Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans beware: Mark Kirk is a liberal
http://dailycaller.com ^ | OCt 7,2010 | Tamara Holder

Posted on 10/07/2010 7:24:34 AM PDT by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-269 next last
To: A.Hun; Grunthor
Giannoulias is probably married and straight and won't pollute the GOP caucus by his presence in the Senate as the poofter would. Giannoulias is honest enough to publicly identify himself as what he and Kirk both are: a Democrat. Kirk is not so honest as the gangsta banka. It is possible to be in the same room with a Giannoulias type without suffering terminal nausea. That would be five more differences. That's a fact! I don't think any of those differences favor Nancyboy Kirk however.

Finally, Giannoulias is enough of a man's man to be able to hang out with gangsters who would not be caught dead being anywhere near Nancyboy.

221 posted on 10/08/2010 10:38:00 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; Toddsterpatriot
What part of the Dem's systematic destruction of our nation do you not get? You would actually prefer a Dem thug that will vote in lockstep with Obama and Pelosi over someone that disagrees with them regularly? You do know that this is the same constituency that put Obama in the Senate and that more conservative candidates lost to Kirk?

And why such an attack on Toddsterpatriot or the homo slurs against Kirk? Do you have any proof that Toddsterpatriot is the person you are referencing? As for Kirk (a veteran that has served in Afghanistan) that is nothing more than gossip and is the lowest form of politics.

Matter of fact, it's right out of Huffpo.

Mark Kirk Gay Rumor Reignited..

That's why electing Giannoulias and ending the poofter's career once and for all is the conservative thing to do.

You would have to be a Paultard style libertarian, a Democrat troll, an idiot, or a fool to make that statement on FR.

My guess (because of your tactics) is that you are a Ron Paultard that won't be happy unless your skewed idea of conservative happens...which will be never. Paultards are generally nasty people because they are so frustrated (politically but probably sexually as well).

I don't really care what your problem is, but I do care that you are helping Obama and the Dems destroy our way of life in short order.

To call yourself a conservative while doing it is a sick joke.

222 posted on 10/08/2010 11:16:15 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; rabscuttle385
>> You would actually prefer a Dem thug that will vote in lockstep with Obama and Pelosi over someone that disagrees with them regularly? <<

No, that's why I'm supporting Mike Labno, who disagrees with Pelosi & Obama regularly, rather than support Mark Kirk, who is a closet Democrat thug who regularly votes in lockstep with Obama and Pelosi, and has a voting record over the past decade verifying that fact.

>>> You do know that this is the same constituency that put Obama in the Senate <<

You do know this is the same constiuency that put Peter Fitzgerald in the Senate six years ago? Let me guess, you've never heard of him. Which just shows you how ignorant and clueless the Kirk trolls here are when they "inform" us that "conservatives can't win in Illinois"

>>> You would have to be a Paultard style libertarian, a Democrat troll, an idiot, or a fool to make that statement on FR. BlackElk; Toddsterpatriot What part of the Dem's systematic destruction of our nation do you not get? You would actually prefer a Dem thug that will vote in lockstep with Obama and Pelosi over someone that disagrees with them regularly? You do know that this is the same constituency that put Obama in the Senate and that more conservative candidates lost to Kirk? And why such an attack on Toddsterpatriot or the homo slurs against Kirk? Do you have any proof that Toddsterpatriot is the person you are referencing? As for Kirk (a veteran that has served in Afghanistan) that is nothing more than gossip and is the lowest form of politics. Matter of fact, it's right out of Huffpo. Mark Kirk Gay Rumor Reignited.. That's why electing Giannoulias and ending the poofter's career once and for all is the conservative thing to do. You would have to be a Paultard style libertarian, a Democrat troll, an idiot, or a fool to make that statement on FR. My guess (because of your tactics) is that you are a Ron Paultard that won't be happy unless your skewed idea of conservative happens...which will be never. Paultards are generally nasty people because they are so frustrated (politically but probably sexually as well). I don't really care what your problem is, but I do care that you are helping Obama and the Dems destroy our way of life in short order. To call yourself a conservative while doing it is a sick joke. <<<

LMAO!!! Accusing BlackElk of being a Paultard. That's like accusing Fieldmarshalj or GrayBeard of being Romney supporters or accusing Rabscuttle385 or being a McCainiac. Again, you're way out of your league on this boards and cleraly don't know what you're talking about.

>> I don't really care what your problem is, but I do care that you are helping Obama and the Dems destroy our way of life in short order. <<

Funny, Mark Kirk routinely works to help Obama and the Dems destroy our way of life in short order, and yet you defend him tooth and nail.

>> To call yourself a conservative while doing it is a sick joke. <<

To call yourself a conservative and support Mark Kirk is a sick joke. There are many card-carrying Chicago Democrat goons who don't vote as bad as him. Since Kirk's "values" are acceptable to you, why not endorse them while you're at it?

223 posted on 10/08/2010 1:15:33 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; A.Hun; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; rabscuttle385
No, that's why I'm supporting Mike Labno, who disagrees with Pelosi & Obama regularly, rather than support Mark Kirk, who is a closet Democrat thug who regularly votes in lockstep with Obama and Pelosi, and has a voting record over the past decade verifying that fact.

That's why I'm supporting Mike Labno who doesn't have a chance of getting elected with the vote split between him, Kirk, and the mobster banker, so that there will be another Democrat in the U.S. Senate and possibly allow the Democrats to retain control of all the Senate committees and then I'll say, "Hey, I did the right thing and if everyone else had done what I did, then the whole world would be better off" and we can have another election like 2008 and previous ones where we thought that teaching the GOP a lesson was more important than letting the country be sold down the river by Marxist Democrats.
224 posted on 10/08/2010 1:23:33 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

How’s that Arlen Specter working out for you ?


225 posted on 10/08/2010 1:27:51 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
What does Illinois Tea Party candidate Michael Labno have to do to get some attention around here? Does he have to be more like Christine O’Donnell:

Well, the first thing he had to do like Christine O'Donnell was to win the Republican primary. Is he now planning the Murkowski/Crist approach to elective politics?
226 posted on 10/08/2010 1:36:44 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; BlackElk; fieldmarshaldj; rabscuttle385
Mike Labno hasn't got a snowballs chance in hell of winning. A vote for him is nothing less than a vote for the Dem.

Fieldmarshalj or GrayBeard of being Romney supporters or accusing Rabscuttle385

I don't know BlackElk, all I have to go on is his posts. As far as Fieldmarshaldj and Rabscuttle385 are concerned, they disgust me and I have told them that. I'm sure they don't support Romney or McCain, they prefer Democrats also. In fact, Rabs has got to be on the DNC payroll imho.

To call yourself a conservative and support Mark Kirk is a sick joke.

BlackElk was the one shilling for a liberal, thug Democrat. Apparently you support him, and the Dem nominee (thats bad). I oppose the Dem agenda and anyone running as a Democrat....(I don't live in Illinois so I don't have to hold my nose and vote for Kirk,)

I don't care why you would help elect a Democrat, but I sure as hell won't sit by and let you or anyone else call it conservative.

227 posted on 10/08/2010 2:30:22 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; rabscuttle385
"As far as Fieldmarshaldj and Rabscuttle385 are concerned, they disgust me and I have told them that."

Aww, all that flattery and I'm gonna have to put you on my Christmas Card list, sugar.

228 posted on 10/08/2010 2:53:03 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Y’know, I was trying to figure out what had your panties in a bunch. I went back through 3 1/2 years of your posts, and in all that time, you addressed me precisely twice in a single thread when you issued a denial that Slick Willard was attempting to sabotage Sarah Palin’s VP candidacy over 2 years ago (for which was demonstrably false on your part). At no point in that period did you ever say that I “disgusted you.” Yet another demonstrably false claim.

Why you would make such a bizarre and false statement out of the blue 2 years after your last posts to me I have no idea, but judging from your smears of FReepers in good standing in defending and shilling for one of the worst RINOs in Congress from ostensibly THE most corrupt political machine in the United States speaks more to your character and agenda than it does to ours.


229 posted on 10/08/2010 3:11:38 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
How’s that Arlen Specter working out for you ?

It's not until someone actually does jump ship to give the other party a majority in the Senate or the House that the control changes. If the choice in the vote is between two people, one of whom (the mobster banker) has a greater likelihood of turning control over to or allowing the Democrats to retain control, voting for that person is ill-advised. If the choice in the vote is between three people, and one votes for the person who couldn't win the Republican primary and, thus, cannot win the general election and by doing so ensures the win of the one with the greater likelihood of turning control over to or leaving control with the Democrats (the mobster banker), voting for that 3rd person, no matter how good it feels as an act of political and supposedly moral masturbation, is ill-advised.
230 posted on 10/08/2010 3:33:22 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

IIRC you are one of the worst Bush bashers. That is why I hold you in such low regard, and if you go back far enough, you’ll find where I told you so.

If that is not so, I apologize, but I don’t think that is the case.

I don’t have the time to review 15000 posts to show it to you.


231 posted on 10/08/2010 3:46:16 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Let’s make this simple for you. In order to get a Conservative Republican Senator, the “Mobster Banker” MUST win that race so that Gov. Brady can appoint his successor once his felony conviction occurs. What you apparently want, despite all of us attempting to get through to you the reality of the situation, is a NON-Conservative, a pathological liar, stolen valor fraud, Socialist and Combiner tool of Zero’s who used (and had used on his behalf) typical Chicago Way thug tactics to keep serious opponents out of the primary.

WE want the Conservative Republican Senator. You Rbots want a Trojan Horse Democrat who makes Arlen Specter look like Reagan. Why would we wait for that sniveling weasel to get into the Senate where he’d have even more power to stab us in the back and hold the GOP caucus hostage when he’s been demonstrating his disloyalty from day #1 in the House ?


232 posted on 10/08/2010 3:50:35 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Your recollection skills are faulty. I didn't start to criticize Dubya to any strong degree until effectively AFTER he left office (only modestly before that). I do hold him responsible for his willful failure to deal with the situation with illegals, which has had a considerably negative impact on my life and neighborhood, but aside from that, I rarely dwell on him. So, again, clearly you have mistaken me for someone else. I'm more interested in going after liberals/RINOs who are currently working to undermine the Conservative movement, such as trash like Mark Kirk.
233 posted on 10/08/2010 3:59:43 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Let’s make this simple for you. In order to get a Conservative Republican Senator, the “Mobster Banker” MUST win that race so that Gov. Brady can appoint his successor once his felony conviction occurs.

Your argument above: "Hey, if we had some bread we could have a BLT sandwich, if we had some bacon, and lettuce, and tomato."

You Rbots want a Trojan Horse Democrat who makes Arlen Specter look like Reagan.

Snotty hyperbole that only underscores your fundamental lack of sound argument.

Why would we wait for that sniveling weasel to get into the Senate where he’d have even more power to stab us in the back and hold the GOP caucus hostage when he’s been demonstrating his disloyalty from day #1 in the House ?

Yeah, let's just help elect the mobster banker in the hopes that if a Republican governor is elected and if the mobster banker is indicted and if he is convicted and if he is removed from office after the first year (which is the remainder of the Obama Senate term), the Republican governor, if elected, will name a conservative replacement for the remainder of the term if he wants to do that who may be someone most of the conservatives wanted.

You've got about 5 levels of improbability there versus the certainty that the election of the mobster banker and good buddy of Obama would be, in at least the short term, one more senator closer to Democrat control of the Congress.

More thinking, less bloviating.
234 posted on 10/08/2010 4:09:55 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
. I'm more interested in going after liberals/RINOs who are currently working to undermine the Conservative movement, such as trash like Mark Kirk.

So you would rather see a flaming liberal thug Democrat elected in Illinois? How does that help conservatives or the nation? You can't understand that we have to take a majority in one or both houses to even slow down Obama's destruction of the country, and Kirk could be key to that?

If Kirk doesn't win, we don't even have a chance of a 50/50 split in the Senate. That is the reality.

Once the primaries are over, the Republican bashing should stop. Every single Democrat is worse than his Republican opponent. Anyone that cannot see that is no conservative.

235 posted on 10/08/2010 4:15:16 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2573067/posts?page=35#35

Go read this. I and the rest of us have already explained ad infinitum to you Rbots and Combiner agents why Kirk is 100% unacceptable. Shilling for him and making excuses won’t change what he is.


236 posted on 10/08/2010 4:18:20 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Maybe we should wait for Durbin to be indicted as well?

Chuck Percy lost in 1984. I've been waiting 26 years for the Republicans to win that seat back.

Maybe if we hold our breath waiting for the perfect conservative to run, we won't have to be disappointed in the real world?

237 posted on 10/08/2010 4:23:21 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
"So you would rather see a flaming liberal thug Democrat elected in Illinois?"

Yes. The flaming OPENLY DECLARED liberal thug Democrat as opposed to the closeted liberal thug Democrat RINO.

"How does that help conservatives or the nation?"

By keeping a Trojan Horse Socialist Combiner RINO thug the hell out of the Republican caucus, and by waiting the short period of time for Alexi's trial and conviction, we get an ACTUAL Conservative Republican appointed by NON-Combiner Conservative Republican Gov. Bill Brady. Don't you WANT a Conservative and not a pathological, lying, Socialist fraud who undermines Conservatives at EVERY turn, including trying to undermine the candidacy of Bill Brady ? I do and so do most of the rest of us here.

"You can't understand that we have to take a majority in one or both houses to even slow down Obama's destruction of the country, and Kirk could be key to that?"

How did that Jim Jeffords work out for you ? Don't you understand how incredibly dangerous it is at a 50/50 split to have disloyal left-wingers in the caucus holding the ENTIRE party hostage to their radical agenda ? This would, if elected, make Kirk THE most dangerous Senator in the body. He IS a buddy of Zero's and he's from the SAME CORRUPT POLITICAL MACHINE ! Don't you GET it, Mr. "Defender of Common Sense" ? What exactly is it that you don't comprehend here despite it being explained to you over and over and over and over and over again ? The fact you view this in such black & white terms of party, rather than IDEOLOGICAL labels is very disturbing. Kirk AIN'T a loyal Republican, sir. He is a rank fraud and liar. No man that LIES about his positions, his military record and most everything else deserves to carry the Republican label, period. The mobster banker at least has the intellectual honesty to declare himself what he is... a Democrat. That's more than LIAR Mark Kirk can do. But his ACTIONS speak louder than the lies that come from his mouth.

"Once the primaries are over, the Republican bashing should stop. Every single Democrat is worse than his Republican opponent. Anyone that cannot see that is no conservative."

No, sir, that is not true at all. There are things worse than Democrats... Democrats inside the Republican party like Mark Kirk. Anybody that cannot see that has no brain.

238 posted on 10/08/2010 4:31:34 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Uh, the Percy seat is occupied by Durbin. BTW, do you know how Durbin came to win in the first place ? He won the House seat beating a liberal, rabidly anti-Semite, anti-Zionist colleague of Percy’s, Yassir Arafat’s best friend in Congress, RINO Paul Findley. Had Findley not been a hateful moonbat liberal RINO, Durbin would never have won the House seat which paved the way to the Senate. And just for the icing on top, when the Combiner-preferred R got his ass bumped off in the ‘98 Senate primary, they turned their guns into destroying Al Salvi to install backup pick Durbin. Just like 2 years later they turned their guns on Peter Fitzgerald so they could keep Carol Mostly-Fraud in office.

IL has many great Conservative Reformists, but try getting them past the Combine is like running Sarah Palin in a Democrat primary, they’ll be destroyed. It’s time to do to their corrupt, despicable trash like Kirk what they do to our people. Until we rid the Combiner deathgrip from the IL GOP, things will NEVER change for the better. Or do you like things how they are now ?

BTW, how big a fan of Percy’s were you ? He was one of the worst Senators from IL in the past 50 years, and he has a lot of company.


239 posted on 10/08/2010 4:39:56 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Uh, the Percy seat is occupied by Durbin.

Uh, I know.

BTW, how big a fan of Percy’s were you ?

He was better than Paul Simon and Dick Durbin.

I prefer a 100% conservative to a 50% conservative.

I prefer a 50% conservative to a 0% conservative.

What's your over/under date for an Alexi conviction?

240 posted on 10/08/2010 4:43:08 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson