Skip to comments.
Mitt Romney’s Realistic Approach To The 9/11 Mosque: Focus On The Economy
/mittromneycentral.com ^
| August 25th, 2010 1:56 am
| Jared A.
Posted on 08/25/2010 1:14:02 AM PDT by pillut48
Newsweek reports that Mitt Romney is taking a different and unique approach than other potential 2012 candidates are. Unlike other politicians, including Obama himself, who feel compelled to offer their opinion on every issue that stirs controversy, Mitt Romney remains focused on the core issue that worries, as well as, unites Americans: the economy.
But now, while Palin and Co. are using the Ground Zero mosque controversy to burnish their far-right bona fides, Romney is seizing on the kerfuffle as an opportunity to do something else entirely: prove that hes the only potential Republican nominee with the fortitude to ignore the 24/7 news cycles endless array of bright, shiny objects and focus instead on improving what he calls the foundations of our economic vitality.
Romney realizes that 2010 isnt 2008, and hes betting that 2012 wont be, either. With the U.S. economy in shamblesand the rest of the Republican pack either too unpolished (Palin), too damaged (Gingrich), or too obscure (Pawlenty) to unseat Obamathe once-and-future candidate sees an opening for himself as the only grown-up, business-savvy, economic-turnaround expert in the race. Back in April, Romney told me what he regretted most about his last presidential run. I wish I had been more effective in being able to communicate the central rationale of my campaign, which is strengthening the economy, getting better jobs, raising incomes, he said. Instead, as a candidate I spent a good deal of time answering questions about social issues. Note how Romney mixed the past and present tenses. The implication was that he wouldnt make the same mistake twice.
(Excerpt) Read more at mittromneycentral.com ...
TOPICS: Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: bain4victorymosque; dhimmiromney; groundzeromosque; homosexualmarriage; islam; logcabingop; mittromney; mythromney; obamacare; rinos; romney; romney4backstabbing; romney4fakepolls; romney4fauxpolls; romney4gaymarriage; romney4mosque; romney4obama; romney4obamacare; romney4romney; romney4romneycare; romneycare; romneymarriage; sharia; victorymosque; willard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
So, it looks like the MSM has decided Mitt's going to be the candidate in 2012, eh? "The 9/11 Victory Mosque/**** the 9/11 Families" controversy is just a "24/7 news cycles endless array of bright, shiny objects"???
Are the people over there at Newsweek and "Mitt Central" taking hard drugs, or what??
1
posted on
08/25/2010 1:14:04 AM PDT
by
pillut48
To: pillut48
RomneyCare, just by itself, will end Romney’s chances for political victory.
2
posted on
08/25/2010 1:18:28 AM PDT
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: pillut48
“Mitt Romneys Realistic Approach To The 9/11 Mosque: Capitulate”
3
posted on
08/25/2010 1:27:21 AM PDT
by
Psalm 144
To: pillut48
Romney getting his hands on the economy is the second to last thing I want to see in 2012.
4
posted on
08/25/2010 1:30:46 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
To: pillut48
The just won’t give up. Won’t work.
5
posted on
08/25/2010 1:32:19 AM PDT
by
FreeStateYank
(I want my country and constitution back, now!)
To: pillut48
I’ve seen hints of that in various places. It usually reads like ‘progressives’ reluctantly giving into admiration for the man’s brilliance and focus. That, apparently, is what the MSM is telling us we thirst for most because, as Obama worshippers, those are the two traits they, oddly enough, paint Obama with. They think we like the same bright shiny objects as they do if they just wave him in our face enough.
To: pillut48
Mitt and many others like him have spent decades focusing on anything except what the leftists are up to at the moment. They're always “above the fray” and focusing on “more important” things. That's the kind of blatant stupidity that let leftist judges be appointed, Christmas be damn near outlawed, and ignored systematic violations of the Second Amendment for decade after decade until someone finally took the matter to court.
Yeah, Mitt is focused on more important things all right, he's focused on not having the MSM on his butt so he can go along to get along just like so many others in spite of the country going over the cliff.
