How Can America “Thrive” with a Liar and Fraudster in the Office of the Presidency?

The Post and Email Blog ^ | Jan. 13, 2011 | Comment Left by a Reader

[DontTreadOnMe2009]

CBS News allowed the following comment to be published on its website, following an article about Obama’s visit to Arizona yesterday:

... Who were the doctor(s) and nurse(s) at Kapi`Olani that delivered Barack? My ex-wife worked at the hospital and I understand the records at Kapi’Olani are impeccable. Where are the foot prints? What public records exist that can even demonstrate that Mrs. Obama was even at Kapi’Olani on the day of Barack’s birth? Talk at Kapi`Olani, would have been unabashed, the city of Honolulu at the time very racist towards black people.

[TNTNT]

The bill I propose is stronger documentary legislation then the current Berman birther bill here in Texas you are in love with. LOL Passport standards are certainly adequate to determine eligibility, and I am positive that the vast majority of the people agree with me. I have yet to hear what your objection is to using the same standard for the eligibility BC as the passport BC. Are you claiming there is all kinds of passport fraud?

I have read the Montana bill and it does not define NBC, and gets you no closer to your goal. Nor does it have any provision regarding standing to sue if you disagree with the state's interpretation of NBC, which I guarantee you will not be happy with.

Frankly the legislation I propose is stronger than both the Texas and the Montana bills.

[TNTNT]

It looks like your argument is with the Democrats not me. I am agnostic on the issue and just don't see a groundswell of support for your position.

You are like clients I get once in a while, they don't like the legal advice I give because they have a preconceived idea of what it should be. I am the point of my life that I just tell them to find someone else. If you don't like it, too bad.

[Red Steel]

The bill I propose is stronger documentary legislation then the current Berman birther bill here in Texas you are in love with. LOL

Sure it is troll-bot /sarc.

Here you are --

"So all Obama has to do is file the certification document, and viola!! he's on the ballot in Texas. "

Viola!!

Oh, how happy you are Obot under your proposed plan. Obama gets on yippee!!! LoL.

I have read the Montana bill and it does not define NBC, and gets you no closer to your goal. Nor does it have any provision regarding standing to sue if you disagree with the state's interpretation of NBC, which I guarantee you will not be happy with.

Your guarantee is worthless... It doesn't have to dingbat. All it has to state is NBC. The would be usurper candidate(s) better have not gotten a foreign citizenship at birth as that would mean off to the Supreme Court we go and it doesn't have to be the state that sues.

Frankly the legislation I propose is stronger than both the Texas and the Montana bills.

More laughs!

[TNTNT]

I have never been a Freeper before. I found FreeRepublic when looking into the Lakin fiasco. Why do you think I was a Freeper before? Does my writing style remind you of someone. I am sure one of your birther buddies has tried to figure out who I am thru their spyware. Well Good luck.

[Red Steel]

I am sure one of your birther buddies has tried to figure out who I am thru their spyware. Well Good luck.

Spyware is the domain for Obots.

[melancholy]

Not a single answer from you, therefore, it must be my fault. Oh..wait, it’s Bush’s fault, maybe Sarah Palin’s!

You’re putting your finger in the dike. If your “legal” advice is just dancing, lack of curiosity and shifting, you must have many clients in jail.

Bye Mr. explosive conservative!

[TNTNT]

Your problem with reading comprehension crops up once again. The Viola! quote you are using had to do with the Berman birther bill, not my proposal. Another lie I catch you in, what is that, two dozen now?

You don't understand that just because a bill states ‘natural born citizen’ does NOT mean your crackpot theory. I can assure that the state will use the accepted legal definition of nbc, not your kooky theory. And you don’t have standing to sue if you disagree. Where does that get you? Nowhere.

IF, in a 1000 to 1 chance that a states goes with your crackpot theory, it will be met with immediate injunctive relief sought by the RNC, DNC and DOJ. It is a slam dunk they will prevail. In addition it will be tied up in the courts for 2-3 years. Where does this get you for the 2012 election? Nowhere.

Why not get a law on the books that will withstand Constitutional challenge, is reasonable and can be enforced using current, established standards. And best of all, make sure we have a NBC as President.

[TNTNT]

Your logic is mind boogling. Good bye

[grey_whiskers]

According to Ann Althouse and others Obama graduated magna cum laude -- quite a step down from summa.

Incidentally, claiming to have gone to Law School, and being on the law review is a *detriment*, as even Shakespeare knew.

Great lawyers aren't born: they *hatch*.

And I find it odd that after masturbating over your *misquote* of Obama's grades, you then recover and say "what do his grades have to do whether he is eligible"?

Hint: read this.

And consider the idea that his grades at Columbia (home of Frances Fox Piven, and of William Ayers at the same time Obama was supposed to be there, and of that poli-sci prof having an affair with his own daughter), like his SAT scores, source of funding for college and law school, and grad school scores and grades, are carefully kept out of the public eye, EXCEPT for propaganda phrases such as yours.

You're getting flustered and missing your talking points.

Cheers!

[Fantasywriter]

Of course it would be a LOL joke to you to be asked to link even one pro-conservative or one anti-Obama post you’ve ever made. You haven’t made any. You’re a flaming liberal who spreads obnoxious lies on FreeRepublic. Your posts are just about the only thing about this great site that stink. Every time you post, you vomit lies. In all my years at FR, I’ve never encountered anyone who disseminated as many falsehoods. You spread shame and dishonor with every word you post. [Though I notice that *after* I challenged you, you started dropping Reagan’s and Scalia’s names at a frantic clip. No sale. Freepers are not so stupid as to look at what you posted AFTER you were called out. You had nothing prior, and you know it.]

Btw, the question you asked me has been answered scores, if not hundreds, of times on these very threads—including several times by me. The only person who would even ask it is a full-on, straight-ahead liberal; conservatives, and even some moderate Dems, know the answer already. Whenever you ask it, you reveal yet again that you are a liberal troll.

I will not reply to you any more, UNLESS I hear from Red Steel or some other trustworthy conservative that you’ve changed your tune. For now, I’m frankly sick of the disservice you perform by being such an obvious, in-your-face troll, and posting your pathetic drivel on a fine conservative website like FR. But I wish you all the best, etc.

NOTE: The most pathetic people on the web always post again to someone who isn’t going to read their words. That’s how they reveal their ultimate pettiness and sad, sick obsession. There are several other trolls whom I ignore, because they have demonstrated (1) dishonesty, (2) ignorance, (3) mindless repetition, or (4) all three. Now you join their ranks. I won’t miss reading your twaddle, either; all you ever posted was deception and bile.

PS: IF you were a lawyer, you were a very bad one. Part of being a good lawyer is being persuasive. So far, the only things you’ve persuaded anyone of is that (1) you’re a troll, (2) you’re dishonest, and (3) your comments aren’t worth reading. You also use crappy grammar on occasion—not the prime sign of a sharp, well educated lawyer. As a matter of fact, I know some very good lawyers—and not one of them has a fraction of time to spare that you spend on FR. They are actually busy with their cases. (None of them are puerile enough to riff on people’s screennames, either.)

[TNTNT]

I will check on the Magna v. Summa. I was doing that from memory, and didn't look it up. Either way he graduated with Honors from Harvard Law School. Like I said what do his grades have to with eligibility?

Make a big enough stink and maybe he will release the records you want to see. I just don't think too many people really care about the issue and even less legislators.

BTW, I have no talking points, just answering questions. It is getting late, so good night.

[Red Steel]

Bullcrap Obot. It was your stupid bill that did not want a natural born citizen clause. It was your stupid proposed bill that would accept other rinky-dink documents other than a long form birth certificate. For your information again, The State Department will take just about anything. Obama could use his Government passport that was issued to him automatically. Some check that would be.

It is you who has a comprehension problem.

"Primary Proof of Identity

You can obtain a us passport if any of the following apply:

• Previously issued, undamaged U.S. passport
• Naturalization Certificate
• Valid Driver's License
• Current Government ID (city, state or federal)
• Current Military ID (military and dependents)

  
  And Secondary information that the State Department takes to get a passport if you are lacking primary. Applicants Obot don't even have to be natural born citizens as they can be only US nationals and naturalized citizens. You see how stupid you are? I guess not.

  
  

  Secondary Proof of Identity

  If you are unable to present primary proof of identification, you must submit as much secondary identification as possible. The information below will help you to determine what documents to submit as secondary identification. Each application is handled on a case-by-case basis. The information below is intended as general guidance.

  • A Combination of Signature Documents - Example: Social Security Card + Credit Card + Employee ID + Library Card
  • An Identifying Witness (someone who can swear to your identity) that is present at the time of you apply. He or she must:
    • Have known you for at least 2 years
    • Be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident
    • Have valid ID
    • Fill out Form DS-71: Affidavit of Identifying Witness in the presence of a Passport Agent"

      -end snip-

      Your stupid proposal rightly sucks. So you were right "Viola!!" troll-bot, Obama gets on the ballet with your silly bill proposal.

      You've been caught in so many lies Obot. How long do you think you have here retread?

[Red Steel]

BTW, I have no talking points, just answering questions. It is getting late, so good night.

Completely worthless answers.

[Gene Eric]

>> ... and that is all I need to know.

You seem easily satisfied given your devotion to the study law.

[Gene Eric]

the study of law.

[DontTreadOnMe2009]

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON 1:38 AM

[update below] Food for thought before continuing: Many of the death threats, against my family and me, I received at this blog and ‘am able to track back originate from threads at Fogbow, Politjab, Dr. Conspiracy’s blog and the Native Born Citizen blog. These are some of the most vile and hypocritical people on the face of the planet.

Via the Examiner; - Exclusive investigation: frantic effort to stop questions on Obama eligibility - Anthony Martin

Conservative Examiner can now reveal that 2 websites have been devoted to the singular purpose of maligning, disparaging, and threatening conservatives who wish to discover the truth about Obama’s background. Those sites are Politijab and Fogbow. The main players behind the scheme are those with the screen names of ‘Foggy,’ ‘Realist,’ and ‘Justin.’

Fogbow, by the way, is one of the main sources of libelous remarks about conservatives in the aftermath of the Tucson massacre. The site disparages conservatives on a continual basis,... ...Continue reading at Examiner.com: http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/exclusive-investigation-frantic-effort-to-stop-questions-on-obama-eligibility#ixzz1B5cVMQKx

Via the Examiner; - Updates to Fogbow/Politijab scandal—identities and breach of TOS - Anthony Martin

1/14/2011 - In a follow-up to yesterday’s report(above) concerning the unseemly tactics of Leftwing operatives to malign conservatives, more information can now be released.

Conservative Examiner has learned that many if not most of the masterminds behind the infamous ‘Politijab’ and ‘Fogbow’ websites are attorneys who are activists within the Leftwing extremist fringe of the Democratic Party.

1/13/2011 - Private investigators have revealed to Conservative Examiner the details of an investigation into the frantic effort by Obama operatives to stop all questions concerning the Constitutional issue of Presidential eligibility.

[Red Steel]

Food for thought before continuing: Many of the death threats, against my family and me, I received at this blog and ‘am able to track back originate from threads at Fogbow, Politjab, Dr. Conspiracy’s blog and the Native Born Citizen blog. These are some of the most vile and hypocritical people on the face of the planet.

I can second that. ORYR lets the Obots on his website post the most vile postings to let everyone see. You can see them posting how they are going to kill him and everyone in the tea party and birthers. It is Demo-crap Obots completely unplugged.

[grey_whiskers]

I graduated summa cum laude undergrad. That's how I remembered.

Cheers!

[Red Steel]

And in spite of the group's stated purpose of 'counteracting' claims by 'birthers' and 'Tea Partiers,' members of the group set out on a systematic campaign to wreak havoc on conservative sites by posing as conservatives, and then going on the attack against the Tea Party and conservative Republicans.

Fits TNTNT to the 'T'

[CanaGuy]

Everyone seems to have ignored this....Can some of you knowledgable types please comment on post #11. She seems to connect her friends comments with Obama’s doctor at the time of birth in Hawaii. Has her statement been bunked or debunked?