anything, was changed in Obama’s passport record, what the history of his citizenship was - when he got his first passport and under what country, etc. Every record that has been entered into a computer system would have a date of origination and a history of what happened to the record since it was created.

If we looked at what has happened to the Hawaii birth record for Mae Obado we would probably find that she had an original record that was entered into the system whenever they converted to electronic database. We would probably find that a duplicate record was created for her sometime maybe in March of 2010. The database immediately marked it as a duplicate so that the entry for that became “Obado, Duplicate Mae” - unbeknownst to whoever created the duplicate. Whoever created the duplicate immediately changed Mae Obado’s name to Barack Hussein Obama II, not realizing that the record he/she had just created was NOT still called “Obado, Mae” in the database but was now “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” so what was changed to Obama was the ORIGINAL record for Mae Obado, leaving for Mae Obado only the “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” record. The end result is that a printout would show “Obado, Duplicate Mae”, followed next in line by “Obama, Barack Hussein II” - since the original record for Mae Obado was altered to say Barack Hussein Obama II.

The duplicate record for Mae Obado when there isn’t any original record for Mae Obado gives away that the original record was altered after a duplicate was created for her.

And that’s exactly what the HDOH had in their (supposed) 1960-64 birth index book as of sometime after March, 2010.

(This kind of sloppy work shows up in regards to the alleged birth announcements for Obama as well.)

If we looked up the history for the BC# that Obama has on the Factcheck COLB we would probably find that it originated in 1961 under a different name. We would be able to find out who that BC# originally belonged to. We would be able to find out when the name associated with that BC# was altered and by whom.

See, if a person has access to the embedded records they can find out the truth. That is why Obama NEEDS the courts to say his records are nobody’s business - to keep them from being able to get discovery.

And the Soros thugs were so desperate to make sure that the judges would never allow “standing” in court so discovery could be granted, that they made some kind of threat to at least Judge Surick - as evidenced by the fact that Surick received his “decision” saying Phil Berg had no standing from somebody by fax and he forwarded it to Berg as if it was his own ruling. That is known because when Surick forwarded the “decision” to Berg it still had on it the original date/time stamp from when Surick received the original fax. The automatic features of forwarding a fax revealed what had happened; that stamp is on every page of that forwarded “decision”. See http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/

So we ALREADY have evidence of big-time crimes being committed by government officials to cover up for Obama. The evidence already exists; it’s too late for Obama to put the genie back in the bottle.

We just can’t find anybody in the media, law enforcement, courts, or state or federal legislatures who will do anything about it. And THAT is the real story of Obama’s eligibility issue.

When we find out why Judge Surick allowed somebody else to write his decision for him, we will probably be well on our way to understanding why EVERYBODY within government, media, law enforcement, and the courts has bent over backwards - even to the point of creating forgeries and breaking laws - to cover for Obama. When we know what threat they used on all these judges, etc it will tell us who is holding America’s entire infrastructure hostage today.


7 posted on 03/25/2011 2:50:11 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthbetold11

Interesting...one Jew for each mile to the moon. What do you think it means?!?!


8 posted on 03/25/2011 2:54:13 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthbetold11

Are you saying that the real number is 500,000 or 6 million?


9 posted on 03/25/2011 2:59:05 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthbetold11

WTF?


10 posted on 03/25/2011 3:09:13 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
...that means all those dead people arent really dead.

No, actually it means some of those dead people died multiple times. That's what drives the count so high.

Regards,
GtG

11 posted on 03/25/2011 3:28:13 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

got to disagree with ya on this one


12 posted on 03/25/2011 3:36:05 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Whoever created the duplicate immediately changed Mae Obado’s name to Barack Hussein Obama II, not realizing that the record he/she had just created was NOT still called “Obado, Mae” in the database but was now “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” so what was changed to Obama was the ORIGINAL record for Mae Obado, leaving for Mae Obado only the “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” record. The end result is that a printout would show “Obado, Duplicate Mae”, followed next in line by “Obama, Barack Hussein II” - since the original record for Mae Obado was altered to say Barack Hussein Obama II.

If I read what you wrote correctly it seems to assume that an original record and a duplicate would be filed "right next to each other". What ever "next to" means in a computer. That would mean you'd have to copy the entire file to a scratch file up to the point of insertion. Then you'd copy in the new listing to the scratch file. Then you'd have to copy in the rest of the original file starting after the point of insertion. Then you'd have to replace the original file with the scratch file. If all your computer had for external storage was sequential tape drives that would be the only way to create such a sequential file.

All modern computers use random access disk drives and data are filed so that the last entry is added to the end of the file if no other space is available from deleted records. Any additions or corrections therefore have no physical proximity to the original listing being duplicated. Each data record is located by assigning one or more "keys". Example: a phone directory file will assign keys for each field in the record. Key1 might be area code, key2 might be phone number, key3 might be last name, and so on to keyn being zip code. Now to retrieve records in order you just sort the key fields in descending order of priority. You can therefore produce lists of phone numbers within a given zip code, enter an address and get the assigned phone number or enter a phone number and retrieve the name attached to it. All without moving the records on the drive. That is the difference between a simple flat file and a "database".

The sorted keys point to the required records which are retrieved by the disk drive skipping around. The actual data file elements are not moved by the process and remain in their original location until the file is reorganized (often done to "squeeze" out the deleted records, it reduces the required storage space. see disk fragmentation)

This rather long discussion should support what follows:
Since the original record and it's duplicate are never in proximity and since changing the name will alter several indexing keys, a printout will never show them as sequential.

Regards,
GtG

13 posted on 03/25/2011 4:15:22 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
got to disagree with ya on this one

You have every right... I picked a terrible topic to write a silly response to. My bad.

Regards,
GtG

14 posted on 03/25/2011 6:20:17 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthbetold11

holocaust denier - wow
Perhaps you were not aware, but Nazi’s kept meticulous records. Have you seen the pictures?

Moon landing faked - wow
Just a thought but how much friction do you think the spacecraft encountered (or would have - yikes) on 99% of the trip to the moon?
*And*
Who placed the reflectors on the moon that are used to accurately measure the distance to the moon from earth?


15 posted on 03/25/2011 6:28:29 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

I see, I was kinda worried about you there sir.


16 posted on 03/25/2011 6:45:14 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Triple

“Who placed the reflectors on the moon that are used to accurately measure the distance to the moon from earth?”

I have it on good authority that Elvis placed the reflectors with assistance from Jimmy Hendrix.


17 posted on 03/25/2011 6:48:00 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

All presidential hopefulls should pass a national security TOP SECRET clearance check.


18 posted on 03/25/2011 6:58:05 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Most couldn’t. Admit you’ve taken hard drugs or even pot more than a couple times and you won’t qualify.


19 posted on 03/25/2011 7:00:55 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; LucyT; warsaw44; ColdOne; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; GQuagmire; wintertime; ...

Ping...............

LOL! Hannity again! The Communist Civil Rights defender said “go see the BC, it’s out there” Hannity said, I’d like to. Commie, why don’t you? Hannity, they won’t let anybody see it. Commie, {{{CRICKETS}}}

Communists’ passionate defense is propagating people to hear about the stealth BC...It’s more advertised in 48 hours than it ever did in 3 years!

Thank God for dumb “intellectual and brilliant” Communists!


20 posted on 03/25/2011 7:08:34 PM PDT by melancholy (Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson