Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court declines case blaming energy companies
NOLA.com ^ | Jan. 10, 2011 | Joanne Wojcik

Posted on 01/11/2011 10:08:11 PM PST by moonshinner_09

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a request to reopen a lawsuit that charged energy companies with contributing to the effects of Hurricane Katrina by emitting greenhouse gases. The result means victory for about 30 energy companies that were being sued by Mississippi homeowners who claimed that by emitting greenhouse gases, the companies helped cause global warming and exacerbated Katrina’s wrath.

The Supreme Court was asked to step in after so many members of the 16-judge 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had recused themselves that it could not conduct a rehearing of a partially successful appeal of the suit.

At issue for the nation’s highest court was the question of whether the 5th Circuit should have dismissed the appeal after determining that it lacked a quorum.

Under the circuit court’s rules, the court’s original three-judge decision in favor of the homeowners had been vacated after the full court agreed to rehear the case, and the appeal was dismissed by the failure to get a quorum.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsurance.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Weather
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hurricanekatrina
Is this the start of a new wave of lawsuits by using global warming,emitting greenhouse gases,as why things happened the way they did ?
1 posted on 01/11/2011 10:08:16 PM PST by moonshinner_09
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

I detect signs of intelligent life on this planet after all.


2 posted on 01/11/2011 10:09:41 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

“by emitting greenhouse gases, the companies helped cause global warming and exacerbated Katrina’s wrath.”


o.k.... by rejecting the myth of global warming.... will this also apply to NOT GIVING ANY MORE $ to IT!!!!????

what is good for the goose.....


3 posted on 01/11/2011 10:10:41 PM PST by bareford101 (. All Muslims lie to infidels to confuse them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Decisions like this are the only thing that I can see that will rescue our society from the radical greenies.


4 posted on 01/11/2011 10:23:40 PM PST by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

I detect signs of intelligent life on this planet after all.

The Supreme Court is in fashion again. lol. Last week they were the enemy. This week they are fine. They went from Zero to Hero in a very short time. lol.


5 posted on 01/11/2011 10:44:08 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

What did they do last week that was so unpopular?


6 posted on 01/11/2011 11:01:27 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

The wonder is that it got this far. The local judge should have not only thrown it out, but also forcibly ripped the law licenses from the walls of the attorneys filing suit.


7 posted on 01/11/2011 11:10:59 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bareford101

“by emitting greenhouse gases, the companies helped cause global warming and exacerbated Katrina’s wrath.”

“o.k.... by rejecting the myth of global warming.... will this also apply to NOT GIVING ANY MORE $ to IT!!!!????”

How about putting forth this as a case to say that global warming has gone into the realm of dogma and not science. I’m also annoyed by the choice of words they used here. What do they mean by Katrina’s wrath? Gaia or some sort of old druidic faith? There’s plenty of other logical reasons as to what was going on wrong in the Gulf states with that hurricane, such as poorly organized evacuation plans for the states, districts, and cities, in the event of a hurricane. For someone who claims to be a person of reason that’s among the biggest sacks of dogma I have ever heard from them.


8 posted on 01/11/2011 11:22:59 PM PST by Morpheus2009 ("God doesn't play dice" - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
What do they mean by Katrina’s wrath? Gaia or some sort of old druidic faith?

It's a local thing. Folks get plastered by a horrific storm, they give it near mythic powers. We still speak in terms of BC & AC (Before Camille and After Camille). That one was in 1969.

They all personalities, Betsy, Opal, Fredrick, Georges....

9 posted on 01/11/2011 11:53:27 PM PST by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

I hope that those who brought this lawsuit have to pay restitution 10 times over for this frivolousness.


10 posted on 01/12/2011 1:09:02 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Somehow, “the courts” stumbled into a sane conclusion to the matter.


11 posted on 01/12/2011 1:11:48 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48; narses; neverdem; SunkenCiv

And the future of the world’s economy rests on a single man; just a slim 5-4 majority (sometimes, not even that!) is all that is between us and the world’s socialists.


12 posted on 01/12/2011 2:29:24 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Could it simply be that the court did not necessarily reject the principle of AGW, but reject a sufficient nexus between the actions of the defendants and the harm that befell the complainants?


13 posted on 01/12/2011 2:29:28 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09; enough_idiocy; meyer; Normandy; Whenifhow; TenthAmendmentChampion; Clive; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

14 posted on 01/12/2011 4:50:06 AM PST by steelyourfaith (ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

I had no idea that phony lawsuits were being leveled against energy companies. The loony part of this whole story is that this case actually made it to the U.S. Supreme Court! I’m glad someone is using their heads in this discussion.


15 posted on 01/12/2011 7:32:41 AM PST by 3rdcoastislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; ...

Thanks Robert A. Cook, PE.
charged energy companies with contributing to the effects of Hurricane Katrina by emitting greenhouse gases

16 posted on 01/12/2011 4:20:45 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

“And the future of the world’s economy rests on a single man; just a slim 5-4 majority (sometimes, not even that!) is all that is between us and the world’s socialists.”

Scary!


17 posted on 01/12/2011 8:04:16 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson