Posted on 01/09/2011 9:37:25 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike
-New Analysis of Democrat Party's Official 2008 Certification of Nomination documents for Obama reveals post-dated alterations not only in the legal content but also possible falsification of the stated time each were submitted to Chief Elections Officer.-
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
I find it interesting that the former Governor of Hawaii...a Republican and a “supposed” friend and supporter of Sarah Palin has not come forward with information regarding this matter. She certainly knows the importance of truth....at least one would hope.
Wow! Thank you thats Great! I still haven’t given up Hope on Limbaugh, just this week he was hammering on all the Corruption that these Thugs are perpetrating on Us!! All the way to how they are Paying Google to spread their Lies and Propaganda which as he points out is a Major Violation of the Hatch Act!!!....and Limbaugh, Beck and Hannity where all playing the Video and Audio of prissy Chris Matthews demanding that Obama show his Long Form to Shut the Birthers Up and asking why he hasn’t shown it! One can only PRAY!
And so I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawai’i. And that’s just a fact. And yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue. And I think, it’s again, a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this. It’s been established. He was born here.” Governor Linda Lingle in a radio interview conducted on May 2, 2010.
If he was born in Kapi’olani Hospital then it was as Obama. Therefore the birth announcements are fraudulent as well (films tampered with?).
Extra, Extra, Announcing obama’s Birth
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/
My personal theory came to me ~2:30 a.m. the other night, when Drudge posted a pic of Obama that looked JUST like Malcolm X. Not a similar resemblance—a dead ringer resemblance.
So here’s my theory. I don’t know exactly where BO was born or who the father is. I do know who it isn’t: Obama Sr. No way did he produce a child as light as BO. (As we’ve seen lately, BO is even lighter when he’s not getting regular sun; his torso looked positively Caucasian in one shot I saw of him.)
I don’t think the original BC lists a father. Michelle said Stanley was very young and very single when she had Obama. For once I think Michelle was telling the truth.
Stanley and O Sr must have married at some point; there’s a divorce, and I don’t see how you get one of those without a marriage. No wonder we’re not allowed to see the original marriage certificate, however; it would reveal the marriage succeeded the birth, which is a fact BO doesn’t want to publicize.
Whatever name he was born with—most likely Barry Dunham—it was changed to Barry Soetero when his stepfather adopted him, and he became an Indonesian citizen. At this point, I’m guessing his mother told Barry Obama Sr was his real father, though she either didn’t know who the father was or knew O Sr was NOT the father. (Her reason would be that she wanted Barry to think he was legitimate, and O Sr. was the only other husband she had.)
So later on Obama got shuffled out of his mother’s life and back to HI. He no longer wanted to be Soetero, and he still believed O Sr to be his father. So he took the full name and became a Jr—understandable in a child who’s been cast off, and is looking for identity.
Later, as he notes, he saw his BC. He knows, therefore, that no father is listed. He probably to this day clings to the idea that O Sr is his father. The fact that it’s genetically a long-shot-to-the-point-of-near-impossibility doesn’t occur to him; he just loves his narrative of Kenyan roots and a Kenyan extended family.
Seems like the most likely scenario to me. Also, it very much explains why he guards the BC so aggressively. He doesn’t want to answer questions about his parentage, and above all he doesn’t want to be accused of fabricating a narrative. So he tells the judge at LTC Lakin’s trial that releasing the BC would be very ‘embarrassing’ - and to save Obama embarrassment the judge agrees to toss an honorable man in the slammer.
Nice work, Barry. But what goes around comes around, so buckle up for a bumpy ride ahead.
Correction: If he was born in Kapi’olani Hospital then it was NOT as Obama. Therefore the birth announcements are fraudulent as well (films tampered with?).
Extra, Extra, Announcing obama’s Birth
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/
You are the one who said to be wary of the BC issue because it was started by Dem. You said it could be an Obama ‘deflection’. You failed to mention that the two Dems who started it were virulently anti-Obama. Sorry, jamese; I don’t even read your posts any more. You are either too uninformed or too disinguous to interest me.
Unfortunately, the topic of this discussion may be, just as it was with the only prior usurper, Chester Arthur, who always concealed his Vermont birth certificate, intended to distract citizens from the truth. What is the truth? Here is just one of many clear statements of the truth, this time by Chief Justice Morrison Waite from his decision in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 from 1874:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizensbecame themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens...”
The definition is from our common-law, just as were most of the definitions of terms used in the Constitution. John Jay, Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Marshall, Story,..., all had the wisdom to agree with ‘nature's law’, most, but not all of them, relying upon Vattel's summary of natures law, "Law of Nations" that the allegiances of the parents shape, and help to assure the allegiances of the child. It sounds like a sensible observation because it is. Humans evolved a civil society by codifying observed behavior. Every parent wants to know about the family which they will join by implication when their child marries.
Obama never said he was a natural born citizen, he said: "I am a native born citizen of the U.S.", which is a State Department definition, a statute, meaning born on our soil but not necessarily of citizen parents. Our founders and framers required that our president be a citizen by nature - not by statute/law; not naturalized. There have be dozens of attempts to amend this provisions of Article II, last by Orrin Hatch in 2003, and every one failed by large margins.
Obama told us his father was not a citizen. Obama and his supporters, like Obot James777 here on FR, are counting on your ignorance about our framers and founders. That is why they pump the irrelevant, and probably deliberate concealment of Soetoro/Obama’s birth records. Obama is not a Constitutional President because he was born to a British/Kenyan father. The argument they use is that the Constitution doesn't matter since the people elected him. That is only true if we forsake our founders and framers, rejecting John Adams and every other founder, to become a nation of men and not law. Every pure democracy has dissolved into anarchy and then dictatorship.
PS: I forgot to thank you for bumping my theory. If more people read it as a result, that’s fine with me. :)
I found something related on Pamala Geller’s blog:
Barack Hussein Obama Jr, Malcolm X, Barack Hussein Obama Sr.:
Barack Hussein Obama Sr., Tom Mboya, and Philip Ochieng, all share common physical features of the Kenyan Luo tribe: Modest stature under six feet, round faces, small chins, wide set eyes, slanted back foreheads, and retracted hairlines…none of these features are shared by Malcolm X and Barack Hussein Obama Jr.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/how-could-stanl.html
That ties in with my observation that Obama looks nothing like the son of O Sr and eerily like the offspring of Malcolm X.
You are the one who said to be wary of the BC issue because it was started by Dem. You said it could be an Obama ‘deflection’. You failed to mention that the two Dems who started it were virulently anti-Obama. Sorry, jamese; I don’t even read your posts any more. You are either too uninformed or too disinguous to interest me.
PS: I forgot to thank you for bumping my theory. If more people read it as a result, that’s fine with me. :)
I found something related on Pamala Geller’s blog:
Barack Hussein Obama Jr, Malcolm X, Barack Hussein Obama Sr.:
Barack Hussein Obama Sr., Tom Mboya, and Philip Ochieng, all share common physical features of the Kenyan Luo tribe: Modest stature under six feet, round faces, small chins, wide set eyes, slanted back foreheads, and retracted hairlines…none of these features are shared by Malcolm X and Barack Hussein Obama Jr.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/how-could-stanl.html
That ties in with my observation that Obama looks nothing like the son of O Sr and eerily like the offspring of Malcolm X.
j..777, “Three problems with the above: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack Hussein Obama” are listed as parents on the birth notices for Barry that appeared in the Honolulu newspapers on August 13 and August 14, 1961.”
How can a birth notice with provably fraudulently information be considered proof? The address listed for one MR. OBAMA has been proven to be false. No one even tries to dispute that he never lived at that address.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/baracks-baggage/
And where would the race code “African” have come from? The original birth certificate you say? There was NO classification for “African” (or African-American) in 1961. Proof of that is also at the link provided above.
I like your theory and it fits with mine.
My theory for why he is so deceptive about his bc and origins is also that his bio dad is not Bo sr. But my reason is not that he is only afraid of his narrative not being true, but also because everywhere he has gotten, he has gotten with Muslim money and push. If he is discovered by the palis and Saudis having lied to them about his own Muslim roots, they will be harder on him than the American people!
It’s all starting to fit together, isn’t it? The thing I like best about your theory is that it fills in one of the biggest gaps in my own thinking. Namely, the tenacity with which BO guards his BC. And yet, ‘tenacity’ isn’t a strong enough word, is it? Nor is any other word I’ve been able to come up with, which has been an ongoing source of frustration for me.
After reading your post, however, the perfect description popped into my head: ‘Obama guards his BC as if his life depends on it’.
That is really the only way to accurately and adequately describe it. If he’s got the Saudis breathing down his neck [and we know millions of foreign dollars flowed into his campaign, not to mention, as you suggested, the issue of who paid his large college bills] that is indeed a life-and-death motivation.
So yes, I like your idea very much. :)
How can a birth notice with provably fraudulently information be considered proof? The address listed for one MR. OBAMA has been proven to be false. No one even tries to dispute that he never lived at that address.
Sightseeing tours in Honolulu still go to the cottage behind the residence on Kalaniana’ole Highway:
http://obamasneighborhood.com/homes.html
When you say “proven” you mean that there have been internet reports that the address isn’t accurate but no court of law and no grand jury has confirmed that to be true.
From the former Republican Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle:
“And so I had my director of Health, who is a physician by background, go and personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health. And we issued a news release at that time stating that the president was born at Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that’s just a fact.
It’s been established. He was born here.” Governor Linda Lingle, May 2, 2010.
You hit the nail on the head. In the 1960’s the birth certificate of a bastard child stated the father was ‘unknown.’
And where would the race code “African” have come from? The original birth certificate you say? There was NO classification for “African” (or African-American) in 1961. Proof of that is also at the link provided above.
It is reasonable to believe that Barack Obama, Sr., would have thought of and reported himself as “African.” To this day, sub-Saharan Africans do not like being lumped together with American blacks and in 1961, they NEVER referred to themselves as “Negro.”
If you were trying to forge a document, would you allow a term to be placed on the document that would so obviously draw attention to it, if it wasn’t on the original?
Yes—and imagine the embarrassment to Obama if—I should say WHEN—the truth comes out. That is the problem for con men. Their game eventually plays out, and they’re exposed as the snake oil salesmen they’ve always been. Just ask Bernie Madoff.
Obama’s secret has kept for a good many years, but the scrutiny is becoming too intense. We’ll find out the truth before too long, and it won’t be pretty for Obama.
FYI: Scanned copies of what the Democrats sent to Hawai’i to get Obama’s name on the ballot:
http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/hawaii-response.pdf
Despite all the optimism about the truth coming out, at this point, it will have to be truth that someone is keeping in a vault somewhere, because the public records appear to have been redacted, amended, and destroyed.
Evidence really can disappear and forever change the outcome of a case. In this case, I fear that is exactly what has happened. Unless and until someone with the real goods lets it out, it won’t come out.
And again we see the common fabric of an ordered society ripped to shreds for the gain of one man.
I remember that...but she has never seen the thing herself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoiuPcZXvkg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.