Regards
7
posted on
08/25/2010 1:37:27 AM PDT
by
Rashputin
(Obama is already insane and sequestered on golf courses or vacations so you won't know it)
To: johnthebaptistmoore
I fear Romney will get the nomination and thus we will have a Kenyan reprise. I think that I would prefer a Soetoro win in 2012 to a Romney win. Unless things really go to hell for Republicans in the next two years we would have a Republican Congress with hobbled Imam Hussein. That would be better, I think than a Keynesian Romney. Too many Republicans would go along with Romney "improvements" to Obamacare and Romney would have a voting bloc of N.E. Republicans and Social Democrats. I cannot see a Republican other than Romney right now who can win the primaries unless the Clintons decide to run Mrs.Bill. If she is in it for real then Democrats will not swarm the Republican primaries and ally with the RNC to give us Romney.
8
posted on
08/25/2010 1:40:29 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
To: pillut48
9
posted on
08/25/2010 1:41:18 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: pillut48
10
posted on
08/25/2010 2:19:05 AM PDT
by
montag813
(http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
To: pillut48
Romney realizes that 2010 isnt 2008, and hes betting that 2012 wont be, either. - Wow what an intellect - him big smarts man!
11
posted on
08/25/2010 2:30:51 AM PDT
by
Free_at_last_-2001
(A country can survive its fools, but it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: pillut48
So in other words, Romney doesn't even have the balls to say what he believes on this issue?
That makes him even worse than 0bama.
12
posted on
08/25/2010 2:51:07 AM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: arthurus
I think that I would prefer a Soetoro win in 2012 to a Romney win.I agree. There is literally 0 difference between 0bama and Romney policy-wise. If the country is going to continue being screwed, we might as well have a Democrat doing it.
13
posted on
08/25/2010 2:52:39 AM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: pillut48
All I can say is for once I’d love to see someone in the WH who can speak clearly about our economy and do the right thing to get us back on track again.
When it is very clear that the govt policies after the depression, prolonged the depression and raised unemployment, you have an idiot in the WH now who is doing the same thing and won’t stop.
14
posted on
08/25/2010 2:59:04 AM PDT
by
nikos1121
(Praying today for -23, better yet -24......)
To: pillut48
Palin gets more polished every week....the rest get tarnished.
15
posted on
08/25/2010 2:59:50 AM PDT
by
nikos1121
(Praying today for -23, better yet -24......)
To: pillut48
16
posted on
08/25/2010 3:00:35 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: pillut48
"
Romney praises Obama again WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney praised President Obama
at a GOP fundraising dinner Wednesday ..
"I also think it's important for us to nod to the president when he's right," Romney said....
Romney, who spoke at a dinner for the National Republican Senatorial Committee,
said he's pleased with the president's plans to "finish the job" in Iraq and Afghanistan
-- lines that drew applause from the partisan audience. He also applauded the president
for standing up to the auto industry.
"I hope he continues to be tough ....The former businessman even offered faint praise for
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, saying that after a series of initial missteps,
"I think he's finally getting close to the right answer."
17
posted on
08/25/2010 3:01:28 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: nikos1121
True, but that would NOT be Romney, the proven bad governor.
"As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal."
[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]
18
posted on
08/25/2010 3:05:47 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: pillut48
Romney - The anti President Reagan.
Romney - Ineligible ... like Obama.
"I'm not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values.
That's not what brings me to the race.
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldnt make any sense at all.""
-- President Ronald Reagan
"I'm very clear I think, to the people across the Commonwealth
my "R" didn't stand so much for Republican as it does for reform."
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"A political party cannot be all things to all people.
It must represent certain fundamental beliefs
which must not be compromised to political expediency
or simply to swell its numbers."
-- President Ronald Reagan
19
posted on
08/25/2010 3:18:11 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: pillut48
By "purposely" NOT weighing on an AMERICAN SECURITY ISSUE (Shari'a Expansion in the USA) ... Romney, with his silence has stuck himself to the issue.
The Tar Baby Mosque.
20
posted on
08/25/2010 6:32:34 AM PDT
by
ThePatriotsFlag
(http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson