Replies

Let’s make this simple for you. In order to get a Conservative Republican Senator, the “Mobster Banker” MUST win that race so that Gov. Brady can appoint his successor once his felony conviction occurs.

Your argument above: "Hey, if we had some bread we could have a BLT sandwich, if we had some bacon, and lettuce, and tomato."

You Rbots want a Trojan Horse Democrat who makes Arlen Specter look like Reagan.

Snotty hyperbole that only underscores your fundamental lack of sound argument.

Why would we wait for that sniveling weasel to get into the Senate where he’d have even more power to stab us in the back and hold the GOP caucus hostage when he’s been demonstrating his disloyalty from day #1 in the House ?

Yeah, let's just help elect the mobster banker in the hopes that if a Republican governor is elected and if the mobster banker is indicted and if he is convicted and if he is removed from office after the first year (which is the remainder of the Obama Senate term), the Republican governor, if elected, will name a conservative replacement for the remainder of the term if he wants to do that who may be someone most of the conservatives wanted.

You've got about 5 levels of improbability there versus the certainty that the election of the mobster banker and good buddy of Obama would be, in at least the short term, one more senator closer to Democrat control of the Congress.

More thinking, less bloviating.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2573067/posts?page=35#35

Go read this. I and the rest of us have already explained ad infinitum to you Rbots and Combiner agents why Kirk is 100% unacceptable. Shilling for him and making excuses won’t change what he is.