To: John Semmens
When liberals lie, they always say they “misspoke”.
2 posted on
08/28/2010 9:10:29 AM PDT by
Signalman
To: John Semmens
Translation: I was for it before I was against it but now I'm for it again, sorta. Yup just like always, Charlie speaks his mind clearly and precisely. /sarc. Thank goodness he left the party!
3 posted on
08/28/2010 9:14:11 AM PDT by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: John Semmens
What I recall is that the vote was for an All or Nothing. Perhaps I’m the one who is confused.
4 posted on
08/28/2010 9:16:52 AM PDT by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: John Semmens
The new, restructured, revised, explanation to his position or positions or misspokes will start in 3.....2.....1....
To: John Semmens
I like good things, and I dislike bad things. I hope you agree with me. Let’s move on.
To: John Semmens
” Crist continued. “I want to assure voters that I would’ve voted for these good parts.”
A senator does not have line item veto. If he votes for the legislation, he votes for the bad parts as well as the good.
This is an insult to anyone with a modicum of intelligence.
7 posted on
08/28/2010 9:23:25 AM PDT by
Know et al
(Spill chock want ketch awl yore miss takes.)
To: John Semmens
Actually he was for it before he was against it...or parts of it...or not.
8 posted on
08/28/2010 9:25:23 AM PDT by
blake6900
To: John Semmens
“At the same time, there are other parts of the legislation that are good parts that we absolutely need to have,” Crist continued. “I want to assure voters that I would’ve voted for these good parts.” Dumbass, there are no "good" parts to the frickin' nationalize health care law.
9 posted on
08/28/2010 9:28:30 AM PDT by
calex59
To: John Semmens
This is hilarious. I started reading the excerpt and thought to myself, "This guy's a joke." Then I looked at the article source and realized that the article was a joke, literally. Then I realized Charlie Christ really is a joke if one can't readily distinguish satire from Charlie's reality.
10 posted on
08/28/2010 9:32:15 AM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Made from the Right Stuff!)
To: John Semmens
Maybe Charlie can get a job t one of the many Waffle Houses in Florida after he loses...
Good one
11 posted on
08/28/2010 9:47:45 AM PDT by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: John Semmens
These satire pieces are so close to the truth that even after I know it's satire, I believe it anyway.
Sorry Charlie!
12 posted on
08/28/2010 9:59:33 AM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: John Semmens
Charlie Crist is the poster child for what people hate about politicians. It’s about him, not principles...and everyone knows it now.
14 posted on
08/28/2010 10:57:32 AM PDT by
Hildy
To: John Semmens
All Charlie’s trying to say now is that he wants to have it both ways, split the baby so to say and let it be known that he wants votes from both sides as he straddles the fence on every issue. Sorry Charlie but what you said before this had nothing to do with straddling.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson