Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pleased to meet you, I'm a federal employee
argusleader.com/ ^ | March 2, 2011 | Mark A. Young

Posted on 03/02/2011 6:09:10 AM PST by Poundstone

I am proud to be a federal employee. Let me repeat, proud to be one of millions across the nation who work as a public servant and who believes that public employees choose careers so they can be a vital part of the glue that holds this nation together.

Who are we? We are your neighbors, we are your friends, we are your fellow parishioners, and the people who sit with you watching the children and grandchildren at the ballpark or the basketball court.

We are not faceless and anonymous "others." We are people you have known all your lives.

(Excerpt) Read more at argusleader.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: benefits; employee; federal; government; leech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: jda
There is another category of federal employee. The Department of Defense has a large group of federal civilian employees who deploy constantly back and forth to AF, Iraq, Bosnia, DAOs in Africa, and other lousy places to support the troops. We are not unionized, we rarely have 40 hour work weeks, and we keep the troops fed, housed, repaired and supplied.

As much as I personally hate the other agencies in the Federal government, I hope people remember that the only real duty for the government in the constitution is the defense of the country.

101 posted on 03/02/2011 7:46:20 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: guerito1; Poundstone
No, you are the sycophants that are draining this nation of its life-blood. You are worthless, blood-sucking bastards. Government employees ... are like kudzu.

Ditto!

102 posted on 03/02/2011 7:51:26 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

Thanks Moe!


103 posted on 03/02/2011 8:03:16 AM PST by agere_contra (Historically every time the Left has 'expanded its moral imagination' the results have been horrific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
And 650K in a 401(K) isn’t actually all that much, especially in a high-cost city like Washington.

Are you taking a day off from your VA job where you go around pouring salt in old wounds, and switching pills at random?

That level of 401k savings is FAR BEYOND THE NORM. It is rare. In 2007 the MEDIAN value of retirement savings for those 55-65 was only $100,000. And that is the maximum of all age cohorts. The median of all is only $45,000.

The 401k you are complaining about as too low is 6.5 times bigger than the average of those nearing retirement. Source: What are Average Retirement Savings for Different Age Groups? 401kPlanning.org

You can go to hell. Thanks! /not.

104 posted on 03/02/2011 8:04:16 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

L

105 posted on 03/02/2011 8:09:01 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
That level of 401k savings is FAR BEYOND THE NORM.

Well, at least the consolation will be that in a short time here, we will be made aware that GDP is being overinflated with government borrow and spend practices by 25% to 50%.

Eventually that day will come. We saw what happened in the private sector when private people deleveraged. We saw the housing bubble burst. It will be interesting what happens when the government cannot maintain the charade any more.

So, the 401ks will probably turn out to not be quite what people are thinking they are.

106 posted on 03/02/2011 8:11:47 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Letting Obama supporters vote is like giving a loaded gun to a child with severe mental retardation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

To: ClearCase_guy
The country is broke. We have no money. The government is trying to do things which it ought not to do -- unconstitutional things. We need to limit what government tries to do.

Therein lies the crux of the problem. IF we could ever scale back the federal government to its Constitutional limits I would bet that we could exist with about 10% of the current workforce and perhaps a bit higher percentage of overall COST.

The problem is that the bold-faced IF is a small word with a huge impact. Personally I doubt that I will see us ever come close to making serious progress toward this goal in my lifetime. Unless of course the SHTF and forces an existential re-start.

108 posted on 03/02/2011 8:15:49 AM PST by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Two things really make me want to sh*t fire: when a member of a legislative body lists his or her profession as a "legislator," and when a government employee claims to be a "public servant."

These types of people are at the front of the go f*ck yourselves line.

Taking that to mean that such people are the first to grab for themselves and the first to screw over the weak and meek, the orphans and widows -- ditto!

109 posted on 03/02/2011 8:19:58 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RoadKingSE

CSRS has been dead for 25 years. You cannot make arguments based on outdated plans that haven’t existed in a generation. I agree the salaries are high, but it really depends on what position. I don’t know a single GS-13 performing clerical work, but they may exist somewhere. Administrative generally tops at a GS-7. And it’s not whining, it’s pointing out that FReepers make statements that are not correct and it makes them look foolish.
For the record, my husband works in the private sector and has a better benefit structure than the Feds.


110 posted on 03/02/2011 8:21:30 AM PST by Hoodlum91 (There's a strange odor coming from the White House. Smells like BO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

I had that same thought when I read the headline...GMTA :)


111 posted on 03/02/2011 8:22:19 AM PST by Hoosier Catholic Momma (You know their time's coming to an end, we have to unify and watch our flag ascend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Atomic Vomit

Yes, Feds pay into both Social Security and Medicare. Retirement is NOT guaranteed, it is set up like any other private 401(k) where selections can be allocated for stocks, bonds, etc. Lots of Feds lost tons of retirement money with everyone else.

Termination should be made easier, but it can be done. At anytime a fed can be put on a performance plan. If the fail to meet the plan, they can be terminated. Still, this takes too long IMO since it can be a year long + process. A fed can be terminated on the spot if it’s during their probationary period (usually one year).


112 posted on 03/02/2011 8:26:27 AM PST by Hoodlum91 (There's a strange odor coming from the White House. Smells like BO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
Quite frankly its not too far a reach to state that whether or not civilized society survives will depend on its ability to transcend the limitations of the 18th-19th century bureaucratic structures and mindsets that characterize Federal, state and local government today.
113 posted on 03/02/2011 8:29:09 AM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: bvw
I found this to be a jaw-dropping little factoid: The DoD currently employs over 10,000 lawyers.

I was listening to a radio interview with Rummy on his latest book and he just mentioned that little factoid in passing. That is my source for the data, I didn't look it up, I figure that he was someone that would know that fact and wouldn't be lying about it. Ugh. (And, I bet that there are a whole slew of equaling disturbing facts about the number of lawyers employed in most other federal government agencies and departments. I wonder how much all of these lawyers and their attendant support staffs are costing us in total each year?)

115 posted on 03/02/2011 8:34:09 AM PST by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: zzeeman

Those lawyers are fighting each day to keep our freedoms safe from terrorism!

Or something.


116 posted on 03/02/2011 8:45:20 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Letting Obama supporters vote is like giving a loaded gun to a child with severe mental retardation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91

Sorry Hoodlum. CSRS is alive and well in the Federal ranks. No new employees have been added since 1990 but there are still a pantload that have not left their jobs...and look forward to retiring with 80% of pay, life insurance benefits, healthcare, and COLA. Regarding Grade inflation I know many GS-13 “Analysts” who don’t know the difference between the Executive and Judicial branches of government and spend their days rearranging piles of paper on their desks, or following contractors around, and GS-15’s whose major duties are planning meetings and menu’s.


117 posted on 03/02/2011 8:52:25 AM PST by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: zzeeman

The idea that there is no way to cut funding or cut employees at the DoD is absurd.

The mission of the armed forces is well beyond “protecting America” these days.

For two easy examples, Korea and the former Yugoslavia regions.

Why are we still there? Or is Clinton’s nation building project enshrined in FReeper/conservative dogma these days?

There are probably even a few obsolete or unnecessary weapons systems that could be cut from the budget.

We are $14 trillion in debt. Maybe it’s time to stop being the world’s policeman and tell the others to fend for themselves.

Want a military force to defend America?

Abolish the BATFE and unconstitutional gun laws (that would be all of them). Tell the men of the country they will be expected to own military-grade weapons and be proficient with them.

Stop demonizing citizen militias and encourage participation in them instead. Encourage former US military to participate and train the citizens.

But, being addicted to big government is so much easier.


118 posted on 03/02/2011 8:53:55 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Letting Obama supporters vote is like giving a loaded gun to a child with severe mental retardation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

I remember back in the late 90’s when people around here were actually AGAINST wasting the armed forces on nation building boondoggles.

Funny how things change.


119 posted on 03/02/2011 8:58:32 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Letting Obama supporters vote is like giving a loaded gun to a child with severe mental retardation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: PalmettoMason
I spent 24 years in both active Navy and Reserves. I really got to loathe DoD civilian employees after they screwed up my pay when I was going to school in the Navy (1973).

I checked-in on a weekend that was between pay periods (every two weeks). When I wasn't on the pay list a week later, I wasn't alarmed; two weeks after that and not on the pay list was a big problem. (I had less than five dollars before I was flat broke). My instructor told me to get over to disbursing.

After standing in four lines, I finally found the correct person (a DoD civilian employee). I explained that I hadn't been paid in three weeks. She was flustered at first and then said, “Maybe your records didn't get to us so we could open a pay record for you.”

Armed with that bit of knowledge, I walked up the stairs, out the side door, 80 feet across the parking lot, down the stairs to the personnel department.

When I came in, it appeared that everyone was on break except a female civilian and a Filipino Chief Personnelman. The female graced me with her presence, while the Chief raised an eyebrow. I explained the situation. She explained to me such things rarely happened but said she'd look in the files. I gave her my name and SSN. After a cursory look, she announced she couldn't find my service record.

The Filipino PNC looked disgusted. He came over and said, “Give me your name and SSN.” I did and he walked to the same file, thumbed through the drawer, pulled out my service record, and announced, “Yup, the file was never sent to disbursing to open your pay record. Take the file over and walk it through, then bring it back.” I took the file and went back to disbursing.

I got the same woman employee as before and told her that what she'd said was in fact the case as I handed her my records. Then she said, “Could you make due with a $100 advance on your pay until next payday? (That was another two weeks away!) We're closing the books out for the month.” Before I could answer “no”, she continued, “Besides we're about to go to lunch.”

I looked at my watch and it was 11:25 AM. I asked, “What's your lunch hour?” She said it was from 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM. I said, “I'll see you at 1:00 PM.” I then adjourned to the EM Club for a couple of $0.50 draft beers.

At 12:55 PM I came back to disbursing. The civilian pay clerk was working on my pay record. She proudly announced to me that it was as much trouble to do an advance on my pay as it was to pay me my three week's back pay, so she'd calculated it out. She presented me with my check, I signed for it, and I was assured I was now on the pay list. I took my personnel record back to the Filipino Chief Personnelmam. When I handed my personnel records back to him, he confided: “Stuff like this happens all the time. Sorry you had to go through this runaround.”

120 posted on 03/02/2011 9:11:17 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson