Comments?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Comments? Stupid article pushing the leftist agenda.
3 posted on
01/17/2011 9:40:45 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A woman's right to lead? Seriously? Now it's a freaking entitlement to be President?
4 posted on
01/17/2011 9:42:32 AM PST by
fr_freak
To: 2ndDivisionVet
There are brilliant, smart and sensible women. There are hateful, crazy women who see sexism EVERYWHERE and are on a crusade.
Which type will rise? Unfortunately, we get Hillary, Pelosi, Boxer, etc. Hillary is obsessed with hatred for her father, so the rest of us MUST PAY. Pelosi is just the worst type of political whore, Boxer is simple-minded, etc.
Why no great Republican women running for office? Some are surfacing, but it is a slow process.
5 posted on
01/17/2011 9:44:13 AM PST by
Squidster
To: 2ndDivisionVet
When Palin runs, I’m pretty sure no-one will be voting for her because she’s a woman.
All that identity-politics cr*p is on the other side, thank God.
6 posted on
01/17/2011 9:44:35 AM PST by
agere_contra
(The Left has 'expanded its moral imagination' ever since the 1800s - always with horrifying results)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
In the U.S., our leaders aren’t selected by “right” ... a woman will lead if and when one convinces a majority that she is the best candidate for the job. So far, no go.
SnakeDoc
9 posted on
01/17/2011 9:46:35 AM PST by
SnakeDoctor
("They made it evident to every man [...] that human beings are many, but men are few." -- Herodotus)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Golda Meier was a tough leader. Hunted down the islamic fascist that killed/shot the Israeli Olympic team and ended their miserable lives.
That toughness would not be bad at all.
10 posted on
01/17/2011 9:46:42 AM PST by
svcw
(God doesn't show up in our time, but He shows up on time)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
11 posted on
01/17/2011 9:47:49 AM PST by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How about this woman. Would this one be ok?
13 posted on
01/17/2011 9:48:22 AM PST by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She was attacked because the Left disagrees with her positions, which they especially worried about in her case because she is a charismatic woman—and they were afraid she’d peel off some of their female constituency. She wasn’t attacked because those on the left or the right fear a woman in power. Jeesh!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
United States remain the only industrialized nation in the world to shun a woman's right to lead? So now it's a right for some loony broad to 'lead'? Hillary was crushed by a more vicious commie. Had nothing to do with her alleged sex.
17 posted on
01/17/2011 9:50:32 AM PST by
Islander7
(There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
China, Japan, Taiwan, Russia, France, Spain, Italy, Belgium, and many other industrialized nations have never had a female head of State. I guess they’re all backwards too, but not worthy of direct condemnation...
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bull poop. The left would love Nancy pelosi or Hillary to run the country. They don’t hate Sarah because she is a woman. They hate her because she is an attractive, bold, Conservative woman.
19 posted on
01/17/2011 9:51:43 AM PST by
Yaelle
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How long will the United States remain the only industrialized nation in the world to shun a woman's right to lead? So by restricting things to "industrialized" nations, the author conveniently excludes places like Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. If we got a good female candidate, we'd elect her. In those places, they wouldn't. So there.
Besides, when did a woman run Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, France, Spain, Italy, etc? Since when are we the only nation to not have a female leader?
20 posted on
01/17/2011 9:52:15 AM PST by
pepsi_junkie
(Who is John Galt?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“How long will the United States remain the only industrialized nation in the world to shun a woman’s right to lead?
“
What a stupid statement and a bold faced lie.
22 posted on
01/17/2011 9:52:25 AM PST by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I just wonder how badly that loon Pelosi has damaged a woman’s chances of ever becoming president.
23 posted on
01/17/2011 9:53:07 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
("New laws are always a "good idea" until the first time you have to enforce them." - Unknown)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Seems to me we had a woman running the House and she really screwed up the nation. I don’t think it matters whether we elect men or women to office, what we ought to do is to elect men and women of CHARACTER to office rather than CHARACTERS or CARICATURES to office.
25 posted on
01/17/2011 9:54:37 AM PST by
MIchaelTArchangel
(Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The author clearly thinks what’s between her legs is more important than what’s in her brain.
26 posted on
01/17/2011 9:55:09 AM PST by
jimt
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t think Joyce has Sarah Palin or Phyllis Shafely in mind. A woman’s “right” to lead only applies to Nazi Botoxi and her ilk.
27 posted on
01/17/2011 9:55:44 AM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
woman's right to lead Odd...I didn't realise that women HAD a "right" to lead.
Earn it like everyone else, lady.
28 posted on
01/17/2011 9:56:18 AM PST by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